×




BIG BEER: INBEV VS. ANHEUSER BUSCH Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for BIG BEER: INBEV VS. ANHEUSER BUSCH case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. BIG BEER: INBEV VS. ANHEUSER BUSCH case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Nuno Fernandes, Patricia Santos. The BIG BEER: INBEV VS. ANHEUSER BUSCH (referred as “Busch Anheuser” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Marketing, Mergers & acquisitions.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of BIG BEER: INBEV VS. ANHEUSER BUSCH Case Study


This merger case puts face to face a team of negotiators representing InBev and another representing Anheuser Busch (AB). These teams have to negotiate on a potential acquisition of AB. Therefore, this case is much broader than just an exercise in valuation or finance. Learning objectives: This case will challenge participants on negotiation techniques, strategic analysis, working with a team, working "against" a team, present a deal in public and many other things.


Case Authors : Nuno Fernandes, Patricia Santos

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Marketing, Mergers & acquisitions




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for BIG BEER: INBEV VS. ANHEUSER BUSCH Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10028475) -10028475 - -
Year 1 3467031 -6561444 3467031 0.9434 3270784
Year 2 3956268 -2605176 7423299 0.89 3521064
Year 3 3962184 1357008 11385483 0.8396 3326726
Year 4 3249263 4606271 14634746 0.7921 2573721
TOTAL 14634746 12692295




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2663820

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Profitability Index
3. Payback Period
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Busch Anheuser have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Busch Anheuser shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of BIG BEER: INBEV VS. ANHEUSER BUSCH

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Busch Anheuser often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Busch Anheuser needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10028475) -10028475 - -
Year 1 3467031 -6561444 3467031 0.8696 3014810
Year 2 3956268 -2605176 7423299 0.7561 2991507
Year 3 3962184 1357008 11385483 0.6575 2605200
Year 4 3249263 4606271 14634746 0.5718 1857777
TOTAL 10469294


The Net NPV after 4 years is 440819

(10469294 - 10028475 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10028475) -10028475 - -
Year 1 3467031 -6561444 3467031 0.8333 2889193
Year 2 3956268 -2605176 7423299 0.6944 2747408
Year 3 3962184 1357008 11385483 0.5787 2292931
Year 4 3249263 4606271 14634746 0.4823 1566967
TOTAL 9496498


The Net NPV after 4 years is -531977

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9496498 - 10028475 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Busch Anheuser to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Busch Anheuser has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Busch Anheuser can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Busch Anheuser, then the stock price of the Busch Anheuser should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Busch Anheuser should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of BIG BEER: INBEV VS. ANHEUSER BUSCH

References & Further Readings

Nuno Fernandes, Patricia Santos (2018), "BIG BEER: INBEV VS. ANHEUSER BUSCH Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.

Explore More

Feel free to connect with us if you need business research.

You can download Excel Template of Case Study Solution & Analysis of BIG BEER: INBEV VS. ANHEUSER BUSCH


Asia Paper SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Paper & Paper Products


Shanxi Xinghuacun Fen Wine SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Beverages (Alcoholic)


Aizawa Securities SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


Hankuk Carbon SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Containers & Packaging


Bluechiip Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Medical Equipment & Supplies


Cheuk Nang SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


Risen Energy SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Semiconductors


Cuckoo Electr SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Appliance & Tool


TPL Plastech Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemicals - Plastics & Rubber


Takadakiko Steel Constr SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Cake Box SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing