×




CNOOC: Building a World-Class Energy Company Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for CNOOC: Building a World-Class Energy Company case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. CNOOC: Building a World-Class Energy Company case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Joseph L. Bower, Nancy Hua Dai, Michael Shih-ta Chen. The CNOOC: Building a World-Class Energy Company (referred as “Cnooc Offshore” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Corporate governance, Government, International business, Leadership, Leadership development, Organizational culture.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of CNOOC: Building a World-Class Energy Company Case Study


To maximize their effectiveness, color cases should be printed in color.Fu Chengyu is the fifth CEO to lead China National Offshore Oil Company - an SOE founded in 1982 to exploit Chinese offshore deposits. In 2010 he is trying to decide how to drive further growth in a company that has grown 556 times in less than 30 years, with profits grown 2600 times. He believes that the way CNOOC has been managed, a blend of market orientation and concern for employees and the nation has contributed importantly to the success. His challenge is to allocate resources among new areas to explore for petroleum and new sources of energy, and to develop managers with the capability of leading those businesses in the face of world class competitors. Both technical talent and the ability to integrate the efforts of non-Chinese leaders are involved.


Case Authors : Joseph L. Bower, Nancy Hua Dai, Michael Shih-ta Chen

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Corporate governance, Government, International business, Leadership, Leadership development, Organizational culture




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for CNOOC: Building a World-Class Energy Company Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10018297) -10018297 - -
Year 1 3458556 -6559741 3458556 0.9434 3262789
Year 2 3974360 -2585381 7432916 0.89 3537166
Year 3 3967035 1381654 11399951 0.8396 3330799
Year 4 3250760 4632414 14650711 0.7921 2574906
TOTAL 14650711 12705660




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2687363

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Profitability Index
3. Net Present Value
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Cnooc Offshore have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Cnooc Offshore shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of CNOOC: Building a World-Class Energy Company

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Cnooc Offshore often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Cnooc Offshore needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10018297) -10018297 - -
Year 1 3458556 -6559741 3458556 0.8696 3007440
Year 2 3974360 -2585381 7432916 0.7561 3005187
Year 3 3967035 1381654 11399951 0.6575 2608390
Year 4 3250760 4632414 14650711 0.5718 1858633
TOTAL 10479650


The Net NPV after 4 years is 461353

(10479650 - 10018297 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10018297) -10018297 - -
Year 1 3458556 -6559741 3458556 0.8333 2882130
Year 2 3974360 -2585381 7432916 0.6944 2759972
Year 3 3967035 1381654 11399951 0.5787 2295738
Year 4 3250760 4632414 14650711 0.4823 1567689
TOTAL 9505529


The Net NPV after 4 years is -512768

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9505529 - 10018297 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Cnooc Offshore to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Cnooc Offshore has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Cnooc Offshore can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Cnooc Offshore, then the stock price of the Cnooc Offshore should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Cnooc Offshore should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of CNOOC: Building a World-Class Energy Company

References & Further Readings

Joseph L. Bower, Nancy Hua Dai, Michael Shih-ta Chen (2018), "CNOOC: Building a World-Class Energy Company Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


UMC Electronics Co SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts


ZhongMan Petroleum A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil Well Services & Equipment


Tikforce SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Caely SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Apparel/Accessories


OVS SPA SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Apparel/Accessories


Muar Ban Lee Group Bhd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


AFFIN SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Regional Banks


Bulova Technologies SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Aerospace & Defense