×




Hostile Bid for Red October SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis

Case Study SWOT Analysis Solution

Case Study Description of Hostile Bid for Red October


Manatep Bank, a Russian investment bank, has just announced the country's first hostile tender offer for Red October, a confectionery company located in Moscow. As the chief financial officer of the target company, Yuri Yegorov must decide how to respond, how much his company is worth, and what to recommend to the board of directors. The context of the case, the nascent Russian financial system, raises a variety of interesting and complex valuation issues such as determining discount rates in countries with high inflation and unstable governments, uncertain property rights, and poor financial information. The absence of financial and institutional infrastructure provides a stark contrast to financial markets and takeovers in more developed countries.

Authors :: Benjamin C. Esty, Alan Bigman

Topics :: Finance & Accounting

Tags :: Emerging markets, Financial analysis, Financial management, Financial markets, Mergers & acquisitions, SWOT Analysis, SWOT Matrix, TOWS, Weighted SWOT Analysis

Swot Analysis of "Hostile Bid for Red October" written by Benjamin C. Esty, Alan Bigman includes – strengths weakness that are internal strategic factors of the organization, and opportunities and threats that Russian Hostile facing as an external strategic factors. Some of the topics covered in Hostile Bid for Red October case study are - Strategic Management Strategies, Emerging markets, Financial analysis, Financial management, Financial markets, Mergers & acquisitions and Finance & Accounting.


Some of the macro environment factors that can be used to understand the Hostile Bid for Red October casestudy better are - – talent flight as more people leaving formal jobs, geopolitical disruptions, there is backlash against globalization, cloud computing is disrupting traditional business models, wage bills are increasing, increasing government debt because of Covid-19 spendings, technology disruption, increasing household debt because of falling income levels, increasing inequality as vast percentage of new income is going to the top 1%, etc



12 Hrs

$59.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

24 Hrs

$49.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

48 Hrs

$39.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now







Introduction to SWOT Analysis of Hostile Bid for Red October


SWOT stands for an organization’s Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats . At Oak Spring University , we believe that protagonist in Hostile Bid for Red October case study can use SWOT analysis as a strategic management tool to assess the current internal strengths and weaknesses of the Russian Hostile, and to figure out the opportunities and threats in the macro environment – technological, environmental, political, economic, social, demographic, etc in which Russian Hostile operates in.

According to Harvard Business Review, 75% of the managers use SWOT analysis for various purposes such as – evaluating current scenario, strategic planning, new venture feasibility, personal growth goals, new market entry, Go To market strategies, portfolio management and strategic trade-off assessment, organizational restructuring, etc.




SWOT Objectives / Importance of SWOT Analysis and SWOT Matrix


SWOT analysis of Hostile Bid for Red October can be done for the following purposes –
1. Strategic planning using facts provided in Hostile Bid for Red October case study
2. Improving business portfolio management of Russian Hostile
3. Assessing feasibility of the new initiative in Finance & Accounting field.
4. Making a Finance & Accounting topic specific business decision
5. Set goals for the organization
6. Organizational restructuring of Russian Hostile




Strengths Hostile Bid for Red October | Internal Strategic Factors
What are Strengths in SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis

The strengths of Russian Hostile in Hostile Bid for Red October Harvard Business Review case study are -

Operational resilience

– The operational resilience strategy in the Hostile Bid for Red October Harvard Business Review case study comprises – understanding the underlying the factors in the industry, building diversified operations across different geographies so that disruption in one part of the world doesn’t impact the overall performance of the firm, and integrating the various business operations and processes through its digital transformation drive.

Training and development

– Russian Hostile has one of the best training and development program in the industry. The effectiveness of the training programs can be measured in Hostile Bid for Red October Harvard Business Review case study by analyzing – employees retention, in-house promotion, loyalty, new venture initiation, lack of conflict, and high level of both employees and customer engagement.

High brand equity

– Russian Hostile has strong brand awareness and brand recognition among both - the exiting customers and potential new customers. Strong brand equity has enabled Russian Hostile to keep acquiring new customers and building profitable relationship with both the new and loyal customers.

High switching costs

– The high switching costs that Russian Hostile has built up over years in its products and services combo offer has resulted in high retention of customers, lower marketing costs, and greater ability of the firm to focus on its customers.

Learning organization

- Russian Hostile is a learning organization. It has inculcated three key characters of learning organization in its processes and operations – exploration, creativity, and expansiveness. The work place at Russian Hostile is open place that encourages instructiveness, ideation, open minded discussions, and creativity. Employees and leaders in Hostile Bid for Red October Harvard Business Review case study emphasize – knowledge, initiative, and innovation.

Cross disciplinary teams

– Horizontal connected teams at the Russian Hostile are driving operational speed, building greater agility, and keeping the organization nimble to compete with new competitors. It helps are organization to ideate new ideas, and execute them swiftly in the marketplace.

Ability to recruit top talent

– Russian Hostile is one of the leading recruiters in the industry. Managers in the Hostile Bid for Red October are in a position to attract the best talent available. The firm has a robust talent identification program that helps in identifying the brightest.

Diverse revenue streams

– Russian Hostile is present in almost all the verticals within the industry. This has provided firm in Hostile Bid for Red October case study a diverse revenue stream that has helped it to survive disruptions such as global pandemic in Covid-19, financial disruption of 2008, and supply chain disruption of 2021.

Effective Research and Development (R&D)

– Russian Hostile has innovation driven culture where significant part of the revenues are spent on the research and development activities. This has resulted in, as mentioned in case study Hostile Bid for Red October - staying ahead in the industry in terms of – new product launches, superior customer experience, highly competitive pricing strategies, and great returns to the shareholders.

Analytics focus

– Russian Hostile is putting a lot of focus on utilizing the power of analytics in business decision making. This has put it among the leading players in the industry. The technology infrastructure suggested by Benjamin C. Esty, Alan Bigman can also help it to harness the power of analytics for – marketing optimization, demand forecasting, customer relationship management, inventory management, information sharing across the value chain etc.

Sustainable margins compare to other players in Finance & Accounting industry

– Hostile Bid for Red October firm has clearly differentiated products in the market place. This has enabled Russian Hostile to fetch slight price premium compare to the competitors in the Finance & Accounting industry. The sustainable margins have also helped Russian Hostile to invest into research and development (R&D) and innovation.

Low bargaining power of suppliers

– Suppliers of Russian Hostile in the sector have low bargaining power. Hostile Bid for Red October has further diversified its suppliers portfolio by building a robust supply chain across various countries. This helps Russian Hostile to manage not only supply disruptions but also source products at highly competitive prices.






Weaknesses Hostile Bid for Red October | Internal Strategic Factors
What are Weaknesses in SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis

The weaknesses of Hostile Bid for Red October are -

Low market penetration in new markets

– Outside its home market of Russian Hostile, firm in the HBR case study Hostile Bid for Red October needs to spend more promotional, marketing, and advertising efforts to penetrate international markets.

Aligning sales with marketing

– It come across in the case study Hostile Bid for Red October that the firm needs to have more collaboration between its sales team and marketing team. Sales professionals in the industry have deep experience in developing customer relationships. Marketing department in the case Hostile Bid for Red October can leverage the sales team experience to cultivate customer relationships as Russian Hostile is planning to shift buying processes online.

Compensation and incentives

– The revenue per employee as mentioned in the HBR case study Hostile Bid for Red October, is just above the industry average. Russian Hostile needs to redesign the compensation structure and incentives to increase the revenue per employees. Some of the steps that it can take are – hiring more specialists on project basis, etc.

Workers concerns about automation

– As automation is fast increasing in the segment, Russian Hostile needs to come up with a strategy to reduce the workers concern regarding automation. Without a clear strategy, it could lead to disruption and uncertainty within the organization.

Skills based hiring

– The stress on hiring functional specialists at Russian Hostile has created an environment where the organization is dominated by functional specialists rather than management generalist. This has resulted into product oriented approach rather than marketing oriented approach or consumers oriented approach.

Capital Spending Reduction

– Even during the low interest decade, Russian Hostile has not been able to do capital spending to the tune of the competition. This has resulted into fewer innovations and company facing stiff competition from both existing competitors and new entrants who are disrupting the industry using digital technology.

High dependence on existing supply chain

– The disruption in the global supply chains because of the Covid-19 pandemic and blockage of the Suez Canal illustrated the fragile nature of Russian Hostile supply chain. Even after few cautionary changes mentioned in the HBR case study - Hostile Bid for Red October, it is still heavily dependent upon the existing supply chain. The existing supply chain though brings in cost efficiencies but it has left Russian Hostile vulnerable to further global disruptions in South East Asia.

Slow decision making process

– As mentioned earlier in the report, Russian Hostile has a very deliberative decision making approach. This approach has resulted in prudent decisions, but it has also resulted in missing opportunities in the industry over the last five years. Russian Hostile even though has strong showing on digital transformation primary two stages, it has struggled to capitalize the power of digital transformation in marketing efforts and new venture efforts.

No frontier risks strategy

– After analyzing the HBR case study Hostile Bid for Red October, it seems that company is thinking about the frontier risks that can impact Finance & Accounting strategy. But it has very little resources allocation to manage the risks emerging from events such as natural disasters, climate change, melting of permafrost, tacking the rise of artificial intelligence, opportunities and threats emerging from commercialization of space etc.

Employees’ incomplete understanding of strategy

– From the instances in the HBR case study Hostile Bid for Red October, it seems that the employees of Russian Hostile don’t have comprehensive understanding of the firm’s strategy. This is reflected in number of promotional campaigns over the last few years that had mixed messaging and competing priorities. Some of the strategic activities and services promoted in the promotional campaigns were not consistent with the organization’s strategy.

Products dominated business model

– Even though Russian Hostile has some of the most successful products in the industry, this business model has made each new product launch extremely critical for continuous financial growth of the organization. firm in the HBR case study - Hostile Bid for Red October should strive to include more intangible value offerings along with its core products and services.




Opportunities Hostile Bid for Red October | External Strategic Factors
What are Opportunities in the SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis


The opportunities highlighted in the Harvard Business Review case study Hostile Bid for Red October are -

Leveraging digital technologies

– Russian Hostile can leverage digital technologies such as artificial intelligence and machine learning to automate the production process, customer analytics to get better insights into consumer behavior, realtime digital dashboards to get better sales tracking, logistics and transportation, product tracking, etc.

Low interest rates

– Even though inflation is raising its head in most developed economies, Russian Hostile can still utilize the low interest rates to borrow money for capital investment. Secondly it can also use the increase of government spending in infrastructure projects to get new business.

Using analytics as competitive advantage

– Russian Hostile has spent a significant amount of money and effort to integrate analytics and machine learning into its operations in the sector. This continuous investment in analytics has enabled, as illustrated in the Harvard case study Hostile Bid for Red October - to build a competitive advantage using analytics. The analytics driven competitive advantage can help Russian Hostile to build faster Go To Market strategies, better consumer insights, developing relevant product features, and building a highly efficient supply chain.

Remote work and new talent hiring opportunities

– The widespread usage of remote working technologies during Covid-19 has opened opportunities for Russian Hostile to expand its talent hiring zone. According to McKinsey Global Institute, 20% of the high end workforce in fields such as finance, information technology, can continously work from remote local post Covid-19. This presents a really great opportunity for Russian Hostile to hire the very best people irrespective of their geographical location.

Building a culture of innovation

– managers at Russian Hostile can make experimentation a productive activity and build a culture of innovation using approaches such as – mining transaction data, A/B testing of websites and selling platforms, engaging potential customers over various needs, and building on small ideas in the Finance & Accounting segment.

Manufacturing automation

– Russian Hostile can use the latest technology developments to improve its manufacturing and designing process in Finance & Accounting segment. It can use CAD and 3D printing to build a quick prototype and pilot testing products. It can leverage automation using machine learning and artificial intelligence to do faster production at lowers costs, and it can leverage the growth in satellite and tracking technologies to improve inventory management, transportation, and shipping.

Redefining models of collaboration and team work

– As explained in the weaknesses section, Russian Hostile is facing challenges because of the dominance of functional experts in the organization. Hostile Bid for Red October case study suggests that firm can utilize new technology to build more coordinated teams and streamline operations and communications using tools such as CAD, Zoom, etc.

Loyalty marketing

– Russian Hostile has focused on building a highly responsive customer relationship management platform. This platform is built on in-house data and driven by analytics and artificial intelligence. The customer analytics can help the organization to fine tune its loyalty marketing efforts, increase the wallet share of the organization, reduce wastage on mainstream advertising spending, build better pricing strategies using personalization, etc.

Harnessing reconfiguration of the global supply chains

– As the trade war between US and China heats up in the coming years, Russian Hostile can build a diversified supply chain model across various countries in - South East Asia, India, and other parts of the world. This reconfiguration of global supply chain can help, as suggested in case study, Hostile Bid for Red October, to buy more products closer to the markets, and it can leverage its size and influence to get better deal from the local markets.

Increase in government spending

– As the United States and other governments are increasing social spending and infrastructure spending to build economies post Covid-19, Russian Hostile can use these opportunities to build new business models that can help the communities that Russian Hostile operates in. Secondly it can use opportunities from government spending in Finance & Accounting sector.

Learning at scale

– Online learning technologies has now opened space for Russian Hostile to conduct training and development for its employees across the world. This will result in not only reducing the cost of training but also help employees in different part of the world to integrate with the headquarter work culture, ethos, and standards.

Buying journey improvements

– Russian Hostile can improve the customer journey of consumers in the industry by using analytics and artificial intelligence. Hostile Bid for Red October suggest that firm can provide automated chats to help consumers solve their own problems, provide online suggestions to get maximum out of the products and services, and help consumers to build a community where they can interact with each other to develop new features and uses.

Creating value in data economy

– The success of analytics program of Russian Hostile has opened avenues for new revenue streams for the organization in the industry. This can help Russian Hostile to build a more holistic ecosystem as suggested in the Hostile Bid for Red October case study. Russian Hostile can build new products and services such as - data insight services, data privacy related products, data based consulting services, etc.




Threats Hostile Bid for Red October External Strategic Factors
What are Threats in the SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis


The threats mentioned in the HBR case study Hostile Bid for Red October are -

Regulatory challenges

– Russian Hostile needs to prepare for regulatory challenges as consumer protection groups and other pressure groups are vigorously advocating for more regulations on big business - to reduce inequality, to create a level playing field, to product data privacy and consumer privacy, to reduce the influence of big money on democratic institutions, etc. This can lead to significant changes in the Finance & Accounting industry regulations.

Consumer confidence and its impact on Russian Hostile demand

– There is a high probability of declining consumer confidence, given – high inflammation rate, rise of gig economy, lower job stability, increasing cost of living, higher interest rates, and aging demography. All the factors contribute to people saving higher rate of their income, resulting in lower consumer demand in the industry and other sectors.

Aging population

– As the populations of most advanced economies are aging, it will lead to high social security costs, higher savings among population, and lower demand for goods and services in the economy. The household savings in US, France, UK, Germany, and Japan are growing faster than predicted because of uncertainty caused by pandemic.

Learning curve for new practices

– As the technology based on artificial intelligence and machine learning platform is getting complex, as highlighted in case study Hostile Bid for Red October, Russian Hostile may face longer learning curve for training and development of existing employees. This can open space for more nimble competitors in the field of Finance & Accounting .

Increasing wage structure of Russian Hostile

– Post Covid-19 there is a sharp increase in the wages especially in the jobs that require interaction with people. The increasing wages can put downward pressure on the margins of Russian Hostile.

Capital market disruption

– During the Covid-19, Dow Jones has touched record high. The valuations of a number of companies are way beyond their existing business model potential. This can lead to capital market correction which can put a number of suppliers, collaborators, value chain partners in great financial difficulty. It will directly impact the business of Russian Hostile.

Stagnating economy with rate increase

– Russian Hostile can face lack of demand in the market place because of Fed actions to reduce inflation. This can lead to sluggish growth in the economy, lower demands, lower investments, higher borrowing costs, and consolidation in the field.

High dependence on third party suppliers

– Russian Hostile high dependence on third party suppliers can disrupt its processes and delivery mechanism. For example -the current troubles of car makers because of chip shortage is because the chip companies started producing chips for electronic companies rather than car manufacturers.

Technology disruption because of hacks, piracy etc

– The colonial pipeline illustrated, how vulnerable modern organization are to international hackers, miscreants, and disruptors. The cyber security interruption, data leaks, etc can seriously jeopardize the future growth of the organization.

Trade war between China and United States

– The trade war between two of the biggest economies can hugely impact the opportunities for Russian Hostile in the Finance & Accounting industry. The Finance & Accounting industry is already at various protected from local competition in China, with the rise of trade war the protection levels may go up. This presents a clear threat of current business model in Chinese market.

Instability in the European markets

– European Union markets are facing three big challenges post Covid – expanded balance sheets, Brexit related business disruption, and aggressive Russia looking to distract the existing security mechanism. Russian Hostile will face different problems in different parts of Europe. For example it will face inflationary pressures in UK, France, and Germany, balance sheet expansion and demand challenges in Southern European countries, and geopolitical instability in the Eastern Europe.

Environmental challenges

– Russian Hostile needs to have a robust strategy against the disruptions arising from climate change and energy requirements. EU has identified it as key priority area and spending 30% of its 880 billion Euros European post Covid-19 recovery funds on green technology. Russian Hostile can take advantage of this fund but it will also bring new competitors in the Finance & Accounting industry.

Shortening product life cycle

– it is one of the major threat that Russian Hostile is facing in Finance & Accounting sector. It can lead to higher research and development costs, higher marketing expenses, lower customer loyalty, etc.




Weighted SWOT Analysis of Hostile Bid for Red October Template, Example


Not all factors mentioned under the Strengths, Weakness, Opportunities, and Threats quadrants in the SWOT Analysis are equal. Managers in the HBR case study Hostile Bid for Red October needs to zero down on the relative importance of each factor mentioned in the Strengths, Weakness, Opportunities, and Threats quadrants. We can provide the relative importance to each factor by assigning relative weights. Weighted SWOT analysis process is a three stage process –

First stage for doing weighted SWOT analysis of the case study Hostile Bid for Red October is to rank the strengths and weaknesses of the organization. This will help you to assess the most important strengths and weaknesses of the firm and which one of the strengths and weaknesses mentioned in the initial lists are marginal and can be left out.

Second stage for conducting weighted SWOT analysis of the Harvard case study Hostile Bid for Red October is to give probabilities to the external strategic factors thus better understanding the opportunities and threats arising out of macro environment changes and developments.

Third stage of constructing weighted SWOT analysis of Hostile Bid for Red October is to provide strategic recommendations includes – joining likelihood of external strategic factors such as opportunities and threats to the internal strategic factors – strengths and weaknesses. You should start with external factors as they will provide the direction of the overall industry. Secondly by joining probabilities with internal strategic factors can help the company not only strategic fit but also the most probably strategic trade-off that Russian Hostile needs to make to build a sustainable competitive advantage.



--- ---

Marketing at Bain & Co. SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Miklos Sarvary, Robert Pedrero , Sales & Marketing


Vic Young and Fishery Products International (A) SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

John Melnyk, Tami L. Hynes, W. Glenn Rowe , Leadership & Managing People


Student Plays Fantasy Hockey (B) SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Fredrik Odegaard, Chris Engelking, Linden Head, Matthew Rabson , Technology & Operations


Fortis Industries, Inc. (C), Spanish Version SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Rowland T. Moriarty Jr., Gordon Swartz , Sales & Marketing


Chiquita Brands International (B) SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Briana Huntsberger, Debora L. Spar , Global Business


Innovating in Health Care--Glossary SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Regina E. Herzlinger , Innovation & Entrepreneurship


The Beer Cases (D): Thai Bev SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Andrew Karl Delios, Donna Jimenez , Leadership & Managing People


Triangulate SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Thomas R. Eisenmann, Lauren Barley , Innovation & Entrepreneurship


Kaiser Steel Corp.--1987 SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Timothy A. Luehrman, William A. Teichner , Finance & Accounting


MindTree: A Community of Communities SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

David A. Garvin, Rachna Tahilyani , Leadership & Managing People


American Automobiles Limited: Production Planning SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Ajith J. Kumar, Soumitra Chakraborty, Ankit Dhaka , Technology & Operations