×




Coach McKeever: Unorthodox Leadership Lessons from the Pool Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Coach McKeever: Unorthodox Leadership Lessons from the Pool case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Coach McKeever: Unorthodox Leadership Lessons from the Pool case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Holly Schroth. The Coach McKeever: Unorthodox Leadership Lessons from the Pool (referred as “Mckeever Motivational” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Gender, Innovation, Leadership, Managing people, Organizational culture.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Coach McKeever: Unorthodox Leadership Lessons from the Pool Case Study


University of California, Berkeley-Haas collectionThe case explores the remarkable rise of Coach Teri McKeever to the top of a sport traditionally dominated by male coaches. Her success is driven by an unorthodox leadership and motivational style that emphasizes a growth mindset of self-improvement. She is an influential innovator, mentor, and trailblazer who challenged long entrenched methods of training and overcame criticisms and setbacks to change the face of swim training today. "Coach McKeever (A): Unorthodox Leadership Lessons From the Pool" examines McKeever's leadership philosophy and controversial motivational strategies that she uses to develop and sustain high-level performers. Case A is designed to elicit discussion about how McKeever's leadership and motivational strategies can be applied to organizations today and how managers can use similar tools to develop high-performing employees in their organizations.


Case Authors : Holly Schroth

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Gender, Innovation, Leadership, Managing people, Organizational culture




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Coach McKeever: Unorthodox Leadership Lessons from the Pool Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10000587) -10000587 - -
Year 1 3461914 -6538673 3461914 0.9434 3265957
Year 2 3967436 -2571237 7429350 0.89 3531004
Year 3 3943432 1372195 11372782 0.8396 3310982
Year 4 3250213 4622408 14622995 0.7921 2574473
TOTAL 14622995 12682415




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2681828

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Net Present Value
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Mckeever Motivational shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Mckeever Motivational have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Coach McKeever: Unorthodox Leadership Lessons from the Pool

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Mckeever Motivational often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Mckeever Motivational needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10000587) -10000587 - -
Year 1 3461914 -6538673 3461914 0.8696 3010360
Year 2 3967436 -2571237 7429350 0.7561 2999952
Year 3 3943432 1372195 11372782 0.6575 2592871
Year 4 3250213 4622408 14622995 0.5718 1858320
TOTAL 10461502


The Net NPV after 4 years is 460915

(10461502 - 10000587 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10000587) -10000587 - -
Year 1 3461914 -6538673 3461914 0.8333 2884928
Year 2 3967436 -2571237 7429350 0.6944 2755164
Year 3 3943432 1372195 11372782 0.5787 2282079
Year 4 3250213 4622408 14622995 0.4823 1567425
TOTAL 9489596


The Net NPV after 4 years is -510991

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9489596 - 10000587 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Mckeever Motivational to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Mckeever Motivational has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Mckeever Motivational can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Mckeever Motivational, then the stock price of the Mckeever Motivational should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Mckeever Motivational should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Coach McKeever: Unorthodox Leadership Lessons from the Pool

References & Further Readings

Holly Schroth (2018), "Coach McKeever: Unorthodox Leadership Lessons from the Pool Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Vipul Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Hitachi SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Peripherals


Jeil Pharm SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


AtlasBX SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Dongbang Ship Machinery SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Misc. Fabricated Products


Asia Commercial SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Retail (Specialty)


Central Glass Co Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. - Supplies & Fixtures


Addus SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Healthcare Facilities


Selangor Dredging SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


Wheels India Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts