×




The Ultimate Bluff: A Case Study Of Partygaming.com Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for The Ultimate Bluff: A Case Study Of Partygaming.com case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. The Ultimate Bluff: A Case Study Of Partygaming.com case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Des Laffey. The The Ultimate Bluff: A Case Study Of Partygaming.com (referred as “Partygaming Gambling” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, .

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of The Ultimate Bluff: A Case Study Of Partygaming.com Case Study


June 2005 was to bring online gambling out of the shadows and into the spotlight. PartyGaming, a start-up formed in 1997, launched a flotation (Initial Public Offering) on the London Stock Exchange that valued the firm at A?4.64 billion giving it a larger market capitalisation than British Airways. PartyGaming had become the dominant player in the booming online poker market with its PartyPoker brand having over 50% market share. However, this float - as with Internet gambling in general - was not without controversy. While PartyGaming had an online gambling license from the tax haven of Gibraltar, nearly 90% of its revenue came from the United States, where the authorities viewed Internet gambling as illegal and threatened legal action. The complex operations of this truly global firm with bases in London, India, Gibraltar and Canada, the background of its founder Ruth Parasol in Internet pornography and the handling of its flotation also raised concerns from an ethical perspective, with some commentators questioning whether the float should have been allowed at all. These concerns were then confirmed as US legislation to curb online gambling was passed in September 2006, leading to PartyGaming's exit from the US market and an immediate fall of 58% in the share price. This case study analyses the entrepreneurs behind PartyGaming, its growth, the challenges it has faced, the ethical issues it poses and its future prospects. The case draws on theory from e-commerce, strategy and ethics.


Case Authors : Des Laffey

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas :




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for The Ultimate Bluff: A Case Study Of Partygaming.com Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10005543) -10005543 - -
Year 1 3443866 -6561677 3443866 0.9434 3248930
Year 2 3969651 -2592026 7413517 0.89 3532975
Year 3 3973575 1381549 11387092 0.8396 3336290
Year 4 3241668 4623217 14628760 0.7921 2567705
TOTAL 14628760 12685900




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2680357

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Net Present Value
3. Profitability Index
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Partygaming Gambling shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Partygaming Gambling have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of The Ultimate Bluff: A Case Study Of Partygaming.com

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Partygaming Gambling often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Partygaming Gambling needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10005543) -10005543 - -
Year 1 3443866 -6561677 3443866 0.8696 2994666
Year 2 3969651 -2592026 7413517 0.7561 3001626
Year 3 3973575 1381549 11387092 0.6575 2612690
Year 4 3241668 4623217 14628760 0.5718 1853434
TOTAL 10462417


The Net NPV after 4 years is 456874

(10462417 - 10005543 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10005543) -10005543 - -
Year 1 3443866 -6561677 3443866 0.8333 2869888
Year 2 3969651 -2592026 7413517 0.6944 2756702
Year 3 3973575 1381549 11387092 0.5787 2299523
Year 4 3241668 4623217 14628760 0.4823 1563304
TOTAL 9489417


The Net NPV after 4 years is -516126

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9489417 - 10005543 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Partygaming Gambling to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Partygaming Gambling has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Partygaming Gambling can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Partygaming Gambling, then the stock price of the Partygaming Gambling should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Partygaming Gambling should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of The Ultimate Bluff: A Case Study Of Partygaming.com

References & Further Readings

Des Laffey (2018), "The Ultimate Bluff: A Case Study Of Partygaming.com Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Fuji Soft Inc SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Lesico SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Property Connect SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Hirata SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


Aberdeen Frontier Markets SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Tenryu Saw Mfg. SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


Italk Inc SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Emami SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Personal & Household Prods.