×




General Dynamics: Compensation and Strategy (B), Chinese Version SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis

Case Study SWOT Analysis Solution

Case Study Description of General Dynamics: Compensation and Strategy (B), Chinese Version


Updates General Dynamics: Compensation and Strategy (A).

Authors :: Kevin J. Murphy, Jay Dial

Topics :: Organizational Development

Tags :: Competitive strategy, Motivating people, SWOT Analysis, SWOT Matrix, TOWS, Weighted SWOT Analysis

Swot Analysis of "General Dynamics: Compensation and Strategy (B), Chinese Version" written by Kevin J. Murphy, Jay Dial includes – strengths weakness that are internal strategic factors of the organization, and opportunities and threats that Dynamics Compensation facing as an external strategic factors. Some of the topics covered in General Dynamics: Compensation and Strategy (B), Chinese Version case study are - Strategic Management Strategies, Competitive strategy, Motivating people and Organizational Development.


Some of the macro environment factors that can be used to understand the General Dynamics: Compensation and Strategy (B), Chinese Version casestudy better are - – increasing government debt because of Covid-19 spendings, increasing inequality as vast percentage of new income is going to the top 1%, customer relationship management is fast transforming because of increasing concerns over data privacy, central banks are concerned over increasing inflation, challanges to central banks by blockchain based private currencies, increasing transportation and logistics costs, talent flight as more people leaving formal jobs, there is backlash against globalization, wage bills are increasing, etc



12 Hrs

$59.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

24 Hrs

$49.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

48 Hrs

$39.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now







Introduction to SWOT Analysis of General Dynamics: Compensation and Strategy (B), Chinese Version


SWOT stands for an organization’s Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats . At Oak Spring University , we believe that protagonist in General Dynamics: Compensation and Strategy (B), Chinese Version case study can use SWOT analysis as a strategic management tool to assess the current internal strengths and weaknesses of the Dynamics Compensation, and to figure out the opportunities and threats in the macro environment – technological, environmental, political, economic, social, demographic, etc in which Dynamics Compensation operates in.

According to Harvard Business Review, 75% of the managers use SWOT analysis for various purposes such as – evaluating current scenario, strategic planning, new venture feasibility, personal growth goals, new market entry, Go To market strategies, portfolio management and strategic trade-off assessment, organizational restructuring, etc.




SWOT Objectives / Importance of SWOT Analysis and SWOT Matrix


SWOT analysis of General Dynamics: Compensation and Strategy (B), Chinese Version can be done for the following purposes –
1. Strategic planning using facts provided in General Dynamics: Compensation and Strategy (B), Chinese Version case study
2. Improving business portfolio management of Dynamics Compensation
3. Assessing feasibility of the new initiative in Organizational Development field.
4. Making a Organizational Development topic specific business decision
5. Set goals for the organization
6. Organizational restructuring of Dynamics Compensation




Strengths General Dynamics: Compensation and Strategy (B), Chinese Version | Internal Strategic Factors
What are Strengths in SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis

The strengths of Dynamics Compensation in General Dynamics: Compensation and Strategy (B), Chinese Version Harvard Business Review case study are -

Learning organization

- Dynamics Compensation is a learning organization. It has inculcated three key characters of learning organization in its processes and operations – exploration, creativity, and expansiveness. The work place at Dynamics Compensation is open place that encourages instructiveness, ideation, open minded discussions, and creativity. Employees and leaders in General Dynamics: Compensation and Strategy (B), Chinese Version Harvard Business Review case study emphasize – knowledge, initiative, and innovation.

Ability to lead change in Organizational Development field

– Dynamics Compensation is one of the leading players in its industry. Over the years it has not only transformed the business landscape in its segment but also across the whole industry. The ability to lead change has enabled Dynamics Compensation in – penetrating new markets, reaching out to new customers, and providing different value propositions to different customers in the international markets.

Operational resilience

– The operational resilience strategy in the General Dynamics: Compensation and Strategy (B), Chinese Version Harvard Business Review case study comprises – understanding the underlying the factors in the industry, building diversified operations across different geographies so that disruption in one part of the world doesn’t impact the overall performance of the firm, and integrating the various business operations and processes through its digital transformation drive.

High switching costs

– The high switching costs that Dynamics Compensation has built up over years in its products and services combo offer has resulted in high retention of customers, lower marketing costs, and greater ability of the firm to focus on its customers.

Diverse revenue streams

– Dynamics Compensation is present in almost all the verticals within the industry. This has provided firm in General Dynamics: Compensation and Strategy (B), Chinese Version case study a diverse revenue stream that has helped it to survive disruptions such as global pandemic in Covid-19, financial disruption of 2008, and supply chain disruption of 2021.

Low bargaining power of suppliers

– Suppliers of Dynamics Compensation in the sector have low bargaining power. General Dynamics: Compensation and Strategy (B), Chinese Version has further diversified its suppliers portfolio by building a robust supply chain across various countries. This helps Dynamics Compensation to manage not only supply disruptions but also source products at highly competitive prices.

Strong track record of project management

– Dynamics Compensation is known for sticking to its project targets. This enables the firm to manage – time, project costs, and have sustainable margins on the projects.

Digital Transformation in Organizational Development segment

- digital transformation varies from industry to industry. For Dynamics Compensation digital transformation journey comprises differing goals based on market maturity, customer technology acceptance, and organizational culture. Dynamics Compensation has successfully integrated the four key components of digital transformation – digital integration in processes, digital integration in marketing and customer relationship management, digital integration into the value chain, and using technology to explore new products and market opportunities.

Successful track record of launching new products

– Dynamics Compensation has launched numerous new products in last few years, keeping in mind evolving customer preferences and competitive pressures. Dynamics Compensation has effective processes in place that helps in exploring new product needs, doing quick pilot testing, and then launching the products quickly using its extensive distribution network.

High brand equity

– Dynamics Compensation has strong brand awareness and brand recognition among both - the exiting customers and potential new customers. Strong brand equity has enabled Dynamics Compensation to keep acquiring new customers and building profitable relationship with both the new and loyal customers.

Cross disciplinary teams

– Horizontal connected teams at the Dynamics Compensation are driving operational speed, building greater agility, and keeping the organization nimble to compete with new competitors. It helps are organization to ideate new ideas, and execute them swiftly in the marketplace.

Highly skilled collaborators

– Dynamics Compensation has highly efficient outsourcing and offshoring strategy. It has resulted in greater operational flexibility and bringing down the costs in highly price sensitive segment. Secondly the value chain collaborators of the firm in General Dynamics: Compensation and Strategy (B), Chinese Version HBR case study have helped the firm to develop new products and bring them quickly to the marketplace.






Weaknesses General Dynamics: Compensation and Strategy (B), Chinese Version | Internal Strategic Factors
What are Weaknesses in SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis

The weaknesses of General Dynamics: Compensation and Strategy (B), Chinese Version are -

Slow to harness new channels of communication

– Even though competitors are using new communication channels such as Instagram, Tiktok, and Snap, Dynamics Compensation is slow explore the new channels of communication. These new channels of communication mentioned in marketing section of case study General Dynamics: Compensation and Strategy (B), Chinese Version can help to provide better information regarding products and services. It can also build an online community to further reach out to potential customers.

No frontier risks strategy

– After analyzing the HBR case study General Dynamics: Compensation and Strategy (B), Chinese Version, it seems that company is thinking about the frontier risks that can impact Organizational Development strategy. But it has very little resources allocation to manage the risks emerging from events such as natural disasters, climate change, melting of permafrost, tacking the rise of artificial intelligence, opportunities and threats emerging from commercialization of space etc.

Lack of clear differentiation of Dynamics Compensation products

– To increase the profitability and margins on the products, Dynamics Compensation needs to provide more differentiated products than what it is currently offering in the marketplace.

Slow decision making process

– As mentioned earlier in the report, Dynamics Compensation has a very deliberative decision making approach. This approach has resulted in prudent decisions, but it has also resulted in missing opportunities in the industry over the last five years. Dynamics Compensation even though has strong showing on digital transformation primary two stages, it has struggled to capitalize the power of digital transformation in marketing efforts and new venture efforts.

High cash cycle compare to competitors

Dynamics Compensation has a high cash cycle compare to other players in the industry. It needs to shorten the cash cycle by 12% to be more competitive in the marketplace, reduce inventory costs, and be more profitable.

High bargaining power of channel partners

– Because of the regulatory requirements, Kevin J. Murphy, Jay Dial suggests that, Dynamics Compensation is facing high bargaining power of the channel partners. So far it has not able to streamline the operations to reduce the bargaining power of the value chain partners in the industry.

Increasing silos among functional specialists

– The organizational structure of Dynamics Compensation is dominated by functional specialists. It is not different from other players in the Organizational Development segment. Dynamics Compensation needs to de-silo the office environment to harness the true potential of its workforce. Secondly the de-silo will also help Dynamics Compensation to focus more on services rather than just following the product oriented approach.

Need for greater diversity

– Dynamics Compensation has taken concrete steps on diversity, equity, and inclusion. But the efforts so far has resulted in limited success. It needs to expand the recruitment and selection process to hire more people from the minorities and underprivileged background.

Compensation and incentives

– The revenue per employee as mentioned in the HBR case study General Dynamics: Compensation and Strategy (B), Chinese Version, is just above the industry average. Dynamics Compensation needs to redesign the compensation structure and incentives to increase the revenue per employees. Some of the steps that it can take are – hiring more specialists on project basis, etc.

Capital Spending Reduction

– Even during the low interest decade, Dynamics Compensation has not been able to do capital spending to the tune of the competition. This has resulted into fewer innovations and company facing stiff competition from both existing competitors and new entrants who are disrupting the industry using digital technology.

Interest costs

– Compare to the competition, Dynamics Compensation has borrowed money from the capital market at higher rates. It needs to restructure the interest payment and costs so that it can compete better and improve profitability.




Opportunities General Dynamics: Compensation and Strategy (B), Chinese Version | External Strategic Factors
What are Opportunities in the SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis


The opportunities highlighted in the Harvard Business Review case study General Dynamics: Compensation and Strategy (B), Chinese Version are -

Use of Bitcoin and other crypto currencies for transactions

– The popularity of Bitcoin and other crypto currencies as asset class and medium of transaction has opened new opportunities for Dynamics Compensation in the consumer business. Now Dynamics Compensation can target international markets with far fewer capital restrictions requirements than the existing system.

Lowering marketing communication costs

– 5G expansion will open new opportunities for Dynamics Compensation in the field of marketing communication. It will bring down the cost of doing business, provide technology platform to build new products in the Organizational Development segment, and it will provide faster access to the consumers.

Using analytics as competitive advantage

– Dynamics Compensation has spent a significant amount of money and effort to integrate analytics and machine learning into its operations in the sector. This continuous investment in analytics has enabled, as illustrated in the Harvard case study General Dynamics: Compensation and Strategy (B), Chinese Version - to build a competitive advantage using analytics. The analytics driven competitive advantage can help Dynamics Compensation to build faster Go To Market strategies, better consumer insights, developing relevant product features, and building a highly efficient supply chain.

Loyalty marketing

– Dynamics Compensation has focused on building a highly responsive customer relationship management platform. This platform is built on in-house data and driven by analytics and artificial intelligence. The customer analytics can help the organization to fine tune its loyalty marketing efforts, increase the wallet share of the organization, reduce wastage on mainstream advertising spending, build better pricing strategies using personalization, etc.

Finding new ways to collaborate

– Covid-19 has not only transformed business models of companies in Organizational Development industry, but it has also influenced the consumer preferences. Dynamics Compensation can tie-up with other value chain partners to explore new opportunities regarding meeting customer demands and building a rewarding and engaging relationship.

Identify volunteer opportunities

– Covid-19 has impacted working population in two ways – it has led to people soul searching about their professional choices, resulting in mass resignation. Secondly it has encouraged people to do things that they are passionate about. This has opened opportunities for businesses to build volunteer oriented socially driven projects. Dynamics Compensation can explore opportunities that can attract volunteers and are consistent with its mission and vision.

Learning at scale

– Online learning technologies has now opened space for Dynamics Compensation to conduct training and development for its employees across the world. This will result in not only reducing the cost of training but also help employees in different part of the world to integrate with the headquarter work culture, ethos, and standards.

Redefining models of collaboration and team work

– As explained in the weaknesses section, Dynamics Compensation is facing challenges because of the dominance of functional experts in the organization. General Dynamics: Compensation and Strategy (B), Chinese Version case study suggests that firm can utilize new technology to build more coordinated teams and streamline operations and communications using tools such as CAD, Zoom, etc.

Leveraging digital technologies

– Dynamics Compensation can leverage digital technologies such as artificial intelligence and machine learning to automate the production process, customer analytics to get better insights into consumer behavior, realtime digital dashboards to get better sales tracking, logistics and transportation, product tracking, etc.

Better consumer reach

– The expansion of the 5G network will help Dynamics Compensation to increase its market reach. Dynamics Compensation will be able to reach out to new customers. Secondly 5G will also provide technology framework to build new tools and products that can help more immersive consumer experience and faster consumer journey.

Remote work and new talent hiring opportunities

– The widespread usage of remote working technologies during Covid-19 has opened opportunities for Dynamics Compensation to expand its talent hiring zone. According to McKinsey Global Institute, 20% of the high end workforce in fields such as finance, information technology, can continously work from remote local post Covid-19. This presents a really great opportunity for Dynamics Compensation to hire the very best people irrespective of their geographical location.

Reforming the budgeting process

- By establishing new metrics that will be used to evaluate both existing and potential projects Dynamics Compensation can not only reduce the costs of the project but also help it in integrating the projects with other processes within the organization.

Harnessing reconfiguration of the global supply chains

– As the trade war between US and China heats up in the coming years, Dynamics Compensation can build a diversified supply chain model across various countries in - South East Asia, India, and other parts of the world. This reconfiguration of global supply chain can help, as suggested in case study, General Dynamics: Compensation and Strategy (B), Chinese Version, to buy more products closer to the markets, and it can leverage its size and influence to get better deal from the local markets.




Threats General Dynamics: Compensation and Strategy (B), Chinese Version External Strategic Factors
What are Threats in the SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis


The threats mentioned in the HBR case study General Dynamics: Compensation and Strategy (B), Chinese Version are -

Environmental challenges

– Dynamics Compensation needs to have a robust strategy against the disruptions arising from climate change and energy requirements. EU has identified it as key priority area and spending 30% of its 880 billion Euros European post Covid-19 recovery funds on green technology. Dynamics Compensation can take advantage of this fund but it will also bring new competitors in the Organizational Development industry.

Capital market disruption

– During the Covid-19, Dow Jones has touched record high. The valuations of a number of companies are way beyond their existing business model potential. This can lead to capital market correction which can put a number of suppliers, collaborators, value chain partners in great financial difficulty. It will directly impact the business of Dynamics Compensation.

Technology acceleration in Forth Industrial Revolution

– Dynamics Compensation has witnessed rapid integration of technology during Covid-19 in the Organizational Development industry. As one of the leading players in the industry, Dynamics Compensation needs to keep up with the evolution of technology in the Organizational Development sector. According to Mckinsey study top managers believe that the adoption of technology in operations, communications is 20-25 times faster than what they planned in the beginning of 2019.

Instability in the European markets

– European Union markets are facing three big challenges post Covid – expanded balance sheets, Brexit related business disruption, and aggressive Russia looking to distract the existing security mechanism. Dynamics Compensation will face different problems in different parts of Europe. For example it will face inflationary pressures in UK, France, and Germany, balance sheet expansion and demand challenges in Southern European countries, and geopolitical instability in the Eastern Europe.

Consumer confidence and its impact on Dynamics Compensation demand

– There is a high probability of declining consumer confidence, given – high inflammation rate, rise of gig economy, lower job stability, increasing cost of living, higher interest rates, and aging demography. All the factors contribute to people saving higher rate of their income, resulting in lower consumer demand in the industry and other sectors.

New competition

– After the dotcom bust of 2001, financial crisis of 2008-09, the business formation in US economy had declined. But in 2020 alone, there are more than 1.5 million new business applications in United States. This can lead to greater competition for Dynamics Compensation in the Organizational Development sector and impact the bottomline of the organization.

Shortening product life cycle

– it is one of the major threat that Dynamics Compensation is facing in Organizational Development sector. It can lead to higher research and development costs, higher marketing expenses, lower customer loyalty, etc.

Regulatory challenges

– Dynamics Compensation needs to prepare for regulatory challenges as consumer protection groups and other pressure groups are vigorously advocating for more regulations on big business - to reduce inequality, to create a level playing field, to product data privacy and consumer privacy, to reduce the influence of big money on democratic institutions, etc. This can lead to significant changes in the Organizational Development industry regulations.

Barriers of entry lowering

– As technology is more democratized, the barriers to entry in the industry are lowering. It can presents Dynamics Compensation with greater competitive threats in the near to medium future. Secondly it will also put downward pressure on pricing throughout the sector.

Learning curve for new practices

– As the technology based on artificial intelligence and machine learning platform is getting complex, as highlighted in case study General Dynamics: Compensation and Strategy (B), Chinese Version, Dynamics Compensation may face longer learning curve for training and development of existing employees. This can open space for more nimble competitors in the field of Organizational Development .

High level of anxiety and lack of motivation

– the Great Resignation in United States is the sign of broader dissatisfaction among the workforce in United States. Dynamics Compensation needs to understand the core reasons impacting the Organizational Development industry. This will help it in building a better workplace.

Backlash against dominant players

– US Congress and other legislative arms of the government are getting tough on big business especially technology companies. The digital arm of Dynamics Compensation business can come under increasing regulations regarding data privacy, data security, etc.

Trade war between China and United States

– The trade war between two of the biggest economies can hugely impact the opportunities for Dynamics Compensation in the Organizational Development industry. The Organizational Development industry is already at various protected from local competition in China, with the rise of trade war the protection levels may go up. This presents a clear threat of current business model in Chinese market.




Weighted SWOT Analysis of General Dynamics: Compensation and Strategy (B), Chinese Version Template, Example


Not all factors mentioned under the Strengths, Weakness, Opportunities, and Threats quadrants in the SWOT Analysis are equal. Managers in the HBR case study General Dynamics: Compensation and Strategy (B), Chinese Version needs to zero down on the relative importance of each factor mentioned in the Strengths, Weakness, Opportunities, and Threats quadrants. We can provide the relative importance to each factor by assigning relative weights. Weighted SWOT analysis process is a three stage process –

First stage for doing weighted SWOT analysis of the case study General Dynamics: Compensation and Strategy (B), Chinese Version is to rank the strengths and weaknesses of the organization. This will help you to assess the most important strengths and weaknesses of the firm and which one of the strengths and weaknesses mentioned in the initial lists are marginal and can be left out.

Second stage for conducting weighted SWOT analysis of the Harvard case study General Dynamics: Compensation and Strategy (B), Chinese Version is to give probabilities to the external strategic factors thus better understanding the opportunities and threats arising out of macro environment changes and developments.

Third stage of constructing weighted SWOT analysis of General Dynamics: Compensation and Strategy (B), Chinese Version is to provide strategic recommendations includes – joining likelihood of external strategic factors such as opportunities and threats to the internal strategic factors – strengths and weaknesses. You should start with external factors as they will provide the direction of the overall industry. Secondly by joining probabilities with internal strategic factors can help the company not only strategic fit but also the most probably strategic trade-off that Dynamics Compensation needs to make to build a sustainable competitive advantage.



--- ---

Eric Weston SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Michael J. Roberts, James M. Sharpe , Innovation & Entrepreneurship


Resuming Internationalization at Starbucks SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Rob Alkema, Mario Koster, Christopher Williams , Global Business


The Talent Dividend SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Sam Ransbotham, David Kiron, Pamela Kirk Prentice , Leadership & Managing People


The South Sea Company (A) SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

David A. Moss, Eugene Kintgen, Agnieszka Rafalska , Leadership & Managing People


National Youth Association SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Robert N. Anthony , Finance & Accounting


Royal Bank of Canada in Thailand SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Paul W. Beamish, Bernice Scholten, Leslie Stephenson , Technology & Operations


Note on New Drug Development in the United States SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Stefan Thomke, Ashok Nimgade , Technology & Operations


Triangulate SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Thomas R. Eisenmann, Lauren Barley , Innovation & Entrepreneurship