×




Google Inc. in 2014 (Abridged) SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis

Case Study SWOT Analysis Solution

Case Study Description of Google Inc. in 2014 (Abridged)


Describes Google's history, business model, governance structure, corporate culture, and processes for managing innovation. Reviews Google's recent strategic initiatives and the threats they pose to Yahoo, Microsoft, and others. Asks what Google should do next.

Authors :: Benjamin Edelman, Thomas R. Eisenmann

Topics :: Strategy & Execution

Tags :: Competition, Economics, Internet, IT, Marketing, SWOT Analysis, SWOT Matrix, TOWS, Weighted SWOT Analysis

Swot Analysis of "Google Inc. in 2014 (Abridged)" written by Benjamin Edelman, Thomas R. Eisenmann includes – strengths weakness that are internal strategic factors of the organization, and opportunities and threats that Google's Google facing as an external strategic factors. Some of the topics covered in Google Inc. in 2014 (Abridged) case study are - Strategic Management Strategies, Competition, Economics, Internet, IT, Marketing and Strategy & Execution.


Some of the macro environment factors that can be used to understand the Google Inc. in 2014 (Abridged) casestudy better are - – there is backlash against globalization, banking and financial system is disrupted by Bitcoin and other crypto currencies, central banks are concerned over increasing inflation, customer relationship management is fast transforming because of increasing concerns over data privacy, geopolitical disruptions, challanges to central banks by blockchain based private currencies, increasing commodity prices, talent flight as more people leaving formal jobs, increasing energy prices, etc



12 Hrs

$59.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

24 Hrs

$49.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

48 Hrs

$39.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now







Introduction to SWOT Analysis of Google Inc. in 2014 (Abridged)


SWOT stands for an organization’s Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats . At Oak Spring University , we believe that protagonist in Google Inc. in 2014 (Abridged) case study can use SWOT analysis as a strategic management tool to assess the current internal strengths and weaknesses of the Google's Google, and to figure out the opportunities and threats in the macro environment – technological, environmental, political, economic, social, demographic, etc in which Google's Google operates in.

According to Harvard Business Review, 75% of the managers use SWOT analysis for various purposes such as – evaluating current scenario, strategic planning, new venture feasibility, personal growth goals, new market entry, Go To market strategies, portfolio management and strategic trade-off assessment, organizational restructuring, etc.




SWOT Objectives / Importance of SWOT Analysis and SWOT Matrix


SWOT analysis of Google Inc. in 2014 (Abridged) can be done for the following purposes –
1. Strategic planning using facts provided in Google Inc. in 2014 (Abridged) case study
2. Improving business portfolio management of Google's Google
3. Assessing feasibility of the new initiative in Strategy & Execution field.
4. Making a Strategy & Execution topic specific business decision
5. Set goals for the organization
6. Organizational restructuring of Google's Google




Strengths Google Inc. in 2014 (Abridged) | Internal Strategic Factors
What are Strengths in SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis

The strengths of Google's Google in Google Inc. in 2014 (Abridged) Harvard Business Review case study are -

Training and development

– Google's Google has one of the best training and development program in the industry. The effectiveness of the training programs can be measured in Google Inc. in 2014 (Abridged) Harvard Business Review case study by analyzing – employees retention, in-house promotion, loyalty, new venture initiation, lack of conflict, and high level of both employees and customer engagement.

High brand equity

– Google's Google has strong brand awareness and brand recognition among both - the exiting customers and potential new customers. Strong brand equity has enabled Google's Google to keep acquiring new customers and building profitable relationship with both the new and loyal customers.

Strong track record of project management

– Google's Google is known for sticking to its project targets. This enables the firm to manage – time, project costs, and have sustainable margins on the projects.

Superior customer experience

– The customer experience strategy of Google's Google in the segment is based on four key concepts – personalization, simplification of complex needs, prompt response, and continuous engagement.

Ability to recruit top talent

– Google's Google is one of the leading recruiters in the industry. Managers in the Google Inc. in 2014 (Abridged) are in a position to attract the best talent available. The firm has a robust talent identification program that helps in identifying the brightest.

Ability to lead change in Strategy & Execution field

– Google's Google is one of the leading players in its industry. Over the years it has not only transformed the business landscape in its segment but also across the whole industry. The ability to lead change has enabled Google's Google in – penetrating new markets, reaching out to new customers, and providing different value propositions to different customers in the international markets.

Organizational Resilience of Google's Google

– The covid-19 pandemic has put organizational resilience at the centre of everthing that Google's Google does. Organizational resilience comprises - Financial Resilience, Operational Resilience, Technological Resilience, Organizational Resilience, Business Model Resilience, and Reputation Resilience.

Innovation driven organization

– Google's Google is one of the most innovative firm in sector. Manager in Google Inc. in 2014 (Abridged) Harvard Business Review case study can use Clayton Christensen Disruptive Innovation strategies to further increase the scale of innovtions in the organization.

Operational resilience

– The operational resilience strategy in the Google Inc. in 2014 (Abridged) Harvard Business Review case study comprises – understanding the underlying the factors in the industry, building diversified operations across different geographies so that disruption in one part of the world doesn’t impact the overall performance of the firm, and integrating the various business operations and processes through its digital transformation drive.

Successful track record of launching new products

– Google's Google has launched numerous new products in last few years, keeping in mind evolving customer preferences and competitive pressures. Google's Google has effective processes in place that helps in exploring new product needs, doing quick pilot testing, and then launching the products quickly using its extensive distribution network.

Cross disciplinary teams

– Horizontal connected teams at the Google's Google are driving operational speed, building greater agility, and keeping the organization nimble to compete with new competitors. It helps are organization to ideate new ideas, and execute them swiftly in the marketplace.

Sustainable margins compare to other players in Strategy & Execution industry

– Google Inc. in 2014 (Abridged) firm has clearly differentiated products in the market place. This has enabled Google's Google to fetch slight price premium compare to the competitors in the Strategy & Execution industry. The sustainable margins have also helped Google's Google to invest into research and development (R&D) and innovation.






Weaknesses Google Inc. in 2014 (Abridged) | Internal Strategic Factors
What are Weaknesses in SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis

The weaknesses of Google Inc. in 2014 (Abridged) are -

Need for greater diversity

– Google's Google has taken concrete steps on diversity, equity, and inclusion. But the efforts so far has resulted in limited success. It needs to expand the recruitment and selection process to hire more people from the minorities and underprivileged background.

Lack of clear differentiation of Google's Google products

– To increase the profitability and margins on the products, Google's Google needs to provide more differentiated products than what it is currently offering in the marketplace.

Interest costs

– Compare to the competition, Google's Google has borrowed money from the capital market at higher rates. It needs to restructure the interest payment and costs so that it can compete better and improve profitability.

Compensation and incentives

– The revenue per employee as mentioned in the HBR case study Google Inc. in 2014 (Abridged), is just above the industry average. Google's Google needs to redesign the compensation structure and incentives to increase the revenue per employees. Some of the steps that it can take are – hiring more specialists on project basis, etc.

High cash cycle compare to competitors

Google's Google has a high cash cycle compare to other players in the industry. It needs to shorten the cash cycle by 12% to be more competitive in the marketplace, reduce inventory costs, and be more profitable.

Increasing silos among functional specialists

– The organizational structure of Google's Google is dominated by functional specialists. It is not different from other players in the Strategy & Execution segment. Google's Google needs to de-silo the office environment to harness the true potential of its workforce. Secondly the de-silo will also help Google's Google to focus more on services rather than just following the product oriented approach.

High bargaining power of channel partners

– Because of the regulatory requirements, Benjamin Edelman, Thomas R. Eisenmann suggests that, Google's Google is facing high bargaining power of the channel partners. So far it has not able to streamline the operations to reduce the bargaining power of the value chain partners in the industry.

Low market penetration in new markets

– Outside its home market of Google's Google, firm in the HBR case study Google Inc. in 2014 (Abridged) needs to spend more promotional, marketing, and advertising efforts to penetrate international markets.

Slow to strategic competitive environment developments

– As Google Inc. in 2014 (Abridged) HBR case study mentions - Google's Google takes time to assess the upcoming competitions. This has led to missing out on atleast 2-3 big opportunities in the industry in last five years.

Ability to respond to the competition

– As the decision making is very deliberative, highlighted in the case study Google Inc. in 2014 (Abridged), in the dynamic environment Google's Google has struggled to respond to the nimble upstart competition. Google's Google has reasonably good record with similar level competitors but it has struggled with new entrants taking away niches of its business.

Workers concerns about automation

– As automation is fast increasing in the segment, Google's Google needs to come up with a strategy to reduce the workers concern regarding automation. Without a clear strategy, it could lead to disruption and uncertainty within the organization.




Opportunities Google Inc. in 2014 (Abridged) | External Strategic Factors
What are Opportunities in the SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis


The opportunities highlighted in the Harvard Business Review case study Google Inc. in 2014 (Abridged) are -

Better consumer reach

– The expansion of the 5G network will help Google's Google to increase its market reach. Google's Google will be able to reach out to new customers. Secondly 5G will also provide technology framework to build new tools and products that can help more immersive consumer experience and faster consumer journey.

Building a culture of innovation

– managers at Google's Google can make experimentation a productive activity and build a culture of innovation using approaches such as – mining transaction data, A/B testing of websites and selling platforms, engaging potential customers over various needs, and building on small ideas in the Strategy & Execution segment.

Developing new processes and practices

– Google's Google can develop new processes and procedures in Strategy & Execution industry using technology such as automation using artificial intelligence, real time transportation and products tracking, 3D modeling for concept development and new products pilot testing etc.

Increase in government spending

– As the United States and other governments are increasing social spending and infrastructure spending to build economies post Covid-19, Google's Google can use these opportunities to build new business models that can help the communities that Google's Google operates in. Secondly it can use opportunities from government spending in Strategy & Execution sector.

Learning at scale

– Online learning technologies has now opened space for Google's Google to conduct training and development for its employees across the world. This will result in not only reducing the cost of training but also help employees in different part of the world to integrate with the headquarter work culture, ethos, and standards.

Leveraging digital technologies

– Google's Google can leverage digital technologies such as artificial intelligence and machine learning to automate the production process, customer analytics to get better insights into consumer behavior, realtime digital dashboards to get better sales tracking, logistics and transportation, product tracking, etc.

Loyalty marketing

– Google's Google has focused on building a highly responsive customer relationship management platform. This platform is built on in-house data and driven by analytics and artificial intelligence. The customer analytics can help the organization to fine tune its loyalty marketing efforts, increase the wallet share of the organization, reduce wastage on mainstream advertising spending, build better pricing strategies using personalization, etc.

Reforming the budgeting process

- By establishing new metrics that will be used to evaluate both existing and potential projects Google's Google can not only reduce the costs of the project but also help it in integrating the projects with other processes within the organization.

Redefining models of collaboration and team work

– As explained in the weaknesses section, Google's Google is facing challenges because of the dominance of functional experts in the organization. Google Inc. in 2014 (Abridged) case study suggests that firm can utilize new technology to build more coordinated teams and streamline operations and communications using tools such as CAD, Zoom, etc.

Buying journey improvements

– Google's Google can improve the customer journey of consumers in the industry by using analytics and artificial intelligence. Google Inc. in 2014 (Abridged) suggest that firm can provide automated chats to help consumers solve their own problems, provide online suggestions to get maximum out of the products and services, and help consumers to build a community where they can interact with each other to develop new features and uses.

Creating value in data economy

– The success of analytics program of Google's Google has opened avenues for new revenue streams for the organization in the industry. This can help Google's Google to build a more holistic ecosystem as suggested in the Google Inc. in 2014 (Abridged) case study. Google's Google can build new products and services such as - data insight services, data privacy related products, data based consulting services, etc.

Use of Bitcoin and other crypto currencies for transactions

– The popularity of Bitcoin and other crypto currencies as asset class and medium of transaction has opened new opportunities for Google's Google in the consumer business. Now Google's Google can target international markets with far fewer capital restrictions requirements than the existing system.

Manufacturing automation

– Google's Google can use the latest technology developments to improve its manufacturing and designing process in Strategy & Execution segment. It can use CAD and 3D printing to build a quick prototype and pilot testing products. It can leverage automation using machine learning and artificial intelligence to do faster production at lowers costs, and it can leverage the growth in satellite and tracking technologies to improve inventory management, transportation, and shipping.




Threats Google Inc. in 2014 (Abridged) External Strategic Factors
What are Threats in the SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis


The threats mentioned in the HBR case study Google Inc. in 2014 (Abridged) are -

Instability in the European markets

– European Union markets are facing three big challenges post Covid – expanded balance sheets, Brexit related business disruption, and aggressive Russia looking to distract the existing security mechanism. Google's Google will face different problems in different parts of Europe. For example it will face inflationary pressures in UK, France, and Germany, balance sheet expansion and demand challenges in Southern European countries, and geopolitical instability in the Eastern Europe.

Aging population

– As the populations of most advanced economies are aging, it will lead to high social security costs, higher savings among population, and lower demand for goods and services in the economy. The household savings in US, France, UK, Germany, and Japan are growing faster than predicted because of uncertainty caused by pandemic.

Easy access to finance

– Easy access to finance in Strategy & Execution field will also reduce the barriers to entry in the industry, thus putting downward pressure on the prices because of increasing competition. Google's Google can utilize it by borrowing at lower rates and invest it into research and development, capital expenditure to fortify its core competitive advantage.

Increasing international competition and downward pressure on margins

– Apart from technology driven competitive advantage dilution, Google's Google can face downward pressure on margins from increasing competition from international players. The international players have stable revenue in their home market and can use those resources to penetrate prominent markets illustrated in HBR case study Google Inc. in 2014 (Abridged) .

Technology disruption because of hacks, piracy etc

– The colonial pipeline illustrated, how vulnerable modern organization are to international hackers, miscreants, and disruptors. The cyber security interruption, data leaks, etc can seriously jeopardize the future growth of the organization.

Learning curve for new practices

– As the technology based on artificial intelligence and machine learning platform is getting complex, as highlighted in case study Google Inc. in 2014 (Abridged), Google's Google may face longer learning curve for training and development of existing employees. This can open space for more nimble competitors in the field of Strategy & Execution .

Increasing wage structure of Google's Google

– Post Covid-19 there is a sharp increase in the wages especially in the jobs that require interaction with people. The increasing wages can put downward pressure on the margins of Google's Google.

Capital market disruption

– During the Covid-19, Dow Jones has touched record high. The valuations of a number of companies are way beyond their existing business model potential. This can lead to capital market correction which can put a number of suppliers, collaborators, value chain partners in great financial difficulty. It will directly impact the business of Google's Google.

Barriers of entry lowering

– As technology is more democratized, the barriers to entry in the industry are lowering. It can presents Google's Google with greater competitive threats in the near to medium future. Secondly it will also put downward pressure on pricing throughout the sector.

Shortening product life cycle

– it is one of the major threat that Google's Google is facing in Strategy & Execution sector. It can lead to higher research and development costs, higher marketing expenses, lower customer loyalty, etc.

New competition

– After the dotcom bust of 2001, financial crisis of 2008-09, the business formation in US economy had declined. But in 2020 alone, there are more than 1.5 million new business applications in United States. This can lead to greater competition for Google's Google in the Strategy & Execution sector and impact the bottomline of the organization.

Stagnating economy with rate increase

– Google's Google can face lack of demand in the market place because of Fed actions to reduce inflation. This can lead to sluggish growth in the economy, lower demands, lower investments, higher borrowing costs, and consolidation in the field.

Environmental challenges

– Google's Google needs to have a robust strategy against the disruptions arising from climate change and energy requirements. EU has identified it as key priority area and spending 30% of its 880 billion Euros European post Covid-19 recovery funds on green technology. Google's Google can take advantage of this fund but it will also bring new competitors in the Strategy & Execution industry.




Weighted SWOT Analysis of Google Inc. in 2014 (Abridged) Template, Example


Not all factors mentioned under the Strengths, Weakness, Opportunities, and Threats quadrants in the SWOT Analysis are equal. Managers in the HBR case study Google Inc. in 2014 (Abridged) needs to zero down on the relative importance of each factor mentioned in the Strengths, Weakness, Opportunities, and Threats quadrants. We can provide the relative importance to each factor by assigning relative weights. Weighted SWOT analysis process is a three stage process –

First stage for doing weighted SWOT analysis of the case study Google Inc. in 2014 (Abridged) is to rank the strengths and weaknesses of the organization. This will help you to assess the most important strengths and weaknesses of the firm and which one of the strengths and weaknesses mentioned in the initial lists are marginal and can be left out.

Second stage for conducting weighted SWOT analysis of the Harvard case study Google Inc. in 2014 (Abridged) is to give probabilities to the external strategic factors thus better understanding the opportunities and threats arising out of macro environment changes and developments.

Third stage of constructing weighted SWOT analysis of Google Inc. in 2014 (Abridged) is to provide strategic recommendations includes – joining likelihood of external strategic factors such as opportunities and threats to the internal strategic factors – strengths and weaknesses. You should start with external factors as they will provide the direction of the overall industry. Secondly by joining probabilities with internal strategic factors can help the company not only strategic fit but also the most probably strategic trade-off that Google's Google needs to make to build a sustainable competitive advantage.



--- ---

NTL Lemnis: Exploring the B2C Market SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Geeta Mishra, Sandeep Puri , Sales & Marketing


healthymagination at GE (in 2011) SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Marne L. Arthaud-Day, Alicia Horbaczewski, Frank T. Rothaermel , Strategy & Execution


Magic Bus: From Childhood to Livelihood SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

V. Kasturi Rangan, Vikram Gandhi, Anjali Raina, Rachna Chawla , Innovation & Entrepreneurship


IT-Led Business Transformation at Reliance Energy SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Deepa Mani, Geetika Shah, Revati Nehru , Strategy & Execution


Skype in the Voice-over-IP Industry: A Commercially Viable Blue Ocean? SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

W. Chan Kim, Katrina Ling, Jee Eun Lee, Renee A. Mauborgne , Strategy & Execution


Henry J. Kaiser and the Art of the Possible SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Anthony J. Mayo, Mark Benson, David Chen , Innovation & Entrepreneurship


Three Jays Corporation, Spanish Version SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Paul W. Marshall, Mark Davis , Technology & Operations