Extraterritorial Applications of Antitrust Law: U.S. and Japanese Approaches SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis
Global Business
Strategy / MBA Resources
Case Study SWOT Analysis Solution
Case Study Description of Extraterritorial Applications of Antitrust Law: U.S. and Japanese Approaches
This case describes the differebt approaches the United States and Japan have taken to extend the jurisdiction of their antitrust laws to foreign companies. The section on the United States, in particular, focuses on the evolving logic of the Supreme Court in dealing with these issues. It presents the case of United States vs. Nippon Paper Industries Co. Ltd. and demonstrates the difficulties of applying somewhat abstract principles of jurisdiction to a real-life situation.
Swot Analysis of "Extraterritorial Applications of Antitrust Law: U.S. and Japanese Approaches" written by Guhan Subramanian, Michelle Kalka includes – strengths weakness that are internal strategic factors of the organization, and opportunities and threats that Jurisdiction Antitrust facing as an external strategic factors. Some of the topics covered in Extraterritorial Applications of Antitrust Law: U.S. and Japanese Approaches case study are - Strategic Management Strategies, Competition, Pricing, Regulation and Global Business.
Some of the macro environment factors that can be used to understand the Extraterritorial Applications of Antitrust Law: U.S. and Japanese Approaches casestudy better are - – increasing commodity prices, increasing household debt because of falling income levels, digital marketing is dominated by two big players Facebook and Google, cloud computing is disrupting traditional business models, customer relationship management is fast transforming because of increasing concerns over data privacy, talent flight as more people leaving formal jobs, geopolitical disruptions,
supply chains are disrupted by pandemic , technology disruption, etc
Introduction to SWOT Analysis of Extraterritorial Applications of Antitrust Law: U.S. and Japanese Approaches
SWOT stands for an organization’s Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats . At Oak Spring University , we believe that protagonist in Extraterritorial Applications of Antitrust Law: U.S. and Japanese Approaches case study can use SWOT analysis as a strategic management tool to assess the current internal strengths and weaknesses of the Jurisdiction Antitrust, and to figure out the opportunities and threats in the macro environment – technological, environmental, political, economic, social, demographic, etc in which Jurisdiction Antitrust operates in.
According to Harvard Business Review, 75% of the managers use SWOT analysis for various purposes such as – evaluating current scenario, strategic planning, new venture feasibility, personal growth goals, new market entry, Go To market strategies, portfolio management and strategic trade-off assessment, organizational restructuring, etc.
SWOT Objectives / Importance of SWOT Analysis and SWOT Matrix
SWOT analysis of Extraterritorial Applications of Antitrust Law: U.S. and Japanese Approaches can be done for the following purposes –
1. Strategic planning using facts provided in Extraterritorial Applications of Antitrust Law: U.S. and Japanese Approaches case study
2. Improving business portfolio management of Jurisdiction Antitrust
3. Assessing feasibility of the new initiative in Global Business field.
4. Making a Global Business topic specific business decision
5. Set goals for the organization
6. Organizational restructuring of Jurisdiction Antitrust
Strengths Extraterritorial Applications of Antitrust Law: U.S. and Japanese Approaches | Internal Strategic Factors
What are Strengths in SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis
The strengths of Jurisdiction Antitrust in Extraterritorial Applications of Antitrust Law: U.S. and Japanese Approaches Harvard Business Review case study are -
Innovation driven organization
– Jurisdiction Antitrust is one of the most innovative firm in sector. Manager in Extraterritorial Applications of Antitrust Law: U.S. and Japanese Approaches Harvard Business Review case study can use Clayton Christensen Disruptive Innovation strategies to further increase the scale of innovtions in the organization.
Cross disciplinary teams
– Horizontal connected teams at the Jurisdiction Antitrust are driving operational speed, building greater agility, and keeping the organization nimble to compete with new competitors. It helps are organization to ideate new ideas, and execute them swiftly in the marketplace.
Organizational Resilience of Jurisdiction Antitrust
– The covid-19 pandemic has put organizational resilience at the centre of everthing that Jurisdiction Antitrust does. Organizational resilience comprises - Financial Resilience, Operational Resilience, Technological Resilience, Organizational Resilience, Business Model Resilience, and Reputation Resilience.
Highly skilled collaborators
– Jurisdiction Antitrust has highly efficient outsourcing and offshoring strategy. It has resulted in greater operational flexibility and bringing down the costs in highly price sensitive segment. Secondly the value chain collaborators of the firm in Extraterritorial Applications of Antitrust Law: U.S. and Japanese Approaches HBR case study have helped the firm to develop new products and bring them quickly to the marketplace.
Sustainable margins compare to other players in Global Business industry
– Extraterritorial Applications of Antitrust Law: U.S. and Japanese Approaches firm has clearly differentiated products in the market place. This has enabled Jurisdiction Antitrust to fetch slight price premium compare to the competitors in the Global Business industry. The sustainable margins have also helped Jurisdiction Antitrust to invest into research and development (R&D) and innovation.
Analytics focus
– Jurisdiction Antitrust is putting a lot of focus on utilizing the power of analytics in business decision making. This has put it among the leading players in the industry. The technology infrastructure suggested by Guhan Subramanian, Michelle Kalka can also help it to harness the power of analytics for – marketing optimization, demand forecasting, customer relationship management, inventory management, information sharing across the value chain etc.
Superior customer experience
– The customer experience strategy of Jurisdiction Antitrust in the segment is based on four key concepts – personalization, simplification of complex needs, prompt response, and continuous engagement.
Ability to recruit top talent
– Jurisdiction Antitrust is one of the leading recruiters in the industry. Managers in the Extraterritorial Applications of Antitrust Law: U.S. and Japanese Approaches are in a position to attract the best talent available. The firm has a robust talent identification program that helps in identifying the brightest.
Diverse revenue streams
– Jurisdiction Antitrust is present in almost all the verticals within the industry. This has provided firm in Extraterritorial Applications of Antitrust Law: U.S. and Japanese Approaches case study a diverse revenue stream that has helped it to survive disruptions such as global pandemic in Covid-19, financial disruption of 2008, and supply chain disruption of 2021.
Operational resilience
– The operational resilience strategy in the Extraterritorial Applications of Antitrust Law: U.S. and Japanese Approaches Harvard Business Review case study comprises – understanding the underlying the factors in the industry, building diversified operations across different geographies so that disruption in one part of the world doesn’t impact the overall performance of the firm, and integrating the various business operations and processes through its digital transformation drive.
High switching costs
– The high switching costs that Jurisdiction Antitrust has built up over years in its products and services combo offer has resulted in high retention of customers, lower marketing costs, and greater ability of the firm to focus on its customers.
Successful track record of launching new products
– Jurisdiction Antitrust has launched numerous new products in last few years, keeping in mind evolving customer preferences and competitive pressures. Jurisdiction Antitrust has effective processes in place that helps in exploring new product needs, doing quick pilot testing, and then launching the products quickly using its extensive distribution network.
Weaknesses Extraterritorial Applications of Antitrust Law: U.S. and Japanese Approaches | Internal Strategic Factors
What are Weaknesses in SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis
The weaknesses of Extraterritorial Applications of Antitrust Law: U.S. and Japanese Approaches are -
No frontier risks strategy
– After analyzing the HBR case study Extraterritorial Applications of Antitrust Law: U.S. and Japanese Approaches, it seems that company is thinking about the frontier risks that can impact Global Business strategy. But it has very little resources allocation to manage the risks emerging from events such as natural disasters, climate change, melting of permafrost, tacking the rise of artificial intelligence, opportunities and threats emerging from commercialization of space etc.
High cash cycle compare to competitors
Jurisdiction Antitrust has a high cash cycle compare to other players in the industry. It needs to shorten the cash cycle by 12% to be more competitive in the marketplace, reduce inventory costs, and be more profitable.
Ability to respond to the competition
– As the decision making is very deliberative, highlighted in the case study Extraterritorial Applications of Antitrust Law: U.S. and Japanese Approaches, in the dynamic environment Jurisdiction Antitrust has struggled to respond to the nimble upstart competition. Jurisdiction Antitrust has reasonably good record with similar level competitors but it has struggled with new entrants taking away niches of its business.
Employees’ incomplete understanding of strategy
– From the instances in the HBR case study Extraterritorial Applications of Antitrust Law: U.S. and Japanese Approaches, it seems that the employees of Jurisdiction Antitrust don’t have comprehensive understanding of the firm’s strategy. This is reflected in number of promotional campaigns over the last few years that had mixed messaging and competing priorities. Some of the strategic activities and services promoted in the promotional campaigns were not consistent with the organization’s strategy.
Low market penetration in new markets
– Outside its home market of Jurisdiction Antitrust, firm in the HBR case study Extraterritorial Applications of Antitrust Law: U.S. and Japanese Approaches needs to spend more promotional, marketing, and advertising efforts to penetrate international markets.
Capital Spending Reduction
– Even during the low interest decade, Jurisdiction Antitrust has not been able to do capital spending to the tune of the competition. This has resulted into fewer innovations and company facing stiff competition from both existing competitors and new entrants who are disrupting the industry using digital technology.
Slow to harness new channels of communication
– Even though competitors are using new communication channels such as Instagram, Tiktok, and Snap, Jurisdiction Antitrust is slow explore the new channels of communication. These new channels of communication mentioned in marketing section of case study Extraterritorial Applications of Antitrust Law: U.S. and Japanese Approaches can help to provide better information regarding products and services. It can also build an online community to further reach out to potential customers.
High operating costs
– Compare to the competitors, firm in the HBR case study Extraterritorial Applications of Antitrust Law: U.S. and Japanese Approaches has high operating costs in the. This can be harder to sustain given the new emerging competition from nimble players who are using technology to attract Jurisdiction Antitrust 's lucrative customers.
Workers concerns about automation
– As automation is fast increasing in the segment, Jurisdiction Antitrust needs to come up with a strategy to reduce the workers concern regarding automation. Without a clear strategy, it could lead to disruption and uncertainty within the organization.
Increasing silos among functional specialists
– The organizational structure of Jurisdiction Antitrust is dominated by functional specialists. It is not different from other players in the Global Business segment. Jurisdiction Antitrust needs to de-silo the office environment to harness the true potential of its workforce. Secondly the de-silo will also help Jurisdiction Antitrust to focus more on services rather than just following the product oriented approach.
Skills based hiring
– The stress on hiring functional specialists at Jurisdiction Antitrust has created an environment where the organization is dominated by functional specialists rather than management generalist. This has resulted into product oriented approach rather than marketing oriented approach or consumers oriented approach.
Opportunities Extraterritorial Applications of Antitrust Law: U.S. and Japanese Approaches | External Strategic Factors
What are Opportunities in the SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis
The opportunities highlighted in the Harvard Business Review case study Extraterritorial Applications of Antitrust Law: U.S. and Japanese Approaches are -
Finding new ways to collaborate
– Covid-19 has not only transformed business models of companies in Global Business industry, but it has also influenced the consumer preferences. Jurisdiction Antitrust can tie-up with other value chain partners to explore new opportunities regarding meeting customer demands and building a rewarding and engaging relationship.
Buying journey improvements
– Jurisdiction Antitrust can improve the customer journey of consumers in the industry by using analytics and artificial intelligence. Extraterritorial Applications of Antitrust Law: U.S. and Japanese Approaches suggest that firm can provide automated chats to help consumers solve their own problems, provide online suggestions to get maximum out of the products and services, and help consumers to build a community where they can interact with each other to develop new features and uses.
Better consumer reach
– The expansion of the 5G network will help Jurisdiction Antitrust to increase its market reach. Jurisdiction Antitrust will be able to reach out to new customers. Secondly 5G will also provide technology framework to build new tools and products that can help more immersive consumer experience and faster consumer journey.
Reconfiguring business model
– The expansion of digital payment system, the bringing down of international transactions costs using Bitcoin and other blockchain based currencies, etc can help Jurisdiction Antitrust to reconfigure its entire business model. For example it can used blockchain based technologies to reduce piracy of its products in the big markets such as China. Secondly it can use the popularity of e-commerce in various developing markets to build a Direct to Customer business model rather than the current Channel Heavy distribution network.
Remote work and new talent hiring opportunities
– The widespread usage of remote working technologies during Covid-19 has opened opportunities for Jurisdiction Antitrust to expand its talent hiring zone. According to McKinsey Global Institute, 20% of the high end workforce in fields such as finance, information technology, can continously work from remote local post Covid-19. This presents a really great opportunity for Jurisdiction Antitrust to hire the very best people irrespective of their geographical location.
Leveraging digital technologies
– Jurisdiction Antitrust can leverage digital technologies such as artificial intelligence and machine learning to automate the production process, customer analytics to get better insights into consumer behavior, realtime digital dashboards to get better sales tracking, logistics and transportation, product tracking, etc.
Using analytics as competitive advantage
– Jurisdiction Antitrust has spent a significant amount of money and effort to integrate analytics and machine learning into its operations in the sector. This continuous investment in analytics has enabled, as illustrated in the Harvard case study Extraterritorial Applications of Antitrust Law: U.S. and Japanese Approaches - to build a competitive advantage using analytics. The analytics driven competitive advantage can help Jurisdiction Antitrust to build faster Go To Market strategies, better consumer insights, developing relevant product features, and building a highly efficient supply chain.
Creating value in data economy
– The success of analytics program of Jurisdiction Antitrust has opened avenues for new revenue streams for the organization in the industry. This can help Jurisdiction Antitrust to build a more holistic ecosystem as suggested in the Extraterritorial Applications of Antitrust Law: U.S. and Japanese Approaches case study. Jurisdiction Antitrust can build new products and services such as - data insight services, data privacy related products, data based consulting services, etc.
Increase in government spending
– As the United States and other governments are increasing social spending and infrastructure spending to build economies post Covid-19, Jurisdiction Antitrust can use these opportunities to build new business models that can help the communities that Jurisdiction Antitrust operates in. Secondly it can use opportunities from government spending in Global Business sector.
Learning at scale
– Online learning technologies has now opened space for Jurisdiction Antitrust to conduct training and development for its employees across the world. This will result in not only reducing the cost of training but also help employees in different part of the world to integrate with the headquarter work culture, ethos, and standards.
Developing new processes and practices
– Jurisdiction Antitrust can develop new processes and procedures in Global Business industry using technology such as automation using artificial intelligence, real time transportation and products tracking, 3D modeling for concept development and new products pilot testing etc.
Redefining models of collaboration and team work
– As explained in the weaknesses section, Jurisdiction Antitrust is facing challenges because of the dominance of functional experts in the organization. Extraterritorial Applications of Antitrust Law: U.S. and Japanese Approaches case study suggests that firm can utilize new technology to build more coordinated teams and streamline operations and communications using tools such as CAD, Zoom, etc.
Building a culture of innovation
– managers at Jurisdiction Antitrust can make experimentation a productive activity and build a culture of innovation using approaches such as – mining transaction data, A/B testing of websites and selling platforms, engaging potential customers over various needs, and building on small ideas in the Global Business segment.
Threats Extraterritorial Applications of Antitrust Law: U.S. and Japanese Approaches External Strategic Factors
What are Threats in the SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis
The threats mentioned in the HBR case study Extraterritorial Applications of Antitrust Law: U.S. and Japanese Approaches are -
High dependence on third party suppliers
– Jurisdiction Antitrust high dependence on third party suppliers can disrupt its processes and delivery mechanism. For example -the current troubles of car makers because of chip shortage is because the chip companies started producing chips for electronic companies rather than car manufacturers.
Easy access to finance
– Easy access to finance in Global Business field will also reduce the barriers to entry in the industry, thus putting downward pressure on the prices because of increasing competition. Jurisdiction Antitrust can utilize it by borrowing at lower rates and invest it into research and development, capital expenditure to fortify its core competitive advantage.
Consumer confidence and its impact on Jurisdiction Antitrust demand
– There is a high probability of declining consumer confidence, given – high inflammation rate, rise of gig economy, lower job stability, increasing cost of living, higher interest rates, and aging demography. All the factors contribute to people saving higher rate of their income, resulting in lower consumer demand in the industry and other sectors.
High level of anxiety and lack of motivation
– the Great Resignation in United States is the sign of broader dissatisfaction among the workforce in United States. Jurisdiction Antitrust needs to understand the core reasons impacting the Global Business industry. This will help it in building a better workplace.
Aging population
– As the populations of most advanced economies are aging, it will lead to high social security costs, higher savings among population, and lower demand for goods and services in the economy. The household savings in US, France, UK, Germany, and Japan are growing faster than predicted because of uncertainty caused by pandemic.
Capital market disruption
– During the Covid-19, Dow Jones has touched record high. The valuations of a number of companies are way beyond their existing business model potential. This can lead to capital market correction which can put a number of suppliers, collaborators, value chain partners in great financial difficulty. It will directly impact the business of Jurisdiction Antitrust.
Shortening product life cycle
– it is one of the major threat that Jurisdiction Antitrust is facing in Global Business sector. It can lead to higher research and development costs, higher marketing expenses, lower customer loyalty, etc.
Technology acceleration in Forth Industrial Revolution
– Jurisdiction Antitrust has witnessed rapid integration of technology during Covid-19 in the Global Business industry. As one of the leading players in the industry, Jurisdiction Antitrust needs to keep up with the evolution of technology in the Global Business sector. According to Mckinsey study top managers believe that the adoption of technology in operations, communications is 20-25 times faster than what they planned in the beginning of 2019.
Backlash against dominant players
– US Congress and other legislative arms of the government are getting tough on big business especially technology companies. The digital arm of Jurisdiction Antitrust business can come under increasing regulations regarding data privacy, data security, etc.
Stagnating economy with rate increase
– Jurisdiction Antitrust can face lack of demand in the market place because of Fed actions to reduce inflation. This can lead to sluggish growth in the economy, lower demands, lower investments, higher borrowing costs, and consolidation in the field.
Instability in the European markets
– European Union markets are facing three big challenges post Covid – expanded balance sheets, Brexit related business disruption, and aggressive Russia looking to distract the existing security mechanism. Jurisdiction Antitrust will face different problems in different parts of Europe. For example it will face inflationary pressures in UK, France, and Germany, balance sheet expansion and demand challenges in Southern European countries, and geopolitical instability in the Eastern Europe.
Regulatory challenges
– Jurisdiction Antitrust needs to prepare for regulatory challenges as consumer protection groups and other pressure groups are vigorously advocating for more regulations on big business - to reduce inequality, to create a level playing field, to product data privacy and consumer privacy, to reduce the influence of big money on democratic institutions, etc. This can lead to significant changes in the Global Business industry regulations.
Barriers of entry lowering
– As technology is more democratized, the barriers to entry in the industry are lowering. It can presents Jurisdiction Antitrust with greater competitive threats in the near to medium future. Secondly it will also put downward pressure on pricing throughout the sector.
Weighted SWOT Analysis of Extraterritorial Applications of Antitrust Law: U.S. and Japanese Approaches Template, Example
Not all factors mentioned under the Strengths, Weakness, Opportunities, and Threats quadrants in the SWOT Analysis are equal. Managers in the HBR case study Extraterritorial Applications of Antitrust Law: U.S. and Japanese Approaches needs to zero down on the relative importance of each factor mentioned in the Strengths, Weakness, Opportunities, and Threats quadrants.
We can provide the relative importance to each factor by assigning relative weights. Weighted SWOT analysis process is a three stage process –
First stage for doing weighted SWOT analysis of the case study Extraterritorial Applications of Antitrust Law: U.S. and Japanese Approaches is to rank the strengths and weaknesses of the organization. This will help you to assess the most important strengths and weaknesses of the firm and which one of the strengths and weaknesses mentioned in the initial lists are marginal and can be left out.
Second stage for conducting weighted SWOT analysis of the Harvard case study Extraterritorial Applications of Antitrust Law: U.S. and Japanese Approaches is to give probabilities to the external strategic factors thus better understanding the opportunities and threats arising out of macro environment changes and developments.
Third stage of constructing weighted SWOT analysis of Extraterritorial Applications of Antitrust Law: U.S. and Japanese Approaches is to provide strategic recommendations includes – joining likelihood of external strategic factors such as opportunities and threats to the internal strategic factors – strengths and weaknesses. You should start with external factors as they will provide the direction of the overall industry. Secondly by joining probabilities with internal strategic factors can help the company not only strategic fit but also the most probably strategic trade-off that Jurisdiction Antitrust needs to make to build a sustainable competitive advantage.