×




ECCO A/S - Global Value Chain Management Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for ECCO A/S - Global Value Chain Management case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. ECCO A/S - Global Value Chain Management case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Bo Nielsen, Torben Pedersen, Jacob Pyndt. The ECCO A/S - Global Value Chain Management (referred as “Ecco Chain” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Leadership development, Marketing, Mergers & acquisitions, Supply chain.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of ECCO A/S - Global Value Chain Management Case Study


ECCO A/S (ECCO) had been very successful in the footwear industry by focusing on production technology and assuring quality by maintaining full control of the entire value chain from "cow to shoe." As ECCO grew and faced increased international competition, various value chain activities, primarily production and tanning, were offshored to low-cost countries. The fully integrated value chain tied up significant capital and management attention in tanneries and production facilities, which could have been used to strengthen the branding and marketing of ECCO's shoes. Moreover, an increasingly complex and dispersed global value chain configuration posed organizational and managerial challenges regarding coordination, communication and logistics. This case examines the financial, organizational and managerial challenges of maintaining a highly integrated global value chain and asks students to determine the appropriateness of this set-up in the context of an increasingly market-oriented industry. It is suitable for use in both undergraduate and graduate courses in international corporate strategy, international management, international marketing, supply-chain management, cross-border strategic management and international business studies in general.


Case Authors : Bo Nielsen, Torben Pedersen, Jacob Pyndt

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Leadership development, Marketing, Mergers & acquisitions, Supply chain




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for ECCO A/S - Global Value Chain Management Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10018356) -10018356 - -
Year 1 3452841 -6565515 3452841 0.9434 3257397
Year 2 3966625 -2598890 7419466 0.89 3530282
Year 3 3955390 1356500 11374856 0.8396 3321022
Year 4 3229322 4585822 14604178 0.7921 2557925
TOTAL 14604178 12666627




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2648271

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Payback Period
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Ecco Chain shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Ecco Chain have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of ECCO A/S - Global Value Chain Management

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Ecco Chain often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Ecco Chain needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10018356) -10018356 - -
Year 1 3452841 -6565515 3452841 0.8696 3002470
Year 2 3966625 -2598890 7419466 0.7561 2999338
Year 3 3955390 1356500 11374856 0.6575 2600733
Year 4 3229322 4585822 14604178 0.5718 1846375
TOTAL 10448917


The Net NPV after 4 years is 430561

(10448917 - 10018356 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10018356) -10018356 - -
Year 1 3452841 -6565515 3452841 0.8333 2877368
Year 2 3966625 -2598890 7419466 0.6944 2754601
Year 3 3955390 1356500 11374856 0.5787 2288999
Year 4 3229322 4585822 14604178 0.4823 1557351
TOTAL 9478318


The Net NPV after 4 years is -540038

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9478318 - 10018356 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Ecco Chain to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Ecco Chain has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Ecco Chain can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Ecco Chain, then the stock price of the Ecco Chain should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Ecco Chain should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of ECCO A/S - Global Value Chain Management

References & Further Readings

Bo Nielsen, Torben Pedersen, Jacob Pyndt (2018), "ECCO A/S - Global Value Chain Management Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Akr Corporindo SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas Operations


Mattioli SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


Hyundai Bngste SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Iron & Steel


Nippon SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Kwangdong Phar SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Eco World Develop SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Tembo Gold Corp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Gold & Silver


Hudson's Bay Company SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Retail (Department & Discount)


Zurich Insurance Group SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Insurance (Prop. & Casualty)


Okaya Electric Industries SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls