×




The Flaxil Label (B) SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis

Case Study SWOT Analysis Solution

Case Study Description of The Flaxil Label (B)


This case focuses on the 2001 negotiation between Mytex Pharmaceuticals and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The outcome of the negotiation would determine the new label for Mytex's blockbuster drug for arthritis, Flaxil. The negotiation is quite qualitative and differs from the typical price negotiation with which students are familiar. However, at stake was $500 million in Flaxil sales and the safety of millions of patients. The (B) case presents the perspectives of a patient and her doctor as they consider the new information about Flaxil's risk profile.

Authors :: Gregory Barron

Topics :: Leadership & Managing People

Tags :: International business, Negotiations, Psychology, Risk management, SWOT Analysis, SWOT Matrix, TOWS, Weighted SWOT Analysis

Swot Analysis of "The Flaxil Label (B)" written by Gregory Barron includes – strengths weakness that are internal strategic factors of the organization, and opportunities and threats that Flaxil Negotiation facing as an external strategic factors. Some of the topics covered in The Flaxil Label (B) case study are - Strategic Management Strategies, International business, Negotiations, Psychology, Risk management and Leadership & Managing People.


Some of the macro environment factors that can be used to understand the The Flaxil Label (B) casestudy better are - – talent flight as more people leaving formal jobs, banking and financial system is disrupted by Bitcoin and other crypto currencies, increasing energy prices, increasing inequality as vast percentage of new income is going to the top 1%, customer relationship management is fast transforming because of increasing concerns over data privacy, challanges to central banks by blockchain based private currencies, technology disruption, competitive advantages are harder to sustain because of technology dispersion, geopolitical disruptions, etc



12 Hrs

$59.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

24 Hrs

$49.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

48 Hrs

$39.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now







Introduction to SWOT Analysis of The Flaxil Label (B)


SWOT stands for an organization’s Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats . At Oak Spring University , we believe that protagonist in The Flaxil Label (B) case study can use SWOT analysis as a strategic management tool to assess the current internal strengths and weaknesses of the Flaxil Negotiation, and to figure out the opportunities and threats in the macro environment – technological, environmental, political, economic, social, demographic, etc in which Flaxil Negotiation operates in.

According to Harvard Business Review, 75% of the managers use SWOT analysis for various purposes such as – evaluating current scenario, strategic planning, new venture feasibility, personal growth goals, new market entry, Go To market strategies, portfolio management and strategic trade-off assessment, organizational restructuring, etc.




SWOT Objectives / Importance of SWOT Analysis and SWOT Matrix


SWOT analysis of The Flaxil Label (B) can be done for the following purposes –
1. Strategic planning using facts provided in The Flaxil Label (B) case study
2. Improving business portfolio management of Flaxil Negotiation
3. Assessing feasibility of the new initiative in Leadership & Managing People field.
4. Making a Leadership & Managing People topic specific business decision
5. Set goals for the organization
6. Organizational restructuring of Flaxil Negotiation




Strengths The Flaxil Label (B) | Internal Strategic Factors
What are Strengths in SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis

The strengths of Flaxil Negotiation in The Flaxil Label (B) Harvard Business Review case study are -

Innovation driven organization

– Flaxil Negotiation is one of the most innovative firm in sector. Manager in The Flaxil Label (B) Harvard Business Review case study can use Clayton Christensen Disruptive Innovation strategies to further increase the scale of innovtions in the organization.

Sustainable margins compare to other players in Leadership & Managing People industry

– The Flaxil Label (B) firm has clearly differentiated products in the market place. This has enabled Flaxil Negotiation to fetch slight price premium compare to the competitors in the Leadership & Managing People industry. The sustainable margins have also helped Flaxil Negotiation to invest into research and development (R&D) and innovation.

Organizational Resilience of Flaxil Negotiation

– The covid-19 pandemic has put organizational resilience at the centre of everthing that Flaxil Negotiation does. Organizational resilience comprises - Financial Resilience, Operational Resilience, Technological Resilience, Organizational Resilience, Business Model Resilience, and Reputation Resilience.

Ability to lead change in Leadership & Managing People field

– Flaxil Negotiation is one of the leading players in its industry. Over the years it has not only transformed the business landscape in its segment but also across the whole industry. The ability to lead change has enabled Flaxil Negotiation in – penetrating new markets, reaching out to new customers, and providing different value propositions to different customers in the international markets.

Highly skilled collaborators

– Flaxil Negotiation has highly efficient outsourcing and offshoring strategy. It has resulted in greater operational flexibility and bringing down the costs in highly price sensitive segment. Secondly the value chain collaborators of the firm in The Flaxil Label (B) HBR case study have helped the firm to develop new products and bring them quickly to the marketplace.

Effective Research and Development (R&D)

– Flaxil Negotiation has innovation driven culture where significant part of the revenues are spent on the research and development activities. This has resulted in, as mentioned in case study The Flaxil Label (B) - staying ahead in the industry in terms of – new product launches, superior customer experience, highly competitive pricing strategies, and great returns to the shareholders.

Analytics focus

– Flaxil Negotiation is putting a lot of focus on utilizing the power of analytics in business decision making. This has put it among the leading players in the industry. The technology infrastructure suggested by Gregory Barron can also help it to harness the power of analytics for – marketing optimization, demand forecasting, customer relationship management, inventory management, information sharing across the value chain etc.

Training and development

– Flaxil Negotiation has one of the best training and development program in the industry. The effectiveness of the training programs can be measured in The Flaxil Label (B) Harvard Business Review case study by analyzing – employees retention, in-house promotion, loyalty, new venture initiation, lack of conflict, and high level of both employees and customer engagement.

Diverse revenue streams

– Flaxil Negotiation is present in almost all the verticals within the industry. This has provided firm in The Flaxil Label (B) case study a diverse revenue stream that has helped it to survive disruptions such as global pandemic in Covid-19, financial disruption of 2008, and supply chain disruption of 2021.

Operational resilience

– The operational resilience strategy in the The Flaxil Label (B) Harvard Business Review case study comprises – understanding the underlying the factors in the industry, building diversified operations across different geographies so that disruption in one part of the world doesn’t impact the overall performance of the firm, and integrating the various business operations and processes through its digital transformation drive.

Low bargaining power of suppliers

– Suppliers of Flaxil Negotiation in the sector have low bargaining power. The Flaxil Label (B) has further diversified its suppliers portfolio by building a robust supply chain across various countries. This helps Flaxil Negotiation to manage not only supply disruptions but also source products at highly competitive prices.

High brand equity

– Flaxil Negotiation has strong brand awareness and brand recognition among both - the exiting customers and potential new customers. Strong brand equity has enabled Flaxil Negotiation to keep acquiring new customers and building profitable relationship with both the new and loyal customers.






Weaknesses The Flaxil Label (B) | Internal Strategic Factors
What are Weaknesses in SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis

The weaknesses of The Flaxil Label (B) are -

No frontier risks strategy

– After analyzing the HBR case study The Flaxil Label (B), it seems that company is thinking about the frontier risks that can impact Leadership & Managing People strategy. But it has very little resources allocation to manage the risks emerging from events such as natural disasters, climate change, melting of permafrost, tacking the rise of artificial intelligence, opportunities and threats emerging from commercialization of space etc.

Lack of clear differentiation of Flaxil Negotiation products

– To increase the profitability and margins on the products, Flaxil Negotiation needs to provide more differentiated products than what it is currently offering in the marketplace.

High operating costs

– Compare to the competitors, firm in the HBR case study The Flaxil Label (B) has high operating costs in the. This can be harder to sustain given the new emerging competition from nimble players who are using technology to attract Flaxil Negotiation 's lucrative customers.

Low market penetration in new markets

– Outside its home market of Flaxil Negotiation, firm in the HBR case study The Flaxil Label (B) needs to spend more promotional, marketing, and advertising efforts to penetrate international markets.

Slow to harness new channels of communication

– Even though competitors are using new communication channels such as Instagram, Tiktok, and Snap, Flaxil Negotiation is slow explore the new channels of communication. These new channels of communication mentioned in marketing section of case study The Flaxil Label (B) can help to provide better information regarding products and services. It can also build an online community to further reach out to potential customers.

Ability to respond to the competition

– As the decision making is very deliberative, highlighted in the case study The Flaxil Label (B), in the dynamic environment Flaxil Negotiation has struggled to respond to the nimble upstart competition. Flaxil Negotiation has reasonably good record with similar level competitors but it has struggled with new entrants taking away niches of its business.

Compensation and incentives

– The revenue per employee as mentioned in the HBR case study The Flaxil Label (B), is just above the industry average. Flaxil Negotiation needs to redesign the compensation structure and incentives to increase the revenue per employees. Some of the steps that it can take are – hiring more specialists on project basis, etc.

Capital Spending Reduction

– Even during the low interest decade, Flaxil Negotiation has not been able to do capital spending to the tune of the competition. This has resulted into fewer innovations and company facing stiff competition from both existing competitors and new entrants who are disrupting the industry using digital technology.

Interest costs

– Compare to the competition, Flaxil Negotiation has borrowed money from the capital market at higher rates. It needs to restructure the interest payment and costs so that it can compete better and improve profitability.

Need for greater diversity

– Flaxil Negotiation has taken concrete steps on diversity, equity, and inclusion. But the efforts so far has resulted in limited success. It needs to expand the recruitment and selection process to hire more people from the minorities and underprivileged background.

Workers concerns about automation

– As automation is fast increasing in the segment, Flaxil Negotiation needs to come up with a strategy to reduce the workers concern regarding automation. Without a clear strategy, it could lead to disruption and uncertainty within the organization.




Opportunities The Flaxil Label (B) | External Strategic Factors
What are Opportunities in the SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis


The opportunities highlighted in the Harvard Business Review case study The Flaxil Label (B) are -

Lowering marketing communication costs

– 5G expansion will open new opportunities for Flaxil Negotiation in the field of marketing communication. It will bring down the cost of doing business, provide technology platform to build new products in the Leadership & Managing People segment, and it will provide faster access to the consumers.

Identify volunteer opportunities

– Covid-19 has impacted working population in two ways – it has led to people soul searching about their professional choices, resulting in mass resignation. Secondly it has encouraged people to do things that they are passionate about. This has opened opportunities for businesses to build volunteer oriented socially driven projects. Flaxil Negotiation can explore opportunities that can attract volunteers and are consistent with its mission and vision.

Redefining models of collaboration and team work

– As explained in the weaknesses section, Flaxil Negotiation is facing challenges because of the dominance of functional experts in the organization. The Flaxil Label (B) case study suggests that firm can utilize new technology to build more coordinated teams and streamline operations and communications using tools such as CAD, Zoom, etc.

Loyalty marketing

– Flaxil Negotiation has focused on building a highly responsive customer relationship management platform. This platform is built on in-house data and driven by analytics and artificial intelligence. The customer analytics can help the organization to fine tune its loyalty marketing efforts, increase the wallet share of the organization, reduce wastage on mainstream advertising spending, build better pricing strategies using personalization, etc.

Buying journey improvements

– Flaxil Negotiation can improve the customer journey of consumers in the industry by using analytics and artificial intelligence. The Flaxil Label (B) suggest that firm can provide automated chats to help consumers solve their own problems, provide online suggestions to get maximum out of the products and services, and help consumers to build a community where they can interact with each other to develop new features and uses.

Changes in consumer behavior post Covid-19

– Consumer behavior has changed in the Leadership & Managing People industry because of Covid-19 restrictions. Some of this behavior will stay once things get back to normal. Flaxil Negotiation can take advantage of these changes in consumer behavior to build a far more efficient business model. For example consumer regular ordering of products can reduce both last mile delivery costs and market penetration costs. Flaxil Negotiation can further use this consumer data to build better customer loyalty, provide better products and service collection, and improve the value proposition in inflationary times.

Creating value in data economy

– The success of analytics program of Flaxil Negotiation has opened avenues for new revenue streams for the organization in the industry. This can help Flaxil Negotiation to build a more holistic ecosystem as suggested in the The Flaxil Label (B) case study. Flaxil Negotiation can build new products and services such as - data insight services, data privacy related products, data based consulting services, etc.

Reforming the budgeting process

- By establishing new metrics that will be used to evaluate both existing and potential projects Flaxil Negotiation can not only reduce the costs of the project but also help it in integrating the projects with other processes within the organization.

Developing new processes and practices

– Flaxil Negotiation can develop new processes and procedures in Leadership & Managing People industry using technology such as automation using artificial intelligence, real time transportation and products tracking, 3D modeling for concept development and new products pilot testing etc.

Better consumer reach

– The expansion of the 5G network will help Flaxil Negotiation to increase its market reach. Flaxil Negotiation will be able to reach out to new customers. Secondly 5G will also provide technology framework to build new tools and products that can help more immersive consumer experience and faster consumer journey.

Increase in government spending

– As the United States and other governments are increasing social spending and infrastructure spending to build economies post Covid-19, Flaxil Negotiation can use these opportunities to build new business models that can help the communities that Flaxil Negotiation operates in. Secondly it can use opportunities from government spending in Leadership & Managing People sector.

Manufacturing automation

– Flaxil Negotiation can use the latest technology developments to improve its manufacturing and designing process in Leadership & Managing People segment. It can use CAD and 3D printing to build a quick prototype and pilot testing products. It can leverage automation using machine learning and artificial intelligence to do faster production at lowers costs, and it can leverage the growth in satellite and tracking technologies to improve inventory management, transportation, and shipping.

Reconfiguring business model

– The expansion of digital payment system, the bringing down of international transactions costs using Bitcoin and other blockchain based currencies, etc can help Flaxil Negotiation to reconfigure its entire business model. For example it can used blockchain based technologies to reduce piracy of its products in the big markets such as China. Secondly it can use the popularity of e-commerce in various developing markets to build a Direct to Customer business model rather than the current Channel Heavy distribution network.




Threats The Flaxil Label (B) External Strategic Factors
What are Threats in the SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis


The threats mentioned in the HBR case study The Flaxil Label (B) are -

Technology acceleration in Forth Industrial Revolution

– Flaxil Negotiation has witnessed rapid integration of technology during Covid-19 in the Leadership & Managing People industry. As one of the leading players in the industry, Flaxil Negotiation needs to keep up with the evolution of technology in the Leadership & Managing People sector. According to Mckinsey study top managers believe that the adoption of technology in operations, communications is 20-25 times faster than what they planned in the beginning of 2019.

New competition

– After the dotcom bust of 2001, financial crisis of 2008-09, the business formation in US economy had declined. But in 2020 alone, there are more than 1.5 million new business applications in United States. This can lead to greater competition for Flaxil Negotiation in the Leadership & Managing People sector and impact the bottomline of the organization.

Regulatory challenges

– Flaxil Negotiation needs to prepare for regulatory challenges as consumer protection groups and other pressure groups are vigorously advocating for more regulations on big business - to reduce inequality, to create a level playing field, to product data privacy and consumer privacy, to reduce the influence of big money on democratic institutions, etc. This can lead to significant changes in the Leadership & Managing People industry regulations.

Stagnating economy with rate increase

– Flaxil Negotiation can face lack of demand in the market place because of Fed actions to reduce inflation. This can lead to sluggish growth in the economy, lower demands, lower investments, higher borrowing costs, and consolidation in the field.

High level of anxiety and lack of motivation

– the Great Resignation in United States is the sign of broader dissatisfaction among the workforce in United States. Flaxil Negotiation needs to understand the core reasons impacting the Leadership & Managing People industry. This will help it in building a better workplace.

Trade war between China and United States

– The trade war between two of the biggest economies can hugely impact the opportunities for Flaxil Negotiation in the Leadership & Managing People industry. The Leadership & Managing People industry is already at various protected from local competition in China, with the rise of trade war the protection levels may go up. This presents a clear threat of current business model in Chinese market.

Increasing wage structure of Flaxil Negotiation

– Post Covid-19 there is a sharp increase in the wages especially in the jobs that require interaction with people. The increasing wages can put downward pressure on the margins of Flaxil Negotiation.

Technology disruption because of hacks, piracy etc

– The colonial pipeline illustrated, how vulnerable modern organization are to international hackers, miscreants, and disruptors. The cyber security interruption, data leaks, etc can seriously jeopardize the future growth of the organization.

Easy access to finance

– Easy access to finance in Leadership & Managing People field will also reduce the barriers to entry in the industry, thus putting downward pressure on the prices because of increasing competition. Flaxil Negotiation can utilize it by borrowing at lower rates and invest it into research and development, capital expenditure to fortify its core competitive advantage.

Instability in the European markets

– European Union markets are facing three big challenges post Covid – expanded balance sheets, Brexit related business disruption, and aggressive Russia looking to distract the existing security mechanism. Flaxil Negotiation will face different problems in different parts of Europe. For example it will face inflationary pressures in UK, France, and Germany, balance sheet expansion and demand challenges in Southern European countries, and geopolitical instability in the Eastern Europe.

Backlash against dominant players

– US Congress and other legislative arms of the government are getting tough on big business especially technology companies. The digital arm of Flaxil Negotiation business can come under increasing regulations regarding data privacy, data security, etc.

Consumer confidence and its impact on Flaxil Negotiation demand

– There is a high probability of declining consumer confidence, given – high inflammation rate, rise of gig economy, lower job stability, increasing cost of living, higher interest rates, and aging demography. All the factors contribute to people saving higher rate of their income, resulting in lower consumer demand in the industry and other sectors.

Aging population

– As the populations of most advanced economies are aging, it will lead to high social security costs, higher savings among population, and lower demand for goods and services in the economy. The household savings in US, France, UK, Germany, and Japan are growing faster than predicted because of uncertainty caused by pandemic.




Weighted SWOT Analysis of The Flaxil Label (B) Template, Example


Not all factors mentioned under the Strengths, Weakness, Opportunities, and Threats quadrants in the SWOT Analysis are equal. Managers in the HBR case study The Flaxil Label (B) needs to zero down on the relative importance of each factor mentioned in the Strengths, Weakness, Opportunities, and Threats quadrants. We can provide the relative importance to each factor by assigning relative weights. Weighted SWOT analysis process is a three stage process –

First stage for doing weighted SWOT analysis of the case study The Flaxil Label (B) is to rank the strengths and weaknesses of the organization. This will help you to assess the most important strengths and weaknesses of the firm and which one of the strengths and weaknesses mentioned in the initial lists are marginal and can be left out.

Second stage for conducting weighted SWOT analysis of the Harvard case study The Flaxil Label (B) is to give probabilities to the external strategic factors thus better understanding the opportunities and threats arising out of macro environment changes and developments.

Third stage of constructing weighted SWOT analysis of The Flaxil Label (B) is to provide strategic recommendations includes – joining likelihood of external strategic factors such as opportunities and threats to the internal strategic factors – strengths and weaknesses. You should start with external factors as they will provide the direction of the overall industry. Secondly by joining probabilities with internal strategic factors can help the company not only strategic fit but also the most probably strategic trade-off that Flaxil Negotiation needs to make to build a sustainable competitive advantage.



--- ---

Tim Blanchard at Jones Mendel & Co. (Abridged) SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Jay W. Lorsch, John J. Gabarro , Leadership & Managing People


Western Drug Store Inc. SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Claude P. Lanfranconi , Innovation & Entrepreneurship


Malaysia: Capital and Control SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Rawi Abdelal, Laura Alfaro , Global Business


DoubleDutch SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Frank V. Cespedes, Matthew Preble , Innovation & Entrepreneurship


The World Bank in 2012: Choosing a Leader SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Lakshmi Iyer, Ian McKown Cornell , Leadership & Managing People


Cosmeticos de Espana, S.A. (A) SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

David F. Hawkins , Finance & Accounting


Samsung Electronics: Innovation and Design Strategy SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Ali Farhoomand, Vishwanath Desai , Innovation & Entrepreneurship


Strategic Planning at Sun Life SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Michael A. Roberto , Strategy & Execution


Deloitte and KPMG: The War for Talent SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Sanjeev Prashar, Amitabh Deo Kodwani, Mukesh Kumar , Organizational Development


Axel Springer in 2016: From Transformation to Acceleration? SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Robert A. Burgelman, Robert Siegel, Ryan Kissick , Global Business