×




The Canadian Television Industry Confronts Subscription Video on Demand Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for The Canadian Television Industry Confronts Subscription Video on Demand case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. The Canadian Television Industry Confronts Subscription Video on Demand case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Adam Fremeth, Rod E. White, Kartik Rao. The The Canadian Television Industry Confronts Subscription Video on Demand (referred as “Incumbent Players” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, .

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of The Canadian Television Industry Confronts Subscription Video on Demand Case Study


In late 2015, developments in the Canadian television industry led the incumbent players to reconsider their traditional distribution strategies. The conflux of changes to technology, regulatory reforms, and consumption patterns was complicated by the entry of new players, forcing established firms to consider revising their business models. The regulated oligopolistic industry structure that once protected the players and ensured superior performance was under attack from many directions. The Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission, which regulated the incumbent players, was pushing for reforms, yet the ramifications of such changes remained unclear. The incumbents responded to the advent of subscription video on demand services that were enabled by widespread high-speed Internet access, the entry of new non-traditional competitors, and changing regulations. How would the industry evolve? What was the role of the regulator? How would customers respond to the new delivery options? How would the incumbent firms, the regulator, technology providers, and content developers and providers reconcile their ambiguous relationships?


Case Authors : Adam Fremeth, Rod E. White, Kartik Rao

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas :




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for The Canadian Television Industry Confronts Subscription Video on Demand Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10010504) -10010504 - -
Year 1 3454479 -6556025 3454479 0.9434 3258942
Year 2 3963516 -2592509 7417995 0.89 3527515
Year 3 3944154 1351645 11362149 0.8396 3311588
Year 4 3242910 4594555 14605059 0.7921 2568688
TOTAL 14605059 12666734




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2656230

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Payback Period
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Incumbent Players have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Incumbent Players shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of The Canadian Television Industry Confronts Subscription Video on Demand

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Incumbent Players often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Incumbent Players needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10010504) -10010504 - -
Year 1 3454479 -6556025 3454479 0.8696 3003895
Year 2 3963516 -2592509 7417995 0.7561 2996988
Year 3 3944154 1351645 11362149 0.6575 2593345
Year 4 3242910 4594555 14605059 0.5718 1854144
TOTAL 10448372


The Net NPV after 4 years is 437868

(10448372 - 10010504 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10010504) -10010504 - -
Year 1 3454479 -6556025 3454479 0.8333 2878733
Year 2 3963516 -2592509 7417995 0.6944 2752442
Year 3 3944154 1351645 11362149 0.5787 2282497
Year 4 3242910 4594555 14605059 0.4823 1563903
TOTAL 9477574


The Net NPV after 4 years is -532930

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9477574 - 10010504 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Incumbent Players to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Incumbent Players has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Incumbent Players can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Incumbent Players, then the stock price of the Incumbent Players should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Incumbent Players should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of The Canadian Television Industry Confronts Subscription Video on Demand

References & Further Readings

Adam Fremeth, Rod E. White, Kartik Rao (2018), "The Canadian Television Industry Confronts Subscription Video on Demand Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Castle Brands Inc SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Beverages (Alcoholic)


Shenzhen Chiwan Wharf SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Transportation , Misc. Transportation


IPC Corporation Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Regina Miracle Intl SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Apparel/Accessories


Sacoil SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas Operations


Piper Jaffray SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


TAG Oil SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas Operations