×




Liz Claiborne and the New Working Woman Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Liz Claiborne and the New Working Woman case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Liz Claiborne and the New Working Woman case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Anthony J. Mayo, Mark Benson. The Liz Claiborne and the New Working Woman (referred as “Claiborne Liz” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Collaboration, Customers, Demographics, Entrepreneurship, Leadership, Operations management, Strategy.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Liz Claiborne and the New Working Woman Case Study


At age 47, with two decades of experience as a lead designer for a Fortune 500 fashion company, Liz Claiborne put her life savings on the line to form Liz Claiborne, Inc., a partnership that included her husband. A decade later, in 1986, Claiborne was CEO of her own Fortune 500 company, reaching that milestone faster than any other business up to that point in history. Because the company did not own any of the factories that made its clothing, Claiborne relied upon her detailed understanding of design and manufacturing processes to instruct successfully her American and offshore contractors on how to mass-produce designer clothing at affordable prices. Claiborne was an industry pioneer in many ways. She developed detailed customer feedback collection systems. She and her staff were in frequent contact with department stores to help them present her clothing in display and to customers. In the 1980s, after building up her designer brand name, Claiborne expanded her business through licensing arrangements with quality manufacturers of apparel, shoes, and accessories.


Case Authors : Anthony J. Mayo, Mark Benson

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Collaboration, Customers, Demographics, Entrepreneurship, Leadership, Operations management, Strategy




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Liz Claiborne and the New Working Woman Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10020713) -10020713 - -
Year 1 3461139 -6559574 3461139 0.9434 3265225
Year 2 3962261 -2597313 7423400 0.89 3526398
Year 3 3964184 1366871 11387584 0.8396 3328405
Year 4 3235886 4602757 14623470 0.7921 2563125
TOTAL 14623470 12683154




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2662441

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Profitability Index
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Claiborne Liz shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Claiborne Liz have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Liz Claiborne and the New Working Woman

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Claiborne Liz often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Claiborne Liz needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10020713) -10020713 - -
Year 1 3461139 -6559574 3461139 0.8696 3009686
Year 2 3962261 -2597313 7423400 0.7561 2996039
Year 3 3964184 1366871 11387584 0.6575 2606515
Year 4 3235886 4602757 14623470 0.5718 1850128
TOTAL 10462368


The Net NPV after 4 years is 441655

(10462368 - 10020713 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10020713) -10020713 - -
Year 1 3461139 -6559574 3461139 0.8333 2884283
Year 2 3962261 -2597313 7423400 0.6944 2751570
Year 3 3964184 1366871 11387584 0.5787 2294088
Year 4 3235886 4602757 14623470 0.4823 1560516
TOTAL 9490457


The Net NPV after 4 years is -530256

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9490457 - 10020713 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Claiborne Liz to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Claiborne Liz has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Claiborne Liz can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Claiborne Liz, then the stock price of the Claiborne Liz should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Claiborne Liz should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Liz Claiborne and the New Working Woman

References & Further Readings

Anthony J. Mayo, Mark Benson (2018), "Liz Claiborne and the New Working Woman Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Dongguan Kingsun Optoelectron A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Furniture & Fixtures


TFI Intl SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Transportation , Air Courier


Ossia International Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Recreational Products


Yujiahui A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Personal & Household Prods.


Austindo Nusantara Jaya SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Nihon Yamamura Glass SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Containers & Packaging


Cisen Pharma SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs