×




Pulling the Goalie in Hockey Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Pulling the Goalie in Hockey case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Pulling the Goalie in Hockey case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Gregory S. Zaric, Michael Leff. The Pulling the Goalie in Hockey (referred as “Goalie Leafs” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Business models.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Pulling the Goalie in Hockey Case Study


The assistant coach of the Toronto Maple Leafs (Leafs), had just seen the team lose. In order to increase their chance of scoring, they had added a sixth offensive skater to the ice by sending their goaltender to the bench (known as "pulling the goalie") in the last 60 seconds of the game. Doing this did not give the team an advantage. In fact, a member of the opposite team was able to shoot the puck into the unguarded net, which cost the Leafs the game. The assistant coach had questioned whether the practice of pulling the goalie was a good one. He had also heard that models had been used to investigate strategies in sports. He wondered if mathematical modeling could be used to determine if pulling the goalie was a good strategy.


Case Authors : Gregory S. Zaric, Michael Leff

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Business models




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Pulling the Goalie in Hockey Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10005100) -10005100 - -
Year 1 3469688 -6535412 3469688 0.9434 3273291
Year 2 3957300 -2578112 7426988 0.89 3521983
Year 3 3965379 1387267 11392367 0.8396 3329409
Year 4 3229601 4616868 14621968 0.7921 2558146
TOTAL 14621968 12682829




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2677729

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Payback Period
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Goalie Leafs shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Goalie Leafs have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Pulling the Goalie in Hockey

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Goalie Leafs often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Goalie Leafs needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10005100) -10005100 - -
Year 1 3469688 -6535412 3469688 0.8696 3017120
Year 2 3957300 -2578112 7426988 0.7561 2992287
Year 3 3965379 1387267 11392367 0.6575 2607301
Year 4 3229601 4616868 14621968 0.5718 1846535
TOTAL 10463243


The Net NPV after 4 years is 458143

(10463243 - 10005100 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10005100) -10005100 - -
Year 1 3469688 -6535412 3469688 0.8333 2891407
Year 2 3957300 -2578112 7426988 0.6944 2748125
Year 3 3965379 1387267 11392367 0.5787 2294780
Year 4 3229601 4616868 14621968 0.4823 1557485
TOTAL 9491796


The Net NPV after 4 years is -513304

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9491796 - 10005100 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Goalie Leafs to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Goalie Leafs has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Goalie Leafs can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Goalie Leafs, then the stock price of the Goalie Leafs should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Goalie Leafs should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Pulling the Goalie in Hockey

References & Further Readings

Gregory S. Zaric, Michael Leff (2018), "Pulling the Goalie in Hockey Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Bharat Forge SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Misc. Fabricated Products


Global Invacom Group Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Communications Equipment


Ryder Capital Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Avio SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Abbey SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Shakti Pumps India Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


Therapy Cells Inc SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Sono-Tek Corp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods