×




James vs. United States Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for James vs. United States case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. James vs. United States case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Henry B. Reiling. The James vs. United States (referred as “Supreme Court” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Finance & Accounting. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Decision making, Ethics, Policy.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of James vs. United States Case Study


The U.S. Supreme Court reconsiders two basically inconsistent prior Supreme Court decisions, overrules one and states that illegally acquired income must be reported.


Case Authors : Henry B. Reiling

Topic : Finance & Accounting

Related Areas : Decision making, Ethics, Policy




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for James vs. United States Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10002805) -10002805 - -
Year 1 3465225 -6537580 3465225 0.9434 3269080
Year 2 3975589 -2561991 7440814 0.89 3538260
Year 3 3964293 1402302 11405107 0.8396 3328497
Year 4 3225803 4628105 14630910 0.7921 2555138
TOTAL 14630910 12690975




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2688170

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Profitability Index
3. Net Present Value
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Supreme Court have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Supreme Court shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of James vs. United States

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Finance & Accounting Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Supreme Court often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Supreme Court needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10002805) -10002805 - -
Year 1 3465225 -6537580 3465225 0.8696 3013239
Year 2 3975589 -2561991 7440814 0.7561 3006116
Year 3 3964293 1402302 11405107 0.6575 2606587
Year 4 3225803 4628105 14630910 0.5718 1844363
TOTAL 10470306


The Net NPV after 4 years is 467501

(10470306 - 10002805 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10002805) -10002805 - -
Year 1 3465225 -6537580 3465225 0.8333 2887688
Year 2 3975589 -2561991 7440814 0.6944 2760826
Year 3 3964293 1402302 11405107 0.5787 2294151
Year 4 3225803 4628105 14630910 0.4823 1555653
TOTAL 9498318


The Net NPV after 4 years is -504487

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9498318 - 10002805 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Supreme Court to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Supreme Court has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Supreme Court can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Supreme Court, then the stock price of the Supreme Court should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Supreme Court should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of James vs. United States

References & Further Readings

Henry B. Reiling (2018), "James vs. United States Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


BHP Billiton Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Metal Mining


Orchid Isla SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Epazz Inc SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Univance SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts


Tilon SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Services


Samty Residential SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


Shenyang Jinshan SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Utilities , Electric Utilities


Gabriel Resources SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Gold & Silver


Samsung Securities SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


Tembo Gold Corp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Gold & Silver


House Do SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


Toyo Sugar Refining SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing