Jan Carlzon: CEO at SAS (A) Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Jan Carlzon: CEO at SAS (A) case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Jan Carlzon: CEO at SAS (A) case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Christopher A. Bartlett, Kenton W. Elderkin, Barbara Feinberg. The Jan Carlzon: CEO at SAS (A) (referred as “Carlzon's Carlzon” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Corporate governance, Crisis management, Human resource management, Knowledge management, Leadership, Motivating people, Recession, Strategy execution.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

---

Case Description of Jan Carlzon: CEO at SAS (A) Case Study

Describes Jan Carlzon's actions on assuming the CEO's responsibility at SAS in a time of financial and organizational difficulty. After tracing Carlzon's development as a manager, it focuses on the way in which he developed, then communicated a clear and motivating strategic mission to become "the world's best businessman's airline." After a spectacular turnaround, organizational problems re-emerge, and the case concludes with Carlzon wondering if his "second wave" can provide the same impetus that he gained on his first wave. Highlights the power of a clear and well-communicated strategic mission (strategic intent), but also explores problems and limits that can arise. Specifically, focuses on the common problem of motivating middle managers who often feel disenfranchised by front line empowerment.

Case Authors : Christopher A. Bartlett, Kenton W. Elderkin, Barbara Feinberg

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Corporate governance, Crisis management, Human resource management, Knowledge management, Leadership, Motivating people, Recession, Strategy execution

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Jan Carlzon: CEO at SAS (A) Case Study

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 6 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10007618)	-10007618	-	-
Year 1	3448493	-6559125	3448493	0.9434	3253295
Year 2	3971054	-2588071	7419547	0.89	3534224
Year 3	3952563	1364492	11372110	0.8396	3318648
Year 4	3246836	4611328	14618946	0.7921	2571798
TOTAL			14618946		12677966

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2670348

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

---

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Net Present Value
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Carlzon's Carlzon have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Carlzon's Carlzon shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.

---

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Jan Carlzon: CEO at SAS (A)

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Carlzon's Carlzon often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Carlzon's Carlzon needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 15 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10007618)	-10007618	-	-
Year 1	3448493	-6559125	3448493	0.8696	2998690
Year 2	3971054	-2588071	7419547	0.7561	3002687
Year 3	3952563	1364492	11372110	0.6575	2598874
Year 4	3246836	4611328	14618946	0.5718	1856389
TOTAL					10456640

The Net NPV after 4 years is 449022

(10456640 - 10007618 )

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 20 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10007618)	-10007618	-	-
Year 1	3448493	-6559125	3448493	0.8333	2873744
Year 2	3971054	-2588071	7419547	0.6944	2757676
Year 3	3952563	1364492	11372110	0.5787	2287363
Year 4	3246836	4611328	14618946	0.4823	1565797
TOTAL					9484580

The Net NPV after 4 years is -523038

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9484580 - 10007618 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Carlzon's Carlzon to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Carlzon's Carlzon has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Carlzon's Carlzon can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Carlzon's Carlzon, then the stock price of the Carlzon's Carlzon should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Carlzon's Carlzon should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

---

Negotiation Strategy of Jan Carlzon: CEO at SAS (A)

References & Further Readings

Christopher A. Bartlett, Kenton W. Elderkin, Barbara Feinberg (2018), "Jan Carlzon: CEO at SAS (A) Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.