Stone Finch, Inc.: Young Division, Old Division Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Stone Finch, Inc.: Young Division, Old Division case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Stone Finch, Inc.: Young Division, Old Division case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Richard G. Hamermesh, Elizabeth Collins. The Stone Finch, Inc.: Young Division, Old Division (referred as “Division Subsidiaries” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Growth strategy, Leadership, Mergers & acquisitions, Motivating people, Operations management, Organizational culture, Organizational structure, Talent management.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

---

Case Description of Stone Finch, Inc.: Young Division, Old Division Case Study

When students have the English-language PDF of this Brief Case in a coursepack, they will also have the option to purchase an audio version.CEO Jim Billings wants to attract energetic, entrepreneurial talent to Stone Finch, Inc., which comprises an older division that fabricates products like piping and tanks for water and wastewater processing plants, and a much newer division that develops biochemical solutions associated with water purification. To accelerate the company's growth, Billings sets up subsidiaries to create cutting-edge technologies that can be brought to market by the biochemical solutions division. After a few years the subsidiaries have indeed produced innovative products and driven growth; however, problems are surfacing. Much of the investment in the subsidiaries has come from the old manufacturing-based "cash cow" division, which is now suffering from turnover, loss of morale, and loss of competitive position. Moreover, the solutions division -- which has absorbed numerous employees who became wealthy by developing successful subsidiaries -- is plagued by increasing polarization between the "haves" and the "have-nots."

Case Authors : Richard G. Hamermesh, Elizabeth Collins

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Growth strategy, Leadership, Mergers & acquisitions, Motivating people, Operations management, Organizational culture, Organizational structure, Talent management

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Stone Finch, Inc.: Young Division, Old Division Case Study

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 6 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10001261)	-10001261	-	-
Year 1	3448971	-6552290	3448971	0.9434	3253746
Year 2	3964319	-2587971	7413290	0.89	3528230
Year 3	3940154	1352183	11353444	0.8396	3308229
Year 4	3248196	4600379	14601640	0.7921	2572875
TOTAL			14601640		12663081

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2661820

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

---

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Payback Period
3. Net Present Value
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Division Subsidiaries have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Division Subsidiaries shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.

---

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Stone Finch, Inc.: Young Division, Old Division

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Division Subsidiaries often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Division Subsidiaries needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 15 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10001261)	-10001261	-	-
Year 1	3448971	-6552290	3448971	0.8696	2999105
Year 2	3964319	-2587971	7413290	0.7561	2997595
Year 3	3940154	1352183	11353444	0.6575	2590715
Year 4	3248196	4600379	14601640	0.5718	1857167
TOTAL					10444582

The Net NPV after 4 years is 443321

(10444582 - 10001261 )

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 20 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10001261)	-10001261	-	-
Year 1	3448971	-6552290	3448971	0.8333	2874143
Year 2	3964319	-2587971	7413290	0.6944	2752999
Year 3	3940154	1352183	11353444	0.5787	2280182
Year 4	3248196	4600379	14601640	0.4823	1566453
TOTAL					9473776

The Net NPV after 4 years is -527485

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9473776 - 10001261 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Division Subsidiaries to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Division Subsidiaries has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Division Subsidiaries can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Division Subsidiaries, then the stock price of the Division Subsidiaries should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Division Subsidiaries should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

---

Negotiation Strategy of Stone Finch, Inc.: Young Division, Old Division

References & Further Readings

Richard G. Hamermesh, Elizabeth Collins (2018), "Stone Finch, Inc.: Young Division, Old Division Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.