×




Relational Investors and Home Depot (B) Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Relational Investors and Home Depot (B) case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Relational Investors and Home Depot (B) case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Jay W. Lorsch, Kaitlyn Simpson. The Relational Investors and Home Depot (B) (referred as “Relational Depot” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Corporate communications, Financial management.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Relational Investors and Home Depot (B) Case Study


You can order --casename-- analysis and solution here


Case Authors : Jay W. Lorsch, Kaitlyn Simpson

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Corporate communications, Financial management




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Relational Investors and Home Depot (B) Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10010069) -10010069 - -
Year 1 3453761 -6556308 3453761 0.9434 3258265
Year 2 3981470 -2574838 7435231 0.89 3543494
Year 3 3969256 1394418 11404487 0.8396 3332664
Year 4 3230072 4624490 14634559 0.7921 2558520
TOTAL 14634559 12692943




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2682874

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Net Present Value
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Relational Depot shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Relational Depot have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Relational Investors and Home Depot (B)

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Relational Depot often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Relational Depot needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10010069) -10010069 - -
Year 1 3453761 -6556308 3453761 0.8696 3003270
Year 2 3981470 -2574838 7435231 0.7561 3010563
Year 3 3969256 1394418 11404487 0.6575 2609850
Year 4 3230072 4624490 14634559 0.5718 1846804
TOTAL 10470488


The Net NPV after 4 years is 460419

(10470488 - 10010069 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10010069) -10010069 - -
Year 1 3453761 -6556308 3453761 0.8333 2878134
Year 2 3981470 -2574838 7435231 0.6944 2764910
Year 3 3969256 1394418 11404487 0.5787 2297023
Year 4 3230072 4624490 14634559 0.4823 1557712
TOTAL 9497779


The Net NPV after 4 years is -512290

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9497779 - 10010069 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Relational Depot to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Relational Depot has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Relational Depot can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Relational Depot, then the stock price of the Relational Depot should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Relational Depot should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Relational Investors and Home Depot (B)

References & Further Readings

Jay W. Lorsch, Kaitlyn Simpson (2018), "Relational Investors and Home Depot (B) Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Exacompta Clairefontaine SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Paper & Paper Products


Ophir SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas - Integrated


Matrix Concepts SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


HEG SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Atrium Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


Nojima SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Retail (Technology)


Huadian Power A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Utilities , Electric Utilities


Colopl Inc SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Services