×




Coach Clark (A): It's Not About Winning. It's About Getting Better Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Coach Clark (A): It's Not About Winning. It's About Getting Better case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Coach Clark (A): It's Not About Winning. It's About Getting Better case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Holly Schroth. The Coach Clark (A): It's Not About Winning. It's About Getting Better (referred as “Clark Coach” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Leadership, Leading teams, Operations management.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Coach Clark (A): It's Not About Winning. It's About Getting Better Case Study


University of California, Berkeley-Haas collectionThis article describes the leadership style of Coach Jack Clark, under whose leadership Cal Rugby has won 21 national championships during the last 25 years. The article examines his leadership philosophy and strategies to create a high performance team culture. It discusses how his experiences as an athlete and businessman helped shape his approach to leading and developing teams. He cites the importance of good recruitment practices, setting expectations, constant performance feedback, managing conflict, and having a shared definition of leadership as keys factors to a successful team. In 2010, Clark faced a series of unprecedented challenges, including having his team downgraded from varsity to club status because of budget cuts. This article describes how he addressed these challenges. Please note: this case also has two supplementary cases available. The (B) and (C) supplements can be found using product numbers B674 and B675.


Case Authors : Holly Schroth

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Leadership, Leading teams, Operations management




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Coach Clark (A): It's Not About Winning. It's About Getting Better Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10028680) -10028680 - -
Year 1 3471282 -6557398 3471282 0.9434 3274794
Year 2 3979142 -2578256 7450424 0.89 3541422
Year 3 3971761 1393505 11422185 0.8396 3334767
Year 4 3251840 4645345 14674025 0.7921 2575762
TOTAL 14674025 12726746




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2698066

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Payback Period
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Clark Coach have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Clark Coach shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Coach Clark (A): It's Not About Winning. It's About Getting Better

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Clark Coach often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Clark Coach needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10028680) -10028680 - -
Year 1 3471282 -6557398 3471282 0.8696 3018506
Year 2 3979142 -2578256 7450424 0.7561 3008803
Year 3 3971761 1393505 11422185 0.6575 2611497
Year 4 3251840 4645345 14674025 0.5718 1859250
TOTAL 10498057


The Net NPV after 4 years is 469377

(10498057 - 10028680 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10028680) -10028680 - -
Year 1 3471282 -6557398 3471282 0.8333 2892735
Year 2 3979142 -2578256 7450424 0.6944 2763293
Year 3 3971761 1393505 11422185 0.5787 2298473
Year 4 3251840 4645345 14674025 0.4823 1568210
TOTAL 9522711


The Net NPV after 4 years is -505969

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9522711 - 10028680 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Clark Coach to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Clark Coach has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Clark Coach can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Clark Coach, then the stock price of the Clark Coach should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Clark Coach should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Coach Clark (A): It's Not About Winning. It's About Getting Better

References & Further Readings

Holly Schroth (2018), "Coach Clark (A): It's Not About Winning. It's About Getting Better Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Rexel SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


OI ON N1 SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Communications Services


LDT SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Semiconductors


Barak Valley Cements Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction - Raw Materials


Raymond Industrial SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Appliance & Tool


Minho M Bhd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Forestry & Wood Products


Hwacheon Machi SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


Korea Electric Terminal SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts


Golden Tobacco Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Tobacco


Nichias Corp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Fabricated Plastic & Rubber