Shilling & Smith Acquisition of Xteria Inc.: Data Center Technology Leasing Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Shilling & Smith Acquisition of Xteria Inc.: Data Center Technology Leasing case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Shilling & Smith Acquisition of Xteria Inc.: Data Center Technology Leasing case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Mark Jeffery, Cassidy Shield, H. Nevin Ekici, Mike Conley. The Shilling & Smith Acquisition of Xteria Inc.: Data Center Technology Leasing (referred as “Xteria Shilling” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Financial management, IT, Mergers & acquisitions.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

---

Case Description of Shilling & Smith Acquisition of Xteria Inc.: Data Center Technology Leasing Case Study

The case centers on Shilling & Smith's acquisition of Xteria Inc. and the resulting need to quickly scale the company's IT infrastructure to accommodate the acquisition. The case is based on a real leasing problem faced by a major retail firm in the Chicago area when it purchased a small credit card processing firm and scaled the operations to handle the retail firm's credit card transactions. The CIO of Shilling & Smith needs to determine which lease option is the best means of providing the technical infrastructure needed to support the firm after the acquisition of Xteria. Several issues will drive this decision, including the value and useful life of the equipment, as well as the strategic context of the firm. This case examines how to evaluate different lease options when acquiring data center information technology infrastructure. Specifically, the case addresses software vs. hardware leasing, different lease terms, and choosing between different lease structures depending on the strategy and needs of a company. This case enables students to understand the different types of technology leases and in which situations these leases would be employed.

Case Authors : Mark Jeffery, Cassidy Shield, H. Nevin Ekici, Mike Conley

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Financial management, IT, Mergers & acquisitions

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Shilling & Smith Acquisition of Xteria Inc.: Data Center Technology Leasing Case Study

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 6 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10009819)	-10009819	-	-
Year 1	3443488	-6566331	3443488	0.9434	3248574
Year 2	3967772	-2598559	7411260	0.89	3531303
Year 3	3948978	1350419	11360238	0.8396	3315638
Year 4	3234599	4585018	14594837	0.7921	2562105
TOTAL			14594837		12657620

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2647801

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

---

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Net Present Value
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Xteria Shilling shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Xteria Shilling have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.

---

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Shilling & Smith Acquisition of Xteria Inc.: Data Center Technology Leasing

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Xteria Shilling often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Xteria Shilling needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 15 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10009819)	-10009819	-	-
Year 1	3443488	-6566331	3443488	0.8696	2994337
Year 2	3967772	-2598559	7411260	0.7561	3000206
Year 3	3948978	1350419	11360238	0.6575	2596517
Year 4	3234599	4585018	14594837	0.5718	1849392
TOTAL					10440453

The Net NPV after 4 years is 430634

(10440453 - 10009819 )

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 20 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10009819)	-10009819	-	-
Year 1	3443488	-6566331	3443488	0.8333	2869573
Year 2	3967772	-2598559	7411260	0.6944	2755397
Year 3	3948978	1350419	11360238	0.5787	2285288
Year 4	3234599	4585018	14594837	0.4823	1559895
TOTAL					9470154

The Net NPV after 4 years is -539665

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9470154 - 10009819 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Xteria Shilling to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Xteria Shilling has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Xteria Shilling can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Xteria Shilling, then the stock price of the Xteria Shilling should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Xteria Shilling should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

---

Negotiation Strategy of Shilling & Smith Acquisition of Xteria Inc.: Data Center Technology Leasing

References & Further Readings

Mark Jeffery, Cassidy Shield, H. Nevin Ekici, Mike Conley (2018), "Shilling & Smith Acquisition of Xteria Inc.: Data Center Technology Leasing Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.