Interim Succession: Temporary Leadership in the Midst of the Perfect Storm Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Interim Succession: Temporary Leadership in the Midst of the Perfect Storm case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Interim Succession: Temporary Leadership in the Midst of the Perfect Storm case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Christine H. Mooney, Matthew Semadeni, Idalene F. Kesner. The Interim Succession: Temporary Leadership in the Midst of the Perfect Storm (referred as “Interim Successions” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Strategic planning, Succession planning.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

---

Case Description of Interim Succession: Temporary Leadership in the Midst of the Perfect Storm Case Study

The corporate governance environment has changed. The rate of CEO successions is naturally trending up, succession planning is in dire need of repair, and boards are under increasing pressure to focus on oversight. This confluence of events creates a 'perfect storm.' Within this new environment, interim successions are on the rise. But is it all bad news? This article explores the decision of corporate directors to use temporary chief executive officers (CEOs) and the roles served by these interim leaders. We include a typology of interim CEOs and prescribe the contexts in which organizations can strategically pursue this type of succession. We conclude with a list of recommendations for how boards can most effectively manage interim leadership in the new corporate governance environment.

Case Authors : Christine H. Mooney, Matthew Semadeni, Idalene F. Kesner

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Strategic planning, Succession planning

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Interim Succession: Temporary Leadership in the Midst of the Perfect Storm Case Study

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 6 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10008422)	-10008422	-	-
Year 1	3459644	-6548778	3459644	0.9434	3263815
Year 2	3977523	-2571255	7437167	0.89	3539981
Year 3	3963170	1391915	11400337	0.8396	3327554
Year 4	3231261	4623176	14631598	0.7921	2559461
TOTAL			14631598		12690812

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2682390

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

---

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Profitability Index
3. Net Present Value
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Interim Successions shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Interim Successions have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.

---

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Interim Succession: Temporary Leadership in the Midst of the Perfect Storm

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Interim Successions often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Interim Successions needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 15 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10008422)	-10008422	-	-
Year 1	3459644	-6548778	3459644	0.8696	3008386
Year 2	3977523	-2571255	7437167	0.7561	3007579
Year 3	3963170	1391915	11400337	0.6575	2605849
Year 4	3231261	4623176	14631598	0.5718	1847484
TOTAL					10469297

The Net NPV after 4 years is 460875

(10469297 - 10008422 )

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 20 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10008422)	-10008422	-	-
Year 1	3459644	-6548778	3459644	0.8333	2883037
Year 2	3977523	-2571255	7437167	0.6944	2762169
Year 3	3963170	1391915	11400337	0.5787	2293501
Year 4	3231261	4623176	14631598	0.4823	1558286
TOTAL					9496992

The Net NPV after 4 years is -511430

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9496992 - 10008422 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Interim Successions to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Interim Successions has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Interim Successions can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Interim Successions, then the stock price of the Interim Successions should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Interim Successions should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

---

Negotiation Strategy of Interim Succession: Temporary Leadership in the Midst of the Perfect Storm

References & Further Readings

Christine H. Mooney, Matthew Semadeni, Idalene F. Kesner (2018), "Interim Succession: Temporary Leadership in the Midst of the Perfect Storm Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.