×




Managing the Sibling Partnership: The Ong Group Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Managing the Sibling Partnership: The Ong Group case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Managing the Sibling Partnership: The Ong Group case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Marleen Dieleman. The Managing the Sibling Partnership: The Ong Group (referred as “Siblings Ong” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Risk management.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Managing the Sibling Partnership: The Ong Group Case Study


In 2016, the oldest member of the family business The Ong Group was concerned about the ailing firm that he and his siblings were running. The business had been started in 1957 in Hong Kong by their father. After the death of the father and one of the siblings, the remaining family members needed a plan for the future of the business. Should all of the remaining siblings and their children be allowed to become directors in the family firm? How could they create a workable governance structure that would help the family make the right decisions? How would they put the business back on track? Marleen Dieleman is affiliated with National University of Singapore.


Case Authors : Marleen Dieleman

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Risk management




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Managing the Sibling Partnership: The Ong Group Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10023948) -10023948 - -
Year 1 3466036 -6557912 3466036 0.9434 3269845
Year 2 3957135 -2600777 7423171 0.89 3521836
Year 3 3936458 1335681 11359629 0.8396 3305126
Year 4 3235780 4571461 14595409 0.7921 2563041
TOTAL 14595409 12659848




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2635900

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Net Present Value
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Siblings Ong have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Siblings Ong shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Managing the Sibling Partnership: The Ong Group

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Siblings Ong often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Siblings Ong needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10023948) -10023948 - -
Year 1 3466036 -6557912 3466036 0.8696 3013944
Year 2 3957135 -2600777 7423171 0.7561 2992163
Year 3 3936458 1335681 11359629 0.6575 2588285
Year 4 3235780 4571461 14595409 0.5718 1850068
TOTAL 10444460


The Net NPV after 4 years is 420512

(10444460 - 10023948 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10023948) -10023948 - -
Year 1 3466036 -6557912 3466036 0.8333 2888363
Year 2 3957135 -2600777 7423171 0.6944 2748010
Year 3 3936458 1335681 11359629 0.5787 2278043
Year 4 3235780 4571461 14595409 0.4823 1560465
TOTAL 9474881


The Net NPV after 4 years is -549067

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9474881 - 10023948 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Siblings Ong to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Siblings Ong has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Siblings Ong can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Siblings Ong, then the stock price of the Siblings Ong should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Siblings Ong should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Managing the Sibling Partnership: The Ong Group

References & Further Readings

Marleen Dieleman (2018), "Managing the Sibling Partnership: The Ong Group Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Bulova Technologies SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Aerospace & Defense


Cuchen SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Misc. Fabricated Products


HB Stockholdings SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


Piolax Inc SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts


Wacom Co Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Peripherals


MannKind SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Medius SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Medical Equipment & Supplies


Imperial Brands SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Tobacco


Luceco SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Protective Insurance B SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Insurance (Prop. & Casualty)


AAC Holdings SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Healthcare Facilities