×




Henry Tam and the MGI Team Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Henry Tam and the MGI Team case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Henry Tam and the MGI Team case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Jeffrey T. Polzer, Ingrid Vargas, Hillary Anger Elfenbein. The Henry Tam and the MGI Team (referred as “Tam Henry” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Collaboration, Communication, Conflict, Customers, Diversity, Entrepreneurship, IT, Leadership, Leading teams.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Henry Tam and the MGI Team Case Study


Within a short time frame, seven diverse team members assemble to write a business plan for a new company and struggle to define their roles, make decisions together, and resolve conflict. Henry Tam, a second-year Harvard MBA student, who joins an aspiring start-up company and a fellow classmate to enter the school's business plan contest. The founders of the company are two internationally accomplished musicians and a 1987 Harvard MBA, all Russian, who are trying to create, produce, and sell a unique computer-based music game. Conflict builds as the team generates a range of ideas about how to market their product, but has trouble agreeing on which ideas to pursue. Henry Tam wrestles with how to fix the problems that have hindered the team's progress.


Case Authors : Jeffrey T. Polzer, Ingrid Vargas, Hillary Anger Elfenbein

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Collaboration, Communication, Conflict, Customers, Diversity, Entrepreneurship, IT, Leadership, Leading teams




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Henry Tam and the MGI Team Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10029157) -10029157 - -
Year 1 3457698 -6571459 3457698 0.9434 3261979
Year 2 3971427 -2600032 7429125 0.89 3534556
Year 3 3945551 1345519 11374676 0.8396 3312761
Year 4 3234674 4580193 14609350 0.7921 2562165
TOTAL 14609350 12671461




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2642304

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Payback Period
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Tam Henry shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Tam Henry have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Henry Tam and the MGI Team

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Tam Henry often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Tam Henry needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10029157) -10029157 - -
Year 1 3457698 -6571459 3457698 0.8696 3006694
Year 2 3971427 -2600032 7429125 0.7561 3002969
Year 3 3945551 1345519 11374676 0.6575 2594264
Year 4 3234674 4580193 14609350 0.5718 1849435
TOTAL 10453362


The Net NPV after 4 years is 424205

(10453362 - 10029157 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10029157) -10029157 - -
Year 1 3457698 -6571459 3457698 0.8333 2881415
Year 2 3971427 -2600032 7429125 0.6944 2757935
Year 3 3945551 1345519 11374676 0.5787 2283305
Year 4 3234674 4580193 14609350 0.4823 1559932
TOTAL 9482587


The Net NPV after 4 years is -546570

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9482587 - 10029157 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Tam Henry to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Tam Henry has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Tam Henry can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Tam Henry, then the stock price of the Tam Henry should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Tam Henry should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Henry Tam and the MGI Team

References & Further Readings

Jeffrey T. Polzer, Ingrid Vargas, Hillary Anger Elfenbein (2018), "Henry Tam and the MGI Team Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Aegon SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Insurance (Life)


STW Resources SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Waste Management Services


Knosys Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Renault SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Manufacturers


SMS Lifesciences SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Akers Biosciences SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Willy Food SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing