×




Leadership Development at Goldman Sachs Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Leadership Development at Goldman Sachs case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Leadership Development at Goldman Sachs case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Boris Groysberg, Scott A. Snook, David Lane. The Leadership Development at Goldman Sachs (referred as “Sachs Goldman” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Influence, Leadership development, Organizational structure.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Leadership Development at Goldman Sachs Case Study


In November 1999, 11 of Goldman Sachs' finest gathered to put the final touches on a revolutionary leadership development plan. Following Goldman's explosive growth during the 1990s and its eventual IPO in 1999, a diverse group of leaders from across the firm were selected to "assess the future training and development needs of Goldman Sachs, with a particular focus on the need for a more systematic and effective approach to developing managing directors." After six months of brainstorming, holding discussions with Goldman Sachs colleagues, interviewing experts, and benchmarking best practices, it was finally time to present their findings to the management committee. The briefing contained an integrated leader development plan with concrete recommendations on how to resolve several critical design issues, including: location, faculty, content, format, method, target audience, governance, and sponsorship. No one sitting on the management committee had relied on a formal leadership program to reach the top. How skeptical might they be? How do you convince hard-nosed bankers to leave their desks and invest precious time focusing on what many perceived as "soft" issues?


Case Authors : Boris Groysberg, Scott A. Snook, David Lane

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Influence, Leadership development, Organizational structure




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Leadership Development at Goldman Sachs Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10002931) -10002931 - -
Year 1 3463566 -6539365 3463566 0.9434 3267515
Year 2 3969739 -2569626 7433305 0.89 3533054
Year 3 3964185 1394559 11397490 0.8396 3328406
Year 4 3231447 4626006 14628937 0.7921 2559609
TOTAL 14628937 12688584




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2685653

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Payback Period
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Sachs Goldman shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Sachs Goldman have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Leadership Development at Goldman Sachs

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Sachs Goldman often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Sachs Goldman needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10002931) -10002931 - -
Year 1 3463566 -6539365 3463566 0.8696 3011797
Year 2 3969739 -2569626 7433305 0.7561 3001693
Year 3 3964185 1394559 11397490 0.6575 2606516
Year 4 3231447 4626006 14628937 0.5718 1847590
TOTAL 10467596


The Net NPV after 4 years is 464665

(10467596 - 10002931 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10002931) -10002931 - -
Year 1 3463566 -6539365 3463566 0.8333 2886305
Year 2 3969739 -2569626 7433305 0.6944 2756763
Year 3 3964185 1394559 11397490 0.5787 2294089
Year 4 3231447 4626006 14628937 0.4823 1558375
TOTAL 9495532


The Net NPV after 4 years is -507399

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9495532 - 10002931 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Sachs Goldman to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Sachs Goldman has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Sachs Goldman can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Sachs Goldman, then the stock price of the Sachs Goldman should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Sachs Goldman should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Leadership Development at Goldman Sachs

References & Further Readings

Boris Groysberg, Scott A. Snook, David Lane (2018), "Leadership Development at Goldman Sachs Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Kepco SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Utilities , Electric Utilities


Filta Group SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Pentamaster Corp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Lisi SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Misc. Fabricated Products


Alpha Bank SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Regional Banks


Shen Ma Industry SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemicals - Plastics & Rubber


Kyowa Leather Cloth SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Textiles - Non Apparel


Hebei Sailhero Environmental SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Scientific & Technical Instr.


Malaysian Bulk Carriers SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Transportation , Water Transportation