×




Roustam Tariko, Russian Entrepreneur: An Iconoclast in a Maelstrom Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Roustam Tariko, Russian Entrepreneur: An Iconoclast in a Maelstrom case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Roustam Tariko, Russian Entrepreneur: An Iconoclast in a Maelstrom case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Elizabeth Florent-Treacy, Manfred F.R. Kets de Vries, Pavel Pavlovsky. The Roustam Tariko, Russian Entrepreneur: An Iconoclast in a Maelstrom (referred as “Entrepreneurial Entrepreneura” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Entrepreneurship, Ethics, IT.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Roustam Tariko, Russian Entrepreneur: An Iconoclast in a Maelstrom Case Study


This case looks at entrepreneurial leadership and business development on several levels. It addresses issues that typically arise in new ventures and bricks to clicks transformation, including: evolution from the messy start-up stage to a more professional organization; entrepreneurship and internal incubators; strategies for continued growth and diversification; and brand management and marketing. It also looks closely at entrepreneurship in the very complex political and economic environment in Russia, and analyses the way past history and culture influence the course of an entrepreneurial organization's development insights which can be applied to organizations in other Eastern European countries. Finally, the case is a chronicle of a founder-entrepreneurA?s hopes, fears and impressions, an intimate look at the birth and growth of an entrepreneurial organization.


Case Authors : Elizabeth Florent-Treacy, Manfred F.R. Kets de Vries, Pavel Pavlovsky

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Entrepreneurship, Ethics, IT




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Roustam Tariko, Russian Entrepreneur: An Iconoclast in a Maelstrom Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10023545) -10023545 - -
Year 1 3456623 -6566922 3456623 0.9434 3260965
Year 2 3982070 -2584852 7438693 0.89 3544028
Year 3 3961539 1376687 11400232 0.8396 3326185
Year 4 3240808 4617495 14641040 0.7921 2567023
TOTAL 14641040 12698201




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2674656

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Profitability Index
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Entrepreneurial Entrepreneura have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Entrepreneurial Entrepreneura shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Roustam Tariko, Russian Entrepreneur: An Iconoclast in a Maelstrom

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Entrepreneurial Entrepreneura often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Entrepreneurial Entrepreneura needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10023545) -10023545 - -
Year 1 3456623 -6566922 3456623 0.8696 3005759
Year 2 3982070 -2584852 7438693 0.7561 3011017
Year 3 3961539 1376687 11400232 0.6575 2604776
Year 4 3240808 4617495 14641040 0.5718 1852942
TOTAL 10474495


The Net NPV after 4 years is 450950

(10474495 - 10023545 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10023545) -10023545 - -
Year 1 3456623 -6566922 3456623 0.8333 2880519
Year 2 3982070 -2584852 7438693 0.6944 2765326
Year 3 3961539 1376687 11400232 0.5787 2292557
Year 4 3240808 4617495 14641040 0.4823 1562890
TOTAL 9501293


The Net NPV after 4 years is -522252

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9501293 - 10023545 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Entrepreneurial Entrepreneura to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Entrepreneurial Entrepreneura has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Entrepreneurial Entrepreneura can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Entrepreneurial Entrepreneura, then the stock price of the Entrepreneurial Entrepreneura should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Entrepreneurial Entrepreneura should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Roustam Tariko, Russian Entrepreneur: An Iconoclast in a Maelstrom

References & Further Readings

Elizabeth Florent-Treacy, Manfred F.R. Kets de Vries, Pavel Pavlovsky (2018), "Roustam Tariko, Russian Entrepreneur: An Iconoclast in a Maelstrom Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Seoulin Bioscience SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Chemical SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Regional Banks


Sinomach Automobile SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Manufacturers


American Axle&Manufacturing SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts


Image Resources NL SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction - Raw Materials


Actoz Soft SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Services


CRG Holdings SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Business Services


JKX Oil SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas Operations


Kinx SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Communications Equipment