Meeting Ontario's Goals in the Restructuring of General Motors of Canada Limited Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Meeting Ontario's Goals in the Restructuring of General Motors of Canada Limited case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Meeting Ontario's Goals in the Restructuring of General Motors of Canada Limited case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Paul Boothe, Connor Lyons, David Zhang. The Meeting Ontario's Goals in the Restructuring of General Motors of Canada Limited (referred as “Ontario's Canada” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Labor, Manufacturing, Negotiations, Public relations, Recession, Reorganization.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

---

Case Description of Meeting Ontario's Goals in the Restructuring of General Motors of Canada Limited Case Study

On December 20, 2008, Ontario's premier, Dalton McGuinty, and Canada's prime minister, Stephen Harper, announced their decision to provide $3 billion in interim loans to General Motors of Canada Limited. Due to the 2008 economic downturn and declining auto sales, the company had drawn from its cash reserves in an effort to maintain operations and, as a result, was facing insolvency. The automaker accounted for approximately 19,000 direct jobs in Ontario, and its collapse would mean a great economic loss for Canada. The provincial and federal governments needed to work together to support the company and, in doing so, also support Canada's economy during this financial downturn. Ontario's assistant deputy minister of Finance needed to determine the best way to proceed with the proposed financial plan, while also working with multiple governments and appeasing public opinion.

Case Authors : Paul Boothe, Connor Lyons, David Zhang

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Labor, Manufacturing, Negotiations, Public relations, Recession, Reorganization

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Meeting Ontario's Goals in the Restructuring of General Motors of Canada Limited Case Study

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 6 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10010625)	-10010625	-	-
Year 1	3472984	-6537641	3472984	0.9434	3276400
Year 2	3973937	-2563704	7446921	0.89	3536790
Year 3	3937482	1373778	11384403	0.8396	3305986
Year 4	3238615	4612393	14623018	0.7921	2565286
TOTAL			14623018		12684462

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2673837

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

---

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Net Present Value
3. Payback Period
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Ontario's Canada have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Ontario's Canada shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.

---

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Meeting Ontario's Goals in the Restructuring of General Motors of Canada Limited

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Ontario's Canada often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Ontario's Canada needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 15 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10010625)	-10010625	-	-
Year 1	3472984	-6537641	3472984	0.8696	3019986
Year 2	3973937	-2563704	7446921	0.7561	3004867
Year 3	3937482	1373778	11384403	0.6575	2588958
Year 4	3238615	4612393	14623018	0.5718	1851689
TOTAL					10465500

The Net NPV after 4 years is 454875

(10465500 - 10010625 )

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 20 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10010625)	-10010625	-	-
Year 1	3472984	-6537641	3472984	0.8333	2894153
Year 2	3973937	-2563704	7446921	0.6944	2759678
Year 3	3937482	1373778	11384403	0.5787	2278635
Year 4	3238615	4612393	14623018	0.4823	1561832
TOTAL					9494299

The Net NPV after 4 years is -516326

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9494299 - 10010625 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Ontario's Canada to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Ontario's Canada has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Ontario's Canada can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Ontario's Canada, then the stock price of the Ontario's Canada should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Ontario's Canada should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

---

Negotiation Strategy of Meeting Ontario's Goals in the Restructuring of General Motors of Canada Limited

References & Further Readings

Paul Boothe, Connor Lyons, David Zhang (2018), "Meeting Ontario's Goals in the Restructuring of General Motors of Canada Limited Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.