×




Hub and Spoke, HealthCare Global, and Additional Focused Factory Models for Cancer Care Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Hub and Spoke, HealthCare Global, and Additional Focused Factory Models for Cancer Care case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Hub and Spoke, HealthCare Global, and Additional Focused Factory Models for Cancer Care case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Regina E. Herzlinger, Amit Ghorawat, Meera Krishnan, Naiyya Saggi. The Hub and Spoke, HealthCare Global, and Additional Focused Factory Models for Cancer Care (referred as “Models Hub” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Business models, Entrepreneurship, Health, Marketing, Supply chain.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Hub and Spoke, HealthCare Global, and Additional Focused Factory Models for Cancer Care Case Study


This case compares and contrasts four different models for delivering cancer care in India and the US. Students are asked to select the best model in its alignment with the Six Forces in those two countries and Africa, to which one of the models is considering expansion, and intrinsic business characteristics. The Indian models are all focused factories, but one is a hub and spoke model, with a radiology hub and ambulatory spokes, while the other offers only ambulatory services. The U.S. models are all focused factory hospitals, one academic and the other a private, for-profit firm located on the grounds of teaching hospitals.


Case Authors : Regina E. Herzlinger, Amit Ghorawat, Meera Krishnan, Naiyya Saggi

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Business models, Entrepreneurship, Health, Marketing, Supply chain




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Hub and Spoke, HealthCare Global, and Additional Focused Factory Models for Cancer Care Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10006415) -10006415 - -
Year 1 3452666 -6553749 3452666 0.9434 3257232
Year 2 3954509 -2599240 7407175 0.89 3519499
Year 3 3943996 1344756 11351171 0.8396 3311455
Year 4 3228693 4573449 14579864 0.7921 2557427
TOTAL 14579864 12645613




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2639198

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Net Present Value
3. Payback Period
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Models Hub shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Models Hub have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Hub and Spoke, HealthCare Global, and Additional Focused Factory Models for Cancer Care

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Models Hub often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Models Hub needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10006415) -10006415 - -
Year 1 3452666 -6553749 3452666 0.8696 3002318
Year 2 3954509 -2599240 7407175 0.7561 2990177
Year 3 3943996 1344756 11351171 0.6575 2593241
Year 4 3228693 4573449 14579864 0.5718 1846016
TOTAL 10431752


The Net NPV after 4 years is 425337

(10431752 - 10006415 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10006415) -10006415 - -
Year 1 3452666 -6553749 3452666 0.8333 2877222
Year 2 3954509 -2599240 7407175 0.6944 2746187
Year 3 3943996 1344756 11351171 0.5787 2282405
Year 4 3228693 4573449 14579864 0.4823 1557047
TOTAL 9462861


The Net NPV after 4 years is -543554

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9462861 - 10006415 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Models Hub to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Models Hub has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Models Hub can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Models Hub, then the stock price of the Models Hub should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Models Hub should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Hub and Spoke, HealthCare Global, and Additional Focused Factory Models for Cancer Care

References & Further Readings

Regina E. Herzlinger, Amit Ghorawat, Meera Krishnan, Naiyya Saggi (2018), "Hub and Spoke, HealthCare Global, and Additional Focused Factory Models for Cancer Care Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Fuji Oil Co Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Autoliv SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts


Stratasys Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Peripherals


BizConf Telecom SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Communications Services


Public Packages Holdings SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Containers & Packaging


Incon SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Audio & Video Equipment


Soundwill Holdings SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


Finbond Group Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Consumer Financial Services


Noble Midstream SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas - Integrated