×




Competing in Network Markets: Can the Winner Take All? Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Competing in Network Markets: Can the Winner Take All? case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Competing in Network Markets: Can the Winner Take All? case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by David Mclntyre, Asda Chintakananda. The Competing in Network Markets: Can the Winner Take All? (referred as “Network Markets” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Economics, Innovation, Marketing, Networking, Technology.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Competing in Network Markets: Can the Winner Take All? Case Study


Products as varied as software, credit cards, and even coffee makers are influenced by network effects whereby the product's value is contingent upon the number of people using it. In turn, markets for these products offer lucrative returns to managers who can leverage the dynamics in their favor. This article describes recent research focusing on the factors that influence success and failure in network markets. We offer recommendations and initiatives that increase the likelihood of success in network markets for entrepreneurs and incumbents alike.


Case Authors : David Mclntyre, Asda Chintakananda

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Economics, Innovation, Marketing, Networking, Technology




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Competing in Network Markets: Can the Winner Take All? Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10015355) -10015355 - -
Year 1 3449386 -6565969 3449386 0.9434 3254138
Year 2 3982779 -2583190 7432165 0.89 3544659
Year 3 3946560 1363370 11378725 0.8396 3313608
Year 4 3233395 4596765 14612120 0.7921 2561152
TOTAL 14612120 12673556




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2658201

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Payback Period
3. Profitability Index
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Network Markets shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Network Markets have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Competing in Network Markets: Can the Winner Take All?

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Network Markets often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Network Markets needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10015355) -10015355 - -
Year 1 3449386 -6565969 3449386 0.8696 2999466
Year 2 3982779 -2583190 7432165 0.7561 3011553
Year 3 3946560 1363370 11378725 0.6575 2594927
Year 4 3233395 4596765 14612120 0.5718 1848704
TOTAL 10454651


The Net NPV after 4 years is 439296

(10454651 - 10015355 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10015355) -10015355 - -
Year 1 3449386 -6565969 3449386 0.8333 2874488
Year 2 3982779 -2583190 7432165 0.6944 2765819
Year 3 3946560 1363370 11378725 0.5787 2283889
Year 4 3233395 4596765 14612120 0.4823 1559315
TOTAL 9483511


The Net NPV after 4 years is -531844

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9483511 - 10015355 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Network Markets to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Network Markets has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Network Markets can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Network Markets, then the stock price of the Network Markets should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Network Markets should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Competing in Network Markets: Can the Winner Take All?

References & Further Readings

David Mclntyre, Asda Chintakananda (2018), "Competing in Network Markets: Can the Winner Take All? Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Hyundai C F Inc SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Hash Labs SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Services


Exillon SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas Operations


Ningbo Yak Tech A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Textiles - Non Apparel


Gihon Telekom SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Communications Services


Jiangyin Haida A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Fabricated Plastic & Rubber


SMISoration Bhd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts


Hangzhou SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Bonterra Energy SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas Operations


Evolution Mining SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Gold & Silver