×




Americhem: The Gaylord Division (A) Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Americhem: The Gaylord Division (A) case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Americhem: The Gaylord Division (A) case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by David A. Garvin. The Americhem: The Gaylord Division (A) (referred as “Americhem Gaylord” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Collaboration, Leadership, Strategic planning, Strategy execution.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Americhem: The Gaylord Division (A) Case Study


The Gaylord Division of Americhem, a large chemical company, is in the midst of the first use of a new zero-base budgeting system. The general manager of the division leading the process is experiencing disagreement and conflict among the members of the senior management team. This case describes a difficult meeting. A rewritten version of an earlier case.


Case Authors : David A. Garvin

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Collaboration, Leadership, Strategic planning, Strategy execution




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Americhem: The Gaylord Division (A) Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10024509) -10024509 - -
Year 1 3443378 -6581131 3443378 0.9434 3248470
Year 2 3964644 -2616487 7408022 0.89 3528519
Year 3 3940370 1323883 11348392 0.8396 3308411
Year 4 3237117 4561000 14585509 0.7921 2564100
TOTAL 14585509 12649499




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2624990

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Profitability Index
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Americhem Gaylord shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Americhem Gaylord have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Americhem: The Gaylord Division (A)

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Americhem Gaylord often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Americhem Gaylord needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10024509) -10024509 - -
Year 1 3443378 -6581131 3443378 0.8696 2994242
Year 2 3964644 -2616487 7408022 0.7561 2997840
Year 3 3940370 1323883 11348392 0.6575 2590857
Year 4 3237117 4561000 14585509 0.5718 1850832
TOTAL 10433772


The Net NPV after 4 years is 409263

(10433772 - 10024509 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10024509) -10024509 - -
Year 1 3443378 -6581131 3443378 0.8333 2869482
Year 2 3964644 -2616487 7408022 0.6944 2753225
Year 3 3940370 1323883 11348392 0.5787 2280307
Year 4 3237117 4561000 14585509 0.4823 1561110
TOTAL 9464123


The Net NPV after 4 years is -560386

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9464123 - 10024509 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Americhem Gaylord to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Americhem Gaylord has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Americhem Gaylord can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Americhem Gaylord, then the stock price of the Americhem Gaylord should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Americhem Gaylord should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Americhem: The Gaylord Division (A)

References & Further Readings

David A. Garvin (2018), "Americhem: The Gaylord Division (A) Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Vortex Consolidated SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Uchiyama Holdings SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Healthcare Facilities


Inbar Finance SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


TSE SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Semiconductors


Dabeinong Tech A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Heska SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Orbit SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Namhae Chemical SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


CEFC Hong Kong Financial SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Apparel/Accessories


NJ SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Communications Equipment


Planet.FR SA SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Business Services