×




Merger of Equals: The Integration of Mellon Financial and The Bank of New York (A) Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Merger of Equals: The Integration of Mellon Financial and The Bank of New York (A) case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Merger of Equals: The Integration of Mellon Financial and The Bank of New York (A) case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Ryan D. Taliaferro, Clayton Rose, David Lane. The Merger of Equals: The Integration of Mellon Financial and The Bank of New York (A) (referred as “Mellon York” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Mergers & acquisitions, Technology.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Merger of Equals: The Integration of Mellon Financial and The Bank of New York (A) Case Study


Less than a month after the close of the merger between The Bank of New York and Mellon Financial, managers at the two firms realized that plans for combining their asset servicing businesses - and realizing the $180 million of annual cost savings that they had promised Wall Street - were fraught with risk. Senior executives must evaluate the seriousness of the risks and identify alternative ways of integrating the two firms, while safeguarding the technologies that process and clear a substantial fraction of the world's financial transactions. [Continues with "B" and "C" cases.]


Case Authors : Ryan D. Taliaferro, Clayton Rose, David Lane

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Mergers & acquisitions, Technology




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Merger of Equals: The Integration of Mellon Financial and The Bank of New York (A) Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10006403) -10006403 - -
Year 1 3469628 -6536775 3469628 0.9434 3273234
Year 2 3970624 -2566151 7440252 0.89 3533841
Year 3 3938466 1372315 11378718 0.8396 3306812
Year 4 3224649 4596964 14603367 0.7921 2554224
TOTAL 14603367 12668111




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2661708

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Profitability Index
3. Net Present Value
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Mellon York shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Mellon York have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Merger of Equals: The Integration of Mellon Financial and The Bank of New York (A)

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Mellon York often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Mellon York needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10006403) -10006403 - -
Year 1 3469628 -6536775 3469628 0.8696 3017068
Year 2 3970624 -2566151 7440252 0.7561 3002362
Year 3 3938466 1372315 11378718 0.6575 2589605
Year 4 3224649 4596964 14603367 0.5718 1843704
TOTAL 10452739


The Net NPV after 4 years is 446336

(10452739 - 10006403 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10006403) -10006403 - -
Year 1 3469628 -6536775 3469628 0.8333 2891357
Year 2 3970624 -2566151 7440252 0.6944 2757378
Year 3 3938466 1372315 11378718 0.5787 2279205
Year 4 3224649 4596964 14603367 0.4823 1555097
TOTAL 9483036


The Net NPV after 4 years is -523367

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9483036 - 10006403 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Mellon York to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Mellon York has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Mellon York can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Mellon York, then the stock price of the Mellon York should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Mellon York should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Merger of Equals: The Integration of Mellon Financial and The Bank of New York (A)

References & Further Readings

Ryan D. Taliaferro, Clayton Rose, David Lane (2018), "Merger of Equals: The Integration of Mellon Financial and The Bank of New York (A) Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Intersections SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Services


ATS Automation Tooling SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


Shimizu Corp. SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Eastern Iron Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Metal Mining


Owens-Illinois SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Containers & Packaging


Hexo SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


NFI Group SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Manufacturers


Swire Pacific SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services