×




Carbon Engineering SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis

Case Study SWOT Analysis Solution

Case Study Description of Carbon Engineering


Dr. David Keith, President of Carbon Engineering, a company based in Calgary, Alberta, is commercializing a technology to capture carbon dioxide (CO2) from the atmosphere. The company plans to market the captured CO2 to produce low carbon transportation fuels in markets such as California where regulation, derived from a state law designed to manage climate change, restricts the maximum carbon intensity of transportation fuel.

Authors :: Joseph B. Lassiter, Sid Misra

Topics :: Innovation & Entrepreneurship

Tags :: Demographics, Disruptive innovation, Entrepreneurship, Forecasting, Globalization, Managing uncertainty, Marketing, Regulation, Research & development, Risk management, Sustainability, Technology, SWOT Analysis, SWOT Matrix, TOWS, Weighted SWOT Analysis

Swot Analysis of "Carbon Engineering" written by Joseph B. Lassiter, Sid Misra includes – strengths weakness that are internal strategic factors of the organization, and opportunities and threats that Carbon Co2 facing as an external strategic factors. Some of the topics covered in Carbon Engineering case study are - Strategic Management Strategies, Demographics, Disruptive innovation, Entrepreneurship, Forecasting, Globalization, Managing uncertainty, Marketing, Regulation, Research & development, Risk management, Sustainability, Technology and Innovation & Entrepreneurship.


Some of the macro environment factors that can be used to understand the Carbon Engineering casestudy better are - – increasing commodity prices, central banks are concerned over increasing inflation, wage bills are increasing, challanges to central banks by blockchain based private currencies, technology disruption, increasing inequality as vast percentage of new income is going to the top 1%, cloud computing is disrupting traditional business models, there is increasing trade war between United States & China, increasing energy prices, etc



12 Hrs

$59.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

24 Hrs

$49.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

48 Hrs

$39.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now







Introduction to SWOT Analysis of Carbon Engineering


SWOT stands for an organization’s Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats . At Oak Spring University , we believe that protagonist in Carbon Engineering case study can use SWOT analysis as a strategic management tool to assess the current internal strengths and weaknesses of the Carbon Co2, and to figure out the opportunities and threats in the macro environment – technological, environmental, political, economic, social, demographic, etc in which Carbon Co2 operates in.

According to Harvard Business Review, 75% of the managers use SWOT analysis for various purposes such as – evaluating current scenario, strategic planning, new venture feasibility, personal growth goals, new market entry, Go To market strategies, portfolio management and strategic trade-off assessment, organizational restructuring, etc.




SWOT Objectives / Importance of SWOT Analysis and SWOT Matrix


SWOT analysis of Carbon Engineering can be done for the following purposes –
1. Strategic planning using facts provided in Carbon Engineering case study
2. Improving business portfolio management of Carbon Co2
3. Assessing feasibility of the new initiative in Innovation & Entrepreneurship field.
4. Making a Innovation & Entrepreneurship topic specific business decision
5. Set goals for the organization
6. Organizational restructuring of Carbon Co2




Strengths Carbon Engineering | Internal Strategic Factors
What are Strengths in SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis

The strengths of Carbon Co2 in Carbon Engineering Harvard Business Review case study are -

Analytics focus

– Carbon Co2 is putting a lot of focus on utilizing the power of analytics in business decision making. This has put it among the leading players in the industry. The technology infrastructure suggested by Joseph B. Lassiter, Sid Misra can also help it to harness the power of analytics for – marketing optimization, demand forecasting, customer relationship management, inventory management, information sharing across the value chain etc.

Innovation driven organization

– Carbon Co2 is one of the most innovative firm in sector. Manager in Carbon Engineering Harvard Business Review case study can use Clayton Christensen Disruptive Innovation strategies to further increase the scale of innovtions in the organization.

Operational resilience

– The operational resilience strategy in the Carbon Engineering Harvard Business Review case study comprises – understanding the underlying the factors in the industry, building diversified operations across different geographies so that disruption in one part of the world doesn’t impact the overall performance of the firm, and integrating the various business operations and processes through its digital transformation drive.

Highly skilled collaborators

– Carbon Co2 has highly efficient outsourcing and offshoring strategy. It has resulted in greater operational flexibility and bringing down the costs in highly price sensitive segment. Secondly the value chain collaborators of the firm in Carbon Engineering HBR case study have helped the firm to develop new products and bring them quickly to the marketplace.

Strong track record of project management

– Carbon Co2 is known for sticking to its project targets. This enables the firm to manage – time, project costs, and have sustainable margins on the projects.

Organizational Resilience of Carbon Co2

– The covid-19 pandemic has put organizational resilience at the centre of everthing that Carbon Co2 does. Organizational resilience comprises - Financial Resilience, Operational Resilience, Technological Resilience, Organizational Resilience, Business Model Resilience, and Reputation Resilience.

Training and development

– Carbon Co2 has one of the best training and development program in the industry. The effectiveness of the training programs can be measured in Carbon Engineering Harvard Business Review case study by analyzing – employees retention, in-house promotion, loyalty, new venture initiation, lack of conflict, and high level of both employees and customer engagement.

Successful track record of launching new products

– Carbon Co2 has launched numerous new products in last few years, keeping in mind evolving customer preferences and competitive pressures. Carbon Co2 has effective processes in place that helps in exploring new product needs, doing quick pilot testing, and then launching the products quickly using its extensive distribution network.

Sustainable margins compare to other players in Innovation & Entrepreneurship industry

– Carbon Engineering firm has clearly differentiated products in the market place. This has enabled Carbon Co2 to fetch slight price premium compare to the competitors in the Innovation & Entrepreneurship industry. The sustainable margins have also helped Carbon Co2 to invest into research and development (R&D) and innovation.

Effective Research and Development (R&D)

– Carbon Co2 has innovation driven culture where significant part of the revenues are spent on the research and development activities. This has resulted in, as mentioned in case study Carbon Engineering - staying ahead in the industry in terms of – new product launches, superior customer experience, highly competitive pricing strategies, and great returns to the shareholders.

Learning organization

- Carbon Co2 is a learning organization. It has inculcated three key characters of learning organization in its processes and operations – exploration, creativity, and expansiveness. The work place at Carbon Co2 is open place that encourages instructiveness, ideation, open minded discussions, and creativity. Employees and leaders in Carbon Engineering Harvard Business Review case study emphasize – knowledge, initiative, and innovation.

Ability to lead change in Innovation & Entrepreneurship field

– Carbon Co2 is one of the leading players in its industry. Over the years it has not only transformed the business landscape in its segment but also across the whole industry. The ability to lead change has enabled Carbon Co2 in – penetrating new markets, reaching out to new customers, and providing different value propositions to different customers in the international markets.






Weaknesses Carbon Engineering | Internal Strategic Factors
What are Weaknesses in SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis

The weaknesses of Carbon Engineering are -

High bargaining power of channel partners

– Because of the regulatory requirements, Joseph B. Lassiter, Sid Misra suggests that, Carbon Co2 is facing high bargaining power of the channel partners. So far it has not able to streamline the operations to reduce the bargaining power of the value chain partners in the industry.

Interest costs

– Compare to the competition, Carbon Co2 has borrowed money from the capital market at higher rates. It needs to restructure the interest payment and costs so that it can compete better and improve profitability.

Slow to harness new channels of communication

– Even though competitors are using new communication channels such as Instagram, Tiktok, and Snap, Carbon Co2 is slow explore the new channels of communication. These new channels of communication mentioned in marketing section of case study Carbon Engineering can help to provide better information regarding products and services. It can also build an online community to further reach out to potential customers.

High cash cycle compare to competitors

Carbon Co2 has a high cash cycle compare to other players in the industry. It needs to shorten the cash cycle by 12% to be more competitive in the marketplace, reduce inventory costs, and be more profitable.

Skills based hiring

– The stress on hiring functional specialists at Carbon Co2 has created an environment where the organization is dominated by functional specialists rather than management generalist. This has resulted into product oriented approach rather than marketing oriented approach or consumers oriented approach.

Compensation and incentives

– The revenue per employee as mentioned in the HBR case study Carbon Engineering, is just above the industry average. Carbon Co2 needs to redesign the compensation structure and incentives to increase the revenue per employees. Some of the steps that it can take are – hiring more specialists on project basis, etc.

Slow to strategic competitive environment developments

– As Carbon Engineering HBR case study mentions - Carbon Co2 takes time to assess the upcoming competitions. This has led to missing out on atleast 2-3 big opportunities in the industry in last five years.

No frontier risks strategy

– After analyzing the HBR case study Carbon Engineering, it seems that company is thinking about the frontier risks that can impact Innovation & Entrepreneurship strategy. But it has very little resources allocation to manage the risks emerging from events such as natural disasters, climate change, melting of permafrost, tacking the rise of artificial intelligence, opportunities and threats emerging from commercialization of space etc.

Products dominated business model

– Even though Carbon Co2 has some of the most successful products in the industry, this business model has made each new product launch extremely critical for continuous financial growth of the organization. firm in the HBR case study - Carbon Engineering should strive to include more intangible value offerings along with its core products and services.

High dependence on existing supply chain

– The disruption in the global supply chains because of the Covid-19 pandemic and blockage of the Suez Canal illustrated the fragile nature of Carbon Co2 supply chain. Even after few cautionary changes mentioned in the HBR case study - Carbon Engineering, it is still heavily dependent upon the existing supply chain. The existing supply chain though brings in cost efficiencies but it has left Carbon Co2 vulnerable to further global disruptions in South East Asia.

High operating costs

– Compare to the competitors, firm in the HBR case study Carbon Engineering has high operating costs in the. This can be harder to sustain given the new emerging competition from nimble players who are using technology to attract Carbon Co2 's lucrative customers.




Opportunities Carbon Engineering | External Strategic Factors
What are Opportunities in the SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis


The opportunities highlighted in the Harvard Business Review case study Carbon Engineering are -

Creating value in data economy

– The success of analytics program of Carbon Co2 has opened avenues for new revenue streams for the organization in the industry. This can help Carbon Co2 to build a more holistic ecosystem as suggested in the Carbon Engineering case study. Carbon Co2 can build new products and services such as - data insight services, data privacy related products, data based consulting services, etc.

Use of Bitcoin and other crypto currencies for transactions

– The popularity of Bitcoin and other crypto currencies as asset class and medium of transaction has opened new opportunities for Carbon Co2 in the consumer business. Now Carbon Co2 can target international markets with far fewer capital restrictions requirements than the existing system.

Remote work and new talent hiring opportunities

– The widespread usage of remote working technologies during Covid-19 has opened opportunities for Carbon Co2 to expand its talent hiring zone. According to McKinsey Global Institute, 20% of the high end workforce in fields such as finance, information technology, can continously work from remote local post Covid-19. This presents a really great opportunity for Carbon Co2 to hire the very best people irrespective of their geographical location.

Redefining models of collaboration and team work

– As explained in the weaknesses section, Carbon Co2 is facing challenges because of the dominance of functional experts in the organization. Carbon Engineering case study suggests that firm can utilize new technology to build more coordinated teams and streamline operations and communications using tools such as CAD, Zoom, etc.

Identify volunteer opportunities

– Covid-19 has impacted working population in two ways – it has led to people soul searching about their professional choices, resulting in mass resignation. Secondly it has encouraged people to do things that they are passionate about. This has opened opportunities for businesses to build volunteer oriented socially driven projects. Carbon Co2 can explore opportunities that can attract volunteers and are consistent with its mission and vision.

Harnessing reconfiguration of the global supply chains

– As the trade war between US and China heats up in the coming years, Carbon Co2 can build a diversified supply chain model across various countries in - South East Asia, India, and other parts of the world. This reconfiguration of global supply chain can help, as suggested in case study, Carbon Engineering, to buy more products closer to the markets, and it can leverage its size and influence to get better deal from the local markets.

Increase in government spending

– As the United States and other governments are increasing social spending and infrastructure spending to build economies post Covid-19, Carbon Co2 can use these opportunities to build new business models that can help the communities that Carbon Co2 operates in. Secondly it can use opportunities from government spending in Innovation & Entrepreneurship sector.

Finding new ways to collaborate

– Covid-19 has not only transformed business models of companies in Innovation & Entrepreneurship industry, but it has also influenced the consumer preferences. Carbon Co2 can tie-up with other value chain partners to explore new opportunities regarding meeting customer demands and building a rewarding and engaging relationship.

Leveraging digital technologies

– Carbon Co2 can leverage digital technologies such as artificial intelligence and machine learning to automate the production process, customer analytics to get better insights into consumer behavior, realtime digital dashboards to get better sales tracking, logistics and transportation, product tracking, etc.

Learning at scale

– Online learning technologies has now opened space for Carbon Co2 to conduct training and development for its employees across the world. This will result in not only reducing the cost of training but also help employees in different part of the world to integrate with the headquarter work culture, ethos, and standards.

Low interest rates

– Even though inflation is raising its head in most developed economies, Carbon Co2 can still utilize the low interest rates to borrow money for capital investment. Secondly it can also use the increase of government spending in infrastructure projects to get new business.

Buying journey improvements

– Carbon Co2 can improve the customer journey of consumers in the industry by using analytics and artificial intelligence. Carbon Engineering suggest that firm can provide automated chats to help consumers solve their own problems, provide online suggestions to get maximum out of the products and services, and help consumers to build a community where they can interact with each other to develop new features and uses.

Developing new processes and practices

– Carbon Co2 can develop new processes and procedures in Innovation & Entrepreneurship industry using technology such as automation using artificial intelligence, real time transportation and products tracking, 3D modeling for concept development and new products pilot testing etc.




Threats Carbon Engineering External Strategic Factors
What are Threats in the SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis


The threats mentioned in the HBR case study Carbon Engineering are -

Regulatory challenges

– Carbon Co2 needs to prepare for regulatory challenges as consumer protection groups and other pressure groups are vigorously advocating for more regulations on big business - to reduce inequality, to create a level playing field, to product data privacy and consumer privacy, to reduce the influence of big money on democratic institutions, etc. This can lead to significant changes in the Innovation & Entrepreneurship industry regulations.

High level of anxiety and lack of motivation

– the Great Resignation in United States is the sign of broader dissatisfaction among the workforce in United States. Carbon Co2 needs to understand the core reasons impacting the Innovation & Entrepreneurship industry. This will help it in building a better workplace.

Easy access to finance

– Easy access to finance in Innovation & Entrepreneurship field will also reduce the barriers to entry in the industry, thus putting downward pressure on the prices because of increasing competition. Carbon Co2 can utilize it by borrowing at lower rates and invest it into research and development, capital expenditure to fortify its core competitive advantage.

Aging population

– As the populations of most advanced economies are aging, it will lead to high social security costs, higher savings among population, and lower demand for goods and services in the economy. The household savings in US, France, UK, Germany, and Japan are growing faster than predicted because of uncertainty caused by pandemic.

Technology disruption because of hacks, piracy etc

– The colonial pipeline illustrated, how vulnerable modern organization are to international hackers, miscreants, and disruptors. The cyber security interruption, data leaks, etc can seriously jeopardize the future growth of the organization.

High dependence on third party suppliers

– Carbon Co2 high dependence on third party suppliers can disrupt its processes and delivery mechanism. For example -the current troubles of car makers because of chip shortage is because the chip companies started producing chips for electronic companies rather than car manufacturers.

Shortening product life cycle

– it is one of the major threat that Carbon Co2 is facing in Innovation & Entrepreneurship sector. It can lead to higher research and development costs, higher marketing expenses, lower customer loyalty, etc.

New competition

– After the dotcom bust of 2001, financial crisis of 2008-09, the business formation in US economy had declined. But in 2020 alone, there are more than 1.5 million new business applications in United States. This can lead to greater competition for Carbon Co2 in the Innovation & Entrepreneurship sector and impact the bottomline of the organization.

Environmental challenges

– Carbon Co2 needs to have a robust strategy against the disruptions arising from climate change and energy requirements. EU has identified it as key priority area and spending 30% of its 880 billion Euros European post Covid-19 recovery funds on green technology. Carbon Co2 can take advantage of this fund but it will also bring new competitors in the Innovation & Entrepreneurship industry.

Consumer confidence and its impact on Carbon Co2 demand

– There is a high probability of declining consumer confidence, given – high inflammation rate, rise of gig economy, lower job stability, increasing cost of living, higher interest rates, and aging demography. All the factors contribute to people saving higher rate of their income, resulting in lower consumer demand in the industry and other sectors.

Technology acceleration in Forth Industrial Revolution

– Carbon Co2 has witnessed rapid integration of technology during Covid-19 in the Innovation & Entrepreneurship industry. As one of the leading players in the industry, Carbon Co2 needs to keep up with the evolution of technology in the Innovation & Entrepreneurship sector. According to Mckinsey study top managers believe that the adoption of technology in operations, communications is 20-25 times faster than what they planned in the beginning of 2019.

Capital market disruption

– During the Covid-19, Dow Jones has touched record high. The valuations of a number of companies are way beyond their existing business model potential. This can lead to capital market correction which can put a number of suppliers, collaborators, value chain partners in great financial difficulty. It will directly impact the business of Carbon Co2.

Backlash against dominant players

– US Congress and other legislative arms of the government are getting tough on big business especially technology companies. The digital arm of Carbon Co2 business can come under increasing regulations regarding data privacy, data security, etc.




Weighted SWOT Analysis of Carbon Engineering Template, Example


Not all factors mentioned under the Strengths, Weakness, Opportunities, and Threats quadrants in the SWOT Analysis are equal. Managers in the HBR case study Carbon Engineering needs to zero down on the relative importance of each factor mentioned in the Strengths, Weakness, Opportunities, and Threats quadrants. We can provide the relative importance to each factor by assigning relative weights. Weighted SWOT analysis process is a three stage process –

First stage for doing weighted SWOT analysis of the case study Carbon Engineering is to rank the strengths and weaknesses of the organization. This will help you to assess the most important strengths and weaknesses of the firm and which one of the strengths and weaknesses mentioned in the initial lists are marginal and can be left out.

Second stage for conducting weighted SWOT analysis of the Harvard case study Carbon Engineering is to give probabilities to the external strategic factors thus better understanding the opportunities and threats arising out of macro environment changes and developments.

Third stage of constructing weighted SWOT analysis of Carbon Engineering is to provide strategic recommendations includes – joining likelihood of external strategic factors such as opportunities and threats to the internal strategic factors – strengths and weaknesses. You should start with external factors as they will provide the direction of the overall industry. Secondly by joining probabilities with internal strategic factors can help the company not only strategic fit but also the most probably strategic trade-off that Carbon Co2 needs to make to build a sustainable competitive advantage.



--- ---

Vistron Inc.: The Z Glass Project SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Roy D. Shapiro, Marco Iansiti , Technology & Operations


Note on the IT Services Industry SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

John D. Roberts, Gary Mekikian , Leadership & Managing People


Asda (B) SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Michael Beer, James Weber , Leadership & Managing People


Beijing Dream SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Arthur I Segel, Voon Siang Lee, Jialei Tian, Ying Laura Wang , Finance & Accounting


Bringing Silicon Valley to China: Linktone SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Donna Kelley, Hengyuan Zhu , Innovation & Entrepreneurship


Shimano and the High-End Road Bike Industry SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Garth Saloner, Victoria Chang , Strategy & Execution


General Scanning, Inc. (B) SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

H. Kent Bowen, Charles Tillen, Sean McClenaghan , Innovation & Entrepreneurship


Citibank's e-Business Strategy for Global Corporate Banking SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Julie Yu, Ali F. Farhoomand, Marissa McCauley, Shamza Khan , Strategy & Execution


H-Soft (B-2): Vikram Sharma SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Ramana Nanda , Innovation & Entrepreneurship