×




Pret A Manger Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Pret A Manger case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Pret A Manger case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Frances X. Frei, RIck Goldberg, Stephanie van Sice. The Pret A Manger (referred as “Pret Shops” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Assessing performance, Branding, Business models, Career planning, Collaboration, Customer service, Developing employees, Diversity, Employee retention, Entrepreneurship, Financial management, Growth strategy, IT, Labor, Leadership, Leadership development, Manufacturing, Motivating people, Product development, Risk management, Social responsibility, Strategic planning, Strategy execution, Supply chain.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment




Case Description of Pret A Manger Case Study


Pret A Manger, a London-based chain of sandwich shops, was known for its fast, genuine service and pre-packaged sandwiches prepared on-site daily. Instructed by its board to grow at 15 percent per year, Pret considered opening "twin" shops in locations too small to contain kitchens; these shops would receive sandwich deliveries throughout the day from a nearby "parent" shop. Would Pret's employees and customers accept twin shops or view them as counter to the Pret culture? Through this decision point, the case frames a discussion about how companies build service models to reliably deliver customer service excellence. The case also helps students understand the role of employee management systems in creating consistent service experiences and introduces a set of innovative employee management practices.


Case Authors : Frances X. Frei, RIck Goldberg, Stephanie van Sice

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Assessing performance, Branding, Business models, Career planning, Collaboration, Customer service, Developing employees, Diversity, Employee retention, Entrepreneurship, Financial management, Growth strategy, IT, Labor, Leadership, Leadership development, Manufacturing, Motivating people, Product development, Risk management, Social responsibility, Strategic planning, Strategy execution, Supply chain




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Pret A Manger Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10009975) -10009975 - -
Year 1 3449704 -6560271 3449704 0.9434 3254438
Year 2 3956730 -2603541 7406434 0.89 3521476
Year 3 3951776 1348235 11358210 0.8396 3317987
Year 4 3236171 4584406 14594381 0.7921 2563351
TOTAL 14594381 12657251


The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2647276

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Payback Period
3. Profitability Index
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Pret Shops have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Pret Shops shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.




Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Pret A Manger

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Pret Shops often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Pret Shops needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10009975) -10009975 - -
Year 1 3449704 -6560271 3449704 0.8696 2999743
Year 2 3956730 -2603541 7406434 0.7561 2991856
Year 3 3951776 1348235 11358210 0.6575 2598357
Year 4 3236171 4584406 14594381 0.5718 1850291
TOTAL 10440247


The Net NPV after 4 years is 430272

(10440247 - 10009975 )






Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10009975) -10009975 - -
Year 1 3449704 -6560271 3449704 0.8333 2874753
Year 2 3956730 -2603541 7406434 0.6944 2747729
Year 3 3951776 1348235 11358210 0.5787 2286907
Year 4 3236171 4584406 14594381 0.4823 1560653
TOTAL 9470043


The Net NPV after 4 years is -539932

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9470043 - 10009975 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Pret Shops to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.



Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Pret Shops has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Pret Shops can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Pret Shops, then the stock price of the Pret Shops should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Pret Shops should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.




References & Further Readings

Frances X. Frei, RIck Goldberg, Stephanie van Sice (2018), "Pret A Manger Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.