×




Feedback: The Broken Loop in Higher Education - and How to Fix It Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Feedback: The Broken Loop in Higher Education - and How to Fix It case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Feedback: The Broken Loop in Higher Education - and How to Fix It case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Mihnea C. Moldoveanu, Maja Djikic. The Feedback: The Broken Loop in Higher Education - and How to Fix It (referred as “Behaviour Feedback” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, .

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Feedback: The Broken Loop in Higher Education - and How to Fix It Case Study


When we want to learn a new skill in life, we try out a new behaviour. Some behaviours fulfill their intended purpose; others do not. Feedback-signals from the environment that tell us whether or not the behaviour we produced had the intended effect-is essential to changing, adapting or modifying human behaviour. That's what learning is all about. Learning theorists and practitioners agree that feedback is a prime enabler of learning. Yet in higher education, it is spotty, ill-timed or utterly missing. The authors-who head up the Self-Development Lab at the University of Toronto-show what can be done about it.


Case Authors : Mihnea C. Moldoveanu, Maja Djikic

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas :




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Feedback: The Broken Loop in Higher Education - and How to Fix It Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10021117) -10021117 - -
Year 1 3456465 -6564652 3456465 0.9434 3260816
Year 2 3956815 -2607837 7413280 0.89 3521551
Year 3 3975751 1367914 11389031 0.8396 3338117
Year 4 3234116 4602030 14623147 0.7921 2561723
TOTAL 14623147 12682207




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2661090

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Payback Period
3. Profitability Index
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Behaviour Feedback have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Behaviour Feedback shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Feedback: The Broken Loop in Higher Education - and How to Fix It

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Behaviour Feedback often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Behaviour Feedback needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10021117) -10021117 - -
Year 1 3456465 -6564652 3456465 0.8696 3005622
Year 2 3956815 -2607837 7413280 0.7561 2991921
Year 3 3975751 1367914 11389031 0.6575 2614121
Year 4 3234116 4602030 14623147 0.5718 1849116
TOTAL 10460779


The Net NPV after 4 years is 439662

(10460779 - 10021117 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10021117) -10021117 - -
Year 1 3456465 -6564652 3456465 0.8333 2880388
Year 2 3956815 -2607837 7413280 0.6944 2747788
Year 3 3975751 1367914 11389031 0.5787 2300782
Year 4 3234116 4602030 14623147 0.4823 1559662
TOTAL 9488620


The Net NPV after 4 years is -532497

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9488620 - 10021117 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Behaviour Feedback to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Behaviour Feedback has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Behaviour Feedback can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Behaviour Feedback, then the stock price of the Behaviour Feedback should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Behaviour Feedback should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Feedback: The Broken Loop in Higher Education - and How to Fix It

References & Further Readings

Mihnea C. Moldoveanu, Maja Djikic (2018), "Feedback: The Broken Loop in Higher Education - and How to Fix It Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Treasury Wine Estates SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Beverages (Alcoholic)


Toenec Corp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


ACT SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Zhongnongfa Seed SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Benjamin Hornigold SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


CFT SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


Imuraya Group SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Aqua Metals Inc SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Metal Mining


Bombardier A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Aerospace & Defense


Brainsway SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Healthcare Facilities


GCP SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Seah Spe Steel SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. - Supplies & Fixtures