×




Tom Kalil, Deputy Director for Technology & Innovation Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Tom Kalil, Deputy Director for Technology & Innovation case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Tom Kalil, Deputy Director for Technology & Innovation case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Linda A. Hill, Allison J. Wigen. The Tom Kalil, Deputy Director for Technology & Innovation (referred as “Kalil Innovation” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Entrepreneurship, Innovation, Joint ventures, Leadership, Networking, Policy, Talent management, Technology.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Tom Kalil, Deputy Director for Technology & Innovation Case Study


This case explores the role of Tom Kalil as Deputy Director for Technology & Innovation at the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy. With the end of President Obama's Administration drawing near, Kalil and his team of "policy entrepreneurs" must work to build an ecosystem of individuals and organizations both inside and outside the Federal government, if they hope to see their science & technology initiatves continue into the next Administration. The case allows for discussion of: leading innovation ecosystems; building public-private and public-public collaborations; leading system innovation; talent management and development; and public sector innovation.


Case Authors : Linda A. Hill, Allison J. Wigen

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Entrepreneurship, Innovation, Joint ventures, Leadership, Networking, Policy, Talent management, Technology




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Tom Kalil, Deputy Director for Technology & Innovation Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10012905) -10012905 - -
Year 1 3456363 -6556542 3456363 0.9434 3260720
Year 2 3969070 -2587472 7425433 0.89 3532458
Year 3 3937231 1349759 11362664 0.8396 3305775
Year 4 3228556 4578315 14591220 0.7921 2557319
TOTAL 14591220 12656272




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2643367

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Profitability Index
3. Payback Period
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Kalil Innovation shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Kalil Innovation have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Tom Kalil, Deputy Director for Technology & Innovation

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Kalil Innovation often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Kalil Innovation needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10012905) -10012905 - -
Year 1 3456363 -6556542 3456363 0.8696 3005533
Year 2 3969070 -2587472 7425433 0.7561 3001187
Year 3 3937231 1349759 11362664 0.6575 2588793
Year 4 3228556 4578315 14591220 0.5718 1845937
TOTAL 10441451


The Net NPV after 4 years is 428546

(10441451 - 10012905 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10012905) -10012905 - -
Year 1 3456363 -6556542 3456363 0.8333 2880303
Year 2 3969070 -2587472 7425433 0.6944 2756299
Year 3 3937231 1349759 11362664 0.5787 2278490
Year 4 3228556 4578315 14591220 0.4823 1556981
TOTAL 9472072


The Net NPV after 4 years is -540833

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9472072 - 10012905 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Kalil Innovation to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Kalil Innovation has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Kalil Innovation can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Kalil Innovation, then the stock price of the Kalil Innovation should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Kalil Innovation should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Tom Kalil, Deputy Director for Technology & Innovation

References & Further Readings

Linda A. Hill, Allison J. Wigen (2018), "Tom Kalil, Deputy Director for Technology & Innovation Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Tira Austenite SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Misc. Fabricated Products


Noda SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. - Supplies & Fixtures


Soco SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas Operations


Biotron Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


DKK-Toa SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Leenos SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Personal & Household Prods.


Iseki & Co Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. & Agric. Machinery


Overseas Shipholding SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Transportation , Water Transportation


Evelo Biosciences SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Dayang Enterprise SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil Well Services & Equipment