×




High Wire Act: Credit Suisse and Contingent Capital (A) Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for High Wire Act: Credit Suisse and Contingent Capital (A) case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. High Wire Act: Credit Suisse and Contingent Capital (A) case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Clayton Rose, Aldo Sesia. The High Wire Act: Credit Suisse and Contingent Capital (A) (referred as “Contingent Suisse” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Competitive strategy, Decision making, Financial markets, Leadership, Recession, Risk management.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of High Wire Act: Credit Suisse and Contingent Capital (A) Case Study


Late in 2010, Credit Suisse CEO Brady Dougan and his team closed in on the decision of whether or not to issue contingent capital, which Swiss regulators would require by 2019. There were a number of substantial issues facing Dougan and his team, including whether contingent capital would provide sufficient loss absorption when called upon, would there be sufficient demand for this new instrument, would it be cost effective capital, and what were the risks to Credit Suisse' reputation with clients and regulators if an issue did not go well? In addition, The Basel Committee, the body that recommended global bank capital standards, had decided that much of the existing bank "hybrid debt" would no longer count as capital for regulatory purposes, meaning banks would need to replace this portion of their equity accounts with some other form of capital. However, Basel had yet to decide whether contingent capital would be allowable in the new "Basel III" regulatory regime.


Case Authors : Clayton Rose, Aldo Sesia

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Competitive strategy, Decision making, Financial markets, Leadership, Recession, Risk management




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for High Wire Act: Credit Suisse and Contingent Capital (A) Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10022194) -10022194 - -
Year 1 3462526 -6559668 3462526 0.9434 3266534
Year 2 3954279 -2605389 7416805 0.89 3519294
Year 3 3958170 1352781 11374975 0.8396 3323356
Year 4 3233696 4586477 14608671 0.7921 2561390
TOTAL 14608671 12670574




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2648380

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Profitability Index
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Contingent Suisse shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Contingent Suisse have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of High Wire Act: Credit Suisse and Contingent Capital (A)

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Contingent Suisse often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Contingent Suisse needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10022194) -10022194 - -
Year 1 3462526 -6559668 3462526 0.8696 3010892
Year 2 3954279 -2605389 7416805 0.7561 2990003
Year 3 3958170 1352781 11374975 0.6575 2602561
Year 4 3233696 4586477 14608671 0.5718 1848876
TOTAL 10452332


The Net NPV after 4 years is 430138

(10452332 - 10022194 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10022194) -10022194 - -
Year 1 3462526 -6559668 3462526 0.8333 2885438
Year 2 3954279 -2605389 7416805 0.6944 2746027
Year 3 3958170 1352781 11374975 0.5787 2290608
Year 4 3233696 4586477 14608671 0.4823 1559460
TOTAL 9481533


The Net NPV after 4 years is -540661

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9481533 - 10022194 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Contingent Suisse to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Contingent Suisse has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Contingent Suisse can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Contingent Suisse, then the stock price of the Contingent Suisse should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Contingent Suisse should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of High Wire Act: Credit Suisse and Contingent Capital (A)

References & Further Readings

Clayton Rose, Aldo Sesia (2018), "High Wire Act: Credit Suisse and Contingent Capital (A) Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


China Trustful SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts


Guangzhou Restaurant SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Lonmin SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Metal Mining


Ganesha Ecosphere Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemicals - Plastics & Rubber


Haulotte SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. & Agric. Machinery


Aero Engine Ctrl A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Aerospace & Defense


Nanfang Pump Industry SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


Orthofix SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Medical Equipment & Supplies


Far East Smarter Energy SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Communications Equipment


Monster Arts SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Printing & Publishing


Daiho Corp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services