Extraterritorial Applications of Antitrust Law: U.S. and Japanese Approaches SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis
Global Business
Strategy / MBA Resources
Case Study SWOT Analysis Solution
Case Study Description of Extraterritorial Applications of Antitrust Law: U.S. and Japanese Approaches
This case describes the differebt approaches the United States and Japan have taken to extend the jurisdiction of their antitrust laws to foreign companies. The section on the United States, in particular, focuses on the evolving logic of the Supreme Court in dealing with these issues. It presents the case of United States vs. Nippon Paper Industries Co. Ltd. and demonstrates the difficulties of applying somewhat abstract principles of jurisdiction to a real-life situation.
Swot Analysis of "Extraterritorial Applications of Antitrust Law: U.S. and Japanese Approaches" written by Guhan Subramanian, Michelle Kalka includes – strengths weakness that are internal strategic factors of the organization, and opportunities and threats that Jurisdiction Antitrust facing as an external strategic factors. Some of the topics covered in Extraterritorial Applications of Antitrust Law: U.S. and Japanese Approaches case study are - Strategic Management Strategies, Competition, Pricing, Regulation and Global Business.
Some of the macro environment factors that can be used to understand the Extraterritorial Applications of Antitrust Law: U.S. and Japanese Approaches casestudy better are - – cloud computing is disrupting traditional business models, technology disruption, supply chains are disrupted by pandemic , increasing transportation and logistics costs, increasing household debt because of falling income levels, geopolitical disruptions, there is increasing trade war between United States & China,
increasing inequality as vast percentage of new income is going to the top 1%, challanges to central banks by blockchain based private currencies, etc
Introduction to SWOT Analysis of Extraterritorial Applications of Antitrust Law: U.S. and Japanese Approaches
SWOT stands for an organization’s Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats . At Oak Spring University , we believe that protagonist in Extraterritorial Applications of Antitrust Law: U.S. and Japanese Approaches case study can use SWOT analysis as a strategic management tool to assess the current internal strengths and weaknesses of the Jurisdiction Antitrust, and to figure out the opportunities and threats in the macro environment – technological, environmental, political, economic, social, demographic, etc in which Jurisdiction Antitrust operates in.
According to Harvard Business Review, 75% of the managers use SWOT analysis for various purposes such as – evaluating current scenario, strategic planning, new venture feasibility, personal growth goals, new market entry, Go To market strategies, portfolio management and strategic trade-off assessment, organizational restructuring, etc.
SWOT Objectives / Importance of SWOT Analysis and SWOT Matrix
SWOT analysis of Extraterritorial Applications of Antitrust Law: U.S. and Japanese Approaches can be done for the following purposes –
1. Strategic planning using facts provided in Extraterritorial Applications of Antitrust Law: U.S. and Japanese Approaches case study
2. Improving business portfolio management of Jurisdiction Antitrust
3. Assessing feasibility of the new initiative in Global Business field.
4. Making a Global Business topic specific business decision
5. Set goals for the organization
6. Organizational restructuring of Jurisdiction Antitrust
Strengths Extraterritorial Applications of Antitrust Law: U.S. and Japanese Approaches | Internal Strategic Factors
What are Strengths in SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis
The strengths of Jurisdiction Antitrust in Extraterritorial Applications of Antitrust Law: U.S. and Japanese Approaches Harvard Business Review case study are -
Superior customer experience
– The customer experience strategy of Jurisdiction Antitrust in the segment is based on four key concepts – personalization, simplification of complex needs, prompt response, and continuous engagement.
Sustainable margins compare to other players in Global Business industry
– Extraterritorial Applications of Antitrust Law: U.S. and Japanese Approaches firm has clearly differentiated products in the market place. This has enabled Jurisdiction Antitrust to fetch slight price premium compare to the competitors in the Global Business industry. The sustainable margins have also helped Jurisdiction Antitrust to invest into research and development (R&D) and innovation.
Diverse revenue streams
– Jurisdiction Antitrust is present in almost all the verticals within the industry. This has provided firm in Extraterritorial Applications of Antitrust Law: U.S. and Japanese Approaches case study a diverse revenue stream that has helped it to survive disruptions such as global pandemic in Covid-19, financial disruption of 2008, and supply chain disruption of 2021.
High switching costs
– The high switching costs that Jurisdiction Antitrust has built up over years in its products and services combo offer has resulted in high retention of customers, lower marketing costs, and greater ability of the firm to focus on its customers.
Digital Transformation in Global Business segment
- digital transformation varies from industry to industry. For Jurisdiction Antitrust digital transformation journey comprises differing goals based on market maturity, customer technology acceptance, and organizational culture. Jurisdiction Antitrust has successfully integrated the four key components of digital transformation – digital integration in processes, digital integration in marketing and customer relationship management, digital integration into the value chain, and using technology to explore new products and market opportunities.
Highly skilled collaborators
– Jurisdiction Antitrust has highly efficient outsourcing and offshoring strategy. It has resulted in greater operational flexibility and bringing down the costs in highly price sensitive segment. Secondly the value chain collaborators of the firm in Extraterritorial Applications of Antitrust Law: U.S. and Japanese Approaches HBR case study have helped the firm to develop new products and bring them quickly to the marketplace.
Successful track record of launching new products
– Jurisdiction Antitrust has launched numerous new products in last few years, keeping in mind evolving customer preferences and competitive pressures. Jurisdiction Antitrust has effective processes in place that helps in exploring new product needs, doing quick pilot testing, and then launching the products quickly using its extensive distribution network.
Low bargaining power of suppliers
– Suppliers of Jurisdiction Antitrust in the sector have low bargaining power. Extraterritorial Applications of Antitrust Law: U.S. and Japanese Approaches has further diversified its suppliers portfolio by building a robust supply chain across various countries. This helps Jurisdiction Antitrust to manage not only supply disruptions but also source products at highly competitive prices.
Cross disciplinary teams
– Horizontal connected teams at the Jurisdiction Antitrust are driving operational speed, building greater agility, and keeping the organization nimble to compete with new competitors. It helps are organization to ideate new ideas, and execute them swiftly in the marketplace.
Organizational Resilience of Jurisdiction Antitrust
– The covid-19 pandemic has put organizational resilience at the centre of everthing that Jurisdiction Antitrust does. Organizational resilience comprises - Financial Resilience, Operational Resilience, Technological Resilience, Organizational Resilience, Business Model Resilience, and Reputation Resilience.
Ability to lead change in Global Business field
– Jurisdiction Antitrust is one of the leading players in its industry. Over the years it has not only transformed the business landscape in its segment but also across the whole industry. The ability to lead change has enabled Jurisdiction Antitrust in – penetrating new markets, reaching out to new customers, and providing different value propositions to different customers in the international markets.
Effective Research and Development (R&D)
– Jurisdiction Antitrust has innovation driven culture where significant part of the revenues are spent on the research and development activities. This has resulted in, as mentioned in case study Extraterritorial Applications of Antitrust Law: U.S. and Japanese Approaches - staying ahead in the industry in terms of – new product launches, superior customer experience, highly competitive pricing strategies, and great returns to the shareholders.
Weaknesses Extraterritorial Applications of Antitrust Law: U.S. and Japanese Approaches | Internal Strategic Factors
What are Weaknesses in SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis
The weaknesses of Extraterritorial Applications of Antitrust Law: U.S. and Japanese Approaches are -
Slow to strategic competitive environment developments
– As Extraterritorial Applications of Antitrust Law: U.S. and Japanese Approaches HBR case study mentions - Jurisdiction Antitrust takes time to assess the upcoming competitions. This has led to missing out on atleast 2-3 big opportunities in the industry in last five years.
Interest costs
– Compare to the competition, Jurisdiction Antitrust has borrowed money from the capital market at higher rates. It needs to restructure the interest payment and costs so that it can compete better and improve profitability.
Products dominated business model
– Even though Jurisdiction Antitrust has some of the most successful products in the industry, this business model has made each new product launch extremely critical for continuous financial growth of the organization. firm in the HBR case study - Extraterritorial Applications of Antitrust Law: U.S. and Japanese Approaches should strive to include more intangible value offerings along with its core products and services.
Skills based hiring
– The stress on hiring functional specialists at Jurisdiction Antitrust has created an environment where the organization is dominated by functional specialists rather than management generalist. This has resulted into product oriented approach rather than marketing oriented approach or consumers oriented approach.
No frontier risks strategy
– After analyzing the HBR case study Extraterritorial Applications of Antitrust Law: U.S. and Japanese Approaches, it seems that company is thinking about the frontier risks that can impact Global Business strategy. But it has very little resources allocation to manage the risks emerging from events such as natural disasters, climate change, melting of permafrost, tacking the rise of artificial intelligence, opportunities and threats emerging from commercialization of space etc.
High operating costs
– Compare to the competitors, firm in the HBR case study Extraterritorial Applications of Antitrust Law: U.S. and Japanese Approaches has high operating costs in the. This can be harder to sustain given the new emerging competition from nimble players who are using technology to attract Jurisdiction Antitrust 's lucrative customers.
Compensation and incentives
– The revenue per employee as mentioned in the HBR case study Extraterritorial Applications of Antitrust Law: U.S. and Japanese Approaches, is just above the industry average. Jurisdiction Antitrust needs to redesign the compensation structure and incentives to increase the revenue per employees. Some of the steps that it can take are – hiring more specialists on project basis, etc.
Low market penetration in new markets
– Outside its home market of Jurisdiction Antitrust, firm in the HBR case study Extraterritorial Applications of Antitrust Law: U.S. and Japanese Approaches needs to spend more promotional, marketing, and advertising efforts to penetrate international markets.
Aligning sales with marketing
– It come across in the case study Extraterritorial Applications of Antitrust Law: U.S. and Japanese Approaches that the firm needs to have more collaboration between its sales team and marketing team. Sales professionals in the industry have deep experience in developing customer relationships. Marketing department in the case Extraterritorial Applications of Antitrust Law: U.S. and Japanese Approaches can leverage the sales team experience to cultivate customer relationships as Jurisdiction Antitrust is planning to shift buying processes online.
Increasing silos among functional specialists
– The organizational structure of Jurisdiction Antitrust is dominated by functional specialists. It is not different from other players in the Global Business segment. Jurisdiction Antitrust needs to de-silo the office environment to harness the true potential of its workforce. Secondly the de-silo will also help Jurisdiction Antitrust to focus more on services rather than just following the product oriented approach.
High dependence on existing supply chain
– The disruption in the global supply chains because of the Covid-19 pandemic and blockage of the Suez Canal illustrated the fragile nature of Jurisdiction Antitrust supply chain. Even after few cautionary changes mentioned in the HBR case study - Extraterritorial Applications of Antitrust Law: U.S. and Japanese Approaches, it is still heavily dependent upon the existing supply chain. The existing supply chain though brings in cost efficiencies but it has left Jurisdiction Antitrust vulnerable to further global disruptions in South East Asia.
Opportunities Extraterritorial Applications of Antitrust Law: U.S. and Japanese Approaches | External Strategic Factors
What are Opportunities in the SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis
The opportunities highlighted in the Harvard Business Review case study Extraterritorial Applications of Antitrust Law: U.S. and Japanese Approaches are -
Reforming the budgeting process
- By establishing new metrics that will be used to evaluate both existing and potential projects Jurisdiction Antitrust can not only reduce the costs of the project but also help it in integrating the projects with other processes within the organization.
Increase in government spending
– As the United States and other governments are increasing social spending and infrastructure spending to build economies post Covid-19, Jurisdiction Antitrust can use these opportunities to build new business models that can help the communities that Jurisdiction Antitrust operates in. Secondly it can use opportunities from government spending in Global Business sector.
Learning at scale
– Online learning technologies has now opened space for Jurisdiction Antitrust to conduct training and development for its employees across the world. This will result in not only reducing the cost of training but also help employees in different part of the world to integrate with the headquarter work culture, ethos, and standards.
Better consumer reach
– The expansion of the 5G network will help Jurisdiction Antitrust to increase its market reach. Jurisdiction Antitrust will be able to reach out to new customers. Secondly 5G will also provide technology framework to build new tools and products that can help more immersive consumer experience and faster consumer journey.
Finding new ways to collaborate
– Covid-19 has not only transformed business models of companies in Global Business industry, but it has also influenced the consumer preferences. Jurisdiction Antitrust can tie-up with other value chain partners to explore new opportunities regarding meeting customer demands and building a rewarding and engaging relationship.
Leveraging digital technologies
– Jurisdiction Antitrust can leverage digital technologies such as artificial intelligence and machine learning to automate the production process, customer analytics to get better insights into consumer behavior, realtime digital dashboards to get better sales tracking, logistics and transportation, product tracking, etc.
Reconfiguring business model
– The expansion of digital payment system, the bringing down of international transactions costs using Bitcoin and other blockchain based currencies, etc can help Jurisdiction Antitrust to reconfigure its entire business model. For example it can used blockchain based technologies to reduce piracy of its products in the big markets such as China. Secondly it can use the popularity of e-commerce in various developing markets to build a Direct to Customer business model rather than the current Channel Heavy distribution network.
Identify volunteer opportunities
– Covid-19 has impacted working population in two ways – it has led to people soul searching about their professional choices, resulting in mass resignation. Secondly it has encouraged people to do things that they are passionate about. This has opened opportunities for businesses to build volunteer oriented socially driven projects. Jurisdiction Antitrust can explore opportunities that can attract volunteers and are consistent with its mission and vision.
Harnessing reconfiguration of the global supply chains
– As the trade war between US and China heats up in the coming years, Jurisdiction Antitrust can build a diversified supply chain model across various countries in - South East Asia, India, and other parts of the world. This reconfiguration of global supply chain can help, as suggested in case study, Extraterritorial Applications of Antitrust Law: U.S. and Japanese Approaches, to buy more products closer to the markets, and it can leverage its size and influence to get better deal from the local markets.
Loyalty marketing
– Jurisdiction Antitrust has focused on building a highly responsive customer relationship management platform. This platform is built on in-house data and driven by analytics and artificial intelligence. The customer analytics can help the organization to fine tune its loyalty marketing efforts, increase the wallet share of the organization, reduce wastage on mainstream advertising spending, build better pricing strategies using personalization, etc.
Use of Bitcoin and other crypto currencies for transactions
– The popularity of Bitcoin and other crypto currencies as asset class and medium of transaction has opened new opportunities for Jurisdiction Antitrust in the consumer business. Now Jurisdiction Antitrust can target international markets with far fewer capital restrictions requirements than the existing system.
Remote work and new talent hiring opportunities
– The widespread usage of remote working technologies during Covid-19 has opened opportunities for Jurisdiction Antitrust to expand its talent hiring zone. According to McKinsey Global Institute, 20% of the high end workforce in fields such as finance, information technology, can continously work from remote local post Covid-19. This presents a really great opportunity for Jurisdiction Antitrust to hire the very best people irrespective of their geographical location.
Lowering marketing communication costs
– 5G expansion will open new opportunities for Jurisdiction Antitrust in the field of marketing communication. It will bring down the cost of doing business, provide technology platform to build new products in the Global Business segment, and it will provide faster access to the consumers.
Threats Extraterritorial Applications of Antitrust Law: U.S. and Japanese Approaches External Strategic Factors
What are Threats in the SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis
The threats mentioned in the HBR case study Extraterritorial Applications of Antitrust Law: U.S. and Japanese Approaches are -
New competition
– After the dotcom bust of 2001, financial crisis of 2008-09, the business formation in US economy had declined. But in 2020 alone, there are more than 1.5 million new business applications in United States. This can lead to greater competition for Jurisdiction Antitrust in the Global Business sector and impact the bottomline of the organization.
Barriers of entry lowering
– As technology is more democratized, the barriers to entry in the industry are lowering. It can presents Jurisdiction Antitrust with greater competitive threats in the near to medium future. Secondly it will also put downward pressure on pricing throughout the sector.
High level of anxiety and lack of motivation
– the Great Resignation in United States is the sign of broader dissatisfaction among the workforce in United States. Jurisdiction Antitrust needs to understand the core reasons impacting the Global Business industry. This will help it in building a better workplace.
Aging population
– As the populations of most advanced economies are aging, it will lead to high social security costs, higher savings among population, and lower demand for goods and services in the economy. The household savings in US, France, UK, Germany, and Japan are growing faster than predicted because of uncertainty caused by pandemic.
Environmental challenges
– Jurisdiction Antitrust needs to have a robust strategy against the disruptions arising from climate change and energy requirements. EU has identified it as key priority area and spending 30% of its 880 billion Euros European post Covid-19 recovery funds on green technology. Jurisdiction Antitrust can take advantage of this fund but it will also bring new competitors in the Global Business industry.
Regulatory challenges
– Jurisdiction Antitrust needs to prepare for regulatory challenges as consumer protection groups and other pressure groups are vigorously advocating for more regulations on big business - to reduce inequality, to create a level playing field, to product data privacy and consumer privacy, to reduce the influence of big money on democratic institutions, etc. This can lead to significant changes in the Global Business industry regulations.
Shortening product life cycle
– it is one of the major threat that Jurisdiction Antitrust is facing in Global Business sector. It can lead to higher research and development costs, higher marketing expenses, lower customer loyalty, etc.
Backlash against dominant players
– US Congress and other legislative arms of the government are getting tough on big business especially technology companies. The digital arm of Jurisdiction Antitrust business can come under increasing regulations regarding data privacy, data security, etc.
Capital market disruption
– During the Covid-19, Dow Jones has touched record high. The valuations of a number of companies are way beyond their existing business model potential. This can lead to capital market correction which can put a number of suppliers, collaborators, value chain partners in great financial difficulty. It will directly impact the business of Jurisdiction Antitrust.
Technology acceleration in Forth Industrial Revolution
– Jurisdiction Antitrust has witnessed rapid integration of technology during Covid-19 in the Global Business industry. As one of the leading players in the industry, Jurisdiction Antitrust needs to keep up with the evolution of technology in the Global Business sector. According to Mckinsey study top managers believe that the adoption of technology in operations, communications is 20-25 times faster than what they planned in the beginning of 2019.
Trade war between China and United States
– The trade war between two of the biggest economies can hugely impact the opportunities for Jurisdiction Antitrust in the Global Business industry. The Global Business industry is already at various protected from local competition in China, with the rise of trade war the protection levels may go up. This presents a clear threat of current business model in Chinese market.
Instability in the European markets
– European Union markets are facing three big challenges post Covid – expanded balance sheets, Brexit related business disruption, and aggressive Russia looking to distract the existing security mechanism. Jurisdiction Antitrust will face different problems in different parts of Europe. For example it will face inflationary pressures in UK, France, and Germany, balance sheet expansion and demand challenges in Southern European countries, and geopolitical instability in the Eastern Europe.
Learning curve for new practices
– As the technology based on artificial intelligence and machine learning platform is getting complex, as highlighted in case study Extraterritorial Applications of Antitrust Law: U.S. and Japanese Approaches, Jurisdiction Antitrust may face longer learning curve for training and development of existing employees. This can open space for more nimble competitors in the field of Global Business .
Weighted SWOT Analysis of Extraterritorial Applications of Antitrust Law: U.S. and Japanese Approaches Template, Example
Not all factors mentioned under the Strengths, Weakness, Opportunities, and Threats quadrants in the SWOT Analysis are equal. Managers in the HBR case study Extraterritorial Applications of Antitrust Law: U.S. and Japanese Approaches needs to zero down on the relative importance of each factor mentioned in the Strengths, Weakness, Opportunities, and Threats quadrants.
We can provide the relative importance to each factor by assigning relative weights. Weighted SWOT analysis process is a three stage process –
First stage for doing weighted SWOT analysis of the case study Extraterritorial Applications of Antitrust Law: U.S. and Japanese Approaches is to rank the strengths and weaknesses of the organization. This will help you to assess the most important strengths and weaknesses of the firm and which one of the strengths and weaknesses mentioned in the initial lists are marginal and can be left out.
Second stage for conducting weighted SWOT analysis of the Harvard case study Extraterritorial Applications of Antitrust Law: U.S. and Japanese Approaches is to give probabilities to the external strategic factors thus better understanding the opportunities and threats arising out of macro environment changes and developments.
Third stage of constructing weighted SWOT analysis of Extraterritorial Applications of Antitrust Law: U.S. and Japanese Approaches is to provide strategic recommendations includes – joining likelihood of external strategic factors such as opportunities and threats to the internal strategic factors – strengths and weaknesses. You should start with external factors as they will provide the direction of the overall industry. Secondly by joining probabilities with internal strategic factors can help the company not only strategic fit but also the most probably strategic trade-off that Jurisdiction Antitrust needs to make to build a sustainable competitive advantage.
