×




"RENOVATING HOME DEPOT: 2000-2006 Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for "RENOVATING HOME DEPOT: 2000-2006 case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. "RENOVATING HOME DEPOT: 2000-2006 case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Jean-Francois Manzoni, Jean-Louis Barsoux. The "RENOVATING HOME DEPOT: 2000-2006 (referred as “Coping One's” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Communication, Customer service, Financial markets, Leadership, Strategy.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of "RENOVATING HOME DEPOT: 2000-2006 Case Study


This is the case of a leader who came into a hugely successful company only to find out that it lacked basic systems and was running out of growth opportunities in its existing markets. Though a non-retailer, he had a lot of experience in different businesses and learned quickly.Having diagnosed the situation, he made overdue investments in systems and brought in new blood from outside, instilling new discipline, capabilities and operational efficiencies. Over five years, he managed to transform this seat-of-the-pants operation into a much more robust company, while at the same time continuing to deliver solid financial results. He also repositioned the company for growth in markets where there was little serious competition. These were considerable accomplishments for which he gained belated recognition. Yet, there were nagging concerns throughout his tenure: doubts from analysts about where he was taking the company; criticism from former executives that he was killing the entrepreneurial culture; question marks over the morale of store employees; complaints about customer service; and public disapproval for his expanding remuneration package. These issues came to a head in his sixth year in the job and specifically at a badly misjudged annual meeting with shareholders. Ultimately, he stopped listening to dissenting voices, and made a dreadful blunder - from which his reputation never quite recovered. Learning objectives: The case covers four key leadership issues: 1) The complexity of leading a large company - and the 3 critical roles required of leaders - as strategists, architects and mobilizers. 2) The difficulty of transforming a successful organization - and how to make the case for change in such a company. 3) The need to manage one's own competencies - and the dangers of carrying certain strengths too far: e.g. when does demanding become intimidating and when does self-confidence become stubbornness? 4) The need to manage oneself over time - particularly in terms of maintaining one's ability to listen, as well as coping with disappointment and coping with criticism.


Case Authors : Jean-Francois Manzoni, Jean-Louis Barsoux

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Communication, Customer service, Financial markets, Leadership, Strategy




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for "RENOVATING HOME DEPOT: 2000-2006 Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10009228) -10009228 - -
Year 1 3466784 -6542444 3466784 0.9434 3270551
Year 2 3959670 -2582774 7426454 0.89 3524092
Year 3 3947721 1364947 11374175 0.8396 3314583
Year 4 3230804 4595751 14604979 0.7921 2559099
TOTAL 14604979 12668325




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2659097

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Profitability Index
3. Net Present Value
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Coping One's shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Coping One's have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of "RENOVATING HOME DEPOT: 2000-2006

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Coping One's often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Coping One's needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10009228) -10009228 - -
Year 1 3466784 -6542444 3466784 0.8696 3014595
Year 2 3959670 -2582774 7426454 0.7561 2994079
Year 3 3947721 1364947 11374175 0.6575 2595691
Year 4 3230804 4595751 14604979 0.5718 1847223
TOTAL 10451587


The Net NPV after 4 years is 442359

(10451587 - 10009228 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10009228) -10009228 - -
Year 1 3466784 -6542444 3466784 0.8333 2888987
Year 2 3959670 -2582774 7426454 0.6944 2749771
Year 3 3947721 1364947 11374175 0.5787 2284561
Year 4 3230804 4595751 14604979 0.4823 1558065
TOTAL 9481383


The Net NPV after 4 years is -527845

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9481383 - 10009228 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Coping One's to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Coping One's has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Coping One's can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Coping One's, then the stock price of the Coping One's should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Coping One's should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of "RENOVATING HOME DEPOT: 2000-2006

References & Further Readings

Jean-Francois Manzoni, Jean-Louis Barsoux (2018), ""RENOVATING HOME DEPOT: 2000-2006 Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


HopFed SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Regional Banks


China Yurun Food SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Fish/Livestock


CareNet SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Business Services


Wngjin Thinkbi SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Printing & Publishing


Mahkota SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Dongyang Piston SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts


Comtech SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Communications Equipment