×




Lehman Brothers (C): Decline of the Equity Research Department SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis

Case Study SWOT Analysis Solution

Case Study Description of Lehman Brothers (C): Decline of the Equity Research Department


This case tracks the rapid decline of Lehman Brothers' equity research department from August 1992, when, beset by declining ranking, low morale, and high turnover, firm management decides to clean house and reinvest in building the department.

Authors :: Ashish Nanda, Boris Groysberg

Topics :: Leadership & Managing People

Tags :: Human resource management, Leadership, Strategy execution, SWOT Analysis, SWOT Matrix, TOWS, Weighted SWOT Analysis

Swot Analysis of "Lehman Brothers (C): Decline of the Equity Research Department" written by Ashish Nanda, Boris Groysberg includes – strengths weakness that are internal strategic factors of the organization, and opportunities and threats that Lehman Department facing as an external strategic factors. Some of the topics covered in Lehman Brothers (C): Decline of the Equity Research Department case study are - Strategic Management Strategies, Human resource management, Leadership, Strategy execution and Leadership & Managing People.


Some of the macro environment factors that can be used to understand the Lehman Brothers (C): Decline of the Equity Research Department casestudy better are - – increasing government debt because of Covid-19 spendings, increasing energy prices, customer relationship management is fast transforming because of increasing concerns over data privacy, banking and financial system is disrupted by Bitcoin and other crypto currencies, increasing transportation and logistics costs, increasing household debt because of falling income levels, challanges to central banks by blockchain based private currencies, there is backlash against globalization, there is increasing trade war between United States & China, etc



12 Hrs

$59.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

24 Hrs

$49.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

48 Hrs

$39.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now







Introduction to SWOT Analysis of Lehman Brothers (C): Decline of the Equity Research Department


SWOT stands for an organization’s Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats . At Oak Spring University , we believe that protagonist in Lehman Brothers (C): Decline of the Equity Research Department case study can use SWOT analysis as a strategic management tool to assess the current internal strengths and weaknesses of the Lehman Department, and to figure out the opportunities and threats in the macro environment – technological, environmental, political, economic, social, demographic, etc in which Lehman Department operates in.

According to Harvard Business Review, 75% of the managers use SWOT analysis for various purposes such as – evaluating current scenario, strategic planning, new venture feasibility, personal growth goals, new market entry, Go To market strategies, portfolio management and strategic trade-off assessment, organizational restructuring, etc.




SWOT Objectives / Importance of SWOT Analysis and SWOT Matrix


SWOT analysis of Lehman Brothers (C): Decline of the Equity Research Department can be done for the following purposes –
1. Strategic planning using facts provided in Lehman Brothers (C): Decline of the Equity Research Department case study
2. Improving business portfolio management of Lehman Department
3. Assessing feasibility of the new initiative in Leadership & Managing People field.
4. Making a Leadership & Managing People topic specific business decision
5. Set goals for the organization
6. Organizational restructuring of Lehman Department




Strengths Lehman Brothers (C): Decline of the Equity Research Department | Internal Strategic Factors
What are Strengths in SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis

The strengths of Lehman Department in Lehman Brothers (C): Decline of the Equity Research Department Harvard Business Review case study are -

Learning organization

- Lehman Department is a learning organization. It has inculcated three key characters of learning organization in its processes and operations – exploration, creativity, and expansiveness. The work place at Lehman Department is open place that encourages instructiveness, ideation, open minded discussions, and creativity. Employees and leaders in Lehman Brothers (C): Decline of the Equity Research Department Harvard Business Review case study emphasize – knowledge, initiative, and innovation.

Effective Research and Development (R&D)

– Lehman Department has innovation driven culture where significant part of the revenues are spent on the research and development activities. This has resulted in, as mentioned in case study Lehman Brothers (C): Decline of the Equity Research Department - staying ahead in the industry in terms of – new product launches, superior customer experience, highly competitive pricing strategies, and great returns to the shareholders.

Ability to lead change in Leadership & Managing People field

– Lehman Department is one of the leading players in its industry. Over the years it has not only transformed the business landscape in its segment but also across the whole industry. The ability to lead change has enabled Lehman Department in – penetrating new markets, reaching out to new customers, and providing different value propositions to different customers in the international markets.

Strong track record of project management

– Lehman Department is known for sticking to its project targets. This enables the firm to manage – time, project costs, and have sustainable margins on the projects.

Organizational Resilience of Lehman Department

– The covid-19 pandemic has put organizational resilience at the centre of everthing that Lehman Department does. Organizational resilience comprises - Financial Resilience, Operational Resilience, Technological Resilience, Organizational Resilience, Business Model Resilience, and Reputation Resilience.

Operational resilience

– The operational resilience strategy in the Lehman Brothers (C): Decline of the Equity Research Department Harvard Business Review case study comprises – understanding the underlying the factors in the industry, building diversified operations across different geographies so that disruption in one part of the world doesn’t impact the overall performance of the firm, and integrating the various business operations and processes through its digital transformation drive.

Superior customer experience

– The customer experience strategy of Lehman Department in the segment is based on four key concepts – personalization, simplification of complex needs, prompt response, and continuous engagement.

High switching costs

– The high switching costs that Lehman Department has built up over years in its products and services combo offer has resulted in high retention of customers, lower marketing costs, and greater ability of the firm to focus on its customers.

Sustainable margins compare to other players in Leadership & Managing People industry

– Lehman Brothers (C): Decline of the Equity Research Department firm has clearly differentiated products in the market place. This has enabled Lehman Department to fetch slight price premium compare to the competitors in the Leadership & Managing People industry. The sustainable margins have also helped Lehman Department to invest into research and development (R&D) and innovation.

Diverse revenue streams

– Lehman Department is present in almost all the verticals within the industry. This has provided firm in Lehman Brothers (C): Decline of the Equity Research Department case study a diverse revenue stream that has helped it to survive disruptions such as global pandemic in Covid-19, financial disruption of 2008, and supply chain disruption of 2021.

Successful track record of launching new products

– Lehman Department has launched numerous new products in last few years, keeping in mind evolving customer preferences and competitive pressures. Lehman Department has effective processes in place that helps in exploring new product needs, doing quick pilot testing, and then launching the products quickly using its extensive distribution network.

Highly skilled collaborators

– Lehman Department has highly efficient outsourcing and offshoring strategy. It has resulted in greater operational flexibility and bringing down the costs in highly price sensitive segment. Secondly the value chain collaborators of the firm in Lehman Brothers (C): Decline of the Equity Research Department HBR case study have helped the firm to develop new products and bring them quickly to the marketplace.






Weaknesses Lehman Brothers (C): Decline of the Equity Research Department | Internal Strategic Factors
What are Weaknesses in SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis

The weaknesses of Lehman Brothers (C): Decline of the Equity Research Department are -

Slow to harness new channels of communication

– Even though competitors are using new communication channels such as Instagram, Tiktok, and Snap, Lehman Department is slow explore the new channels of communication. These new channels of communication mentioned in marketing section of case study Lehman Brothers (C): Decline of the Equity Research Department can help to provide better information regarding products and services. It can also build an online community to further reach out to potential customers.

Compensation and incentives

– The revenue per employee as mentioned in the HBR case study Lehman Brothers (C): Decline of the Equity Research Department, is just above the industry average. Lehman Department needs to redesign the compensation structure and incentives to increase the revenue per employees. Some of the steps that it can take are – hiring more specialists on project basis, etc.

High operating costs

– Compare to the competitors, firm in the HBR case study Lehman Brothers (C): Decline of the Equity Research Department has high operating costs in the. This can be harder to sustain given the new emerging competition from nimble players who are using technology to attract Lehman Department 's lucrative customers.

No frontier risks strategy

– After analyzing the HBR case study Lehman Brothers (C): Decline of the Equity Research Department, it seems that company is thinking about the frontier risks that can impact Leadership & Managing People strategy. But it has very little resources allocation to manage the risks emerging from events such as natural disasters, climate change, melting of permafrost, tacking the rise of artificial intelligence, opportunities and threats emerging from commercialization of space etc.

Workers concerns about automation

– As automation is fast increasing in the segment, Lehman Department needs to come up with a strategy to reduce the workers concern regarding automation. Without a clear strategy, it could lead to disruption and uncertainty within the organization.

Slow to strategic competitive environment developments

– As Lehman Brothers (C): Decline of the Equity Research Department HBR case study mentions - Lehman Department takes time to assess the upcoming competitions. This has led to missing out on atleast 2-3 big opportunities in the industry in last five years.

Capital Spending Reduction

– Even during the low interest decade, Lehman Department has not been able to do capital spending to the tune of the competition. This has resulted into fewer innovations and company facing stiff competition from both existing competitors and new entrants who are disrupting the industry using digital technology.

High cash cycle compare to competitors

Lehman Department has a high cash cycle compare to other players in the industry. It needs to shorten the cash cycle by 12% to be more competitive in the marketplace, reduce inventory costs, and be more profitable.

Ability to respond to the competition

– As the decision making is very deliberative, highlighted in the case study Lehman Brothers (C): Decline of the Equity Research Department, in the dynamic environment Lehman Department has struggled to respond to the nimble upstart competition. Lehman Department has reasonably good record with similar level competitors but it has struggled with new entrants taking away niches of its business.

Employees’ incomplete understanding of strategy

– From the instances in the HBR case study Lehman Brothers (C): Decline of the Equity Research Department, it seems that the employees of Lehman Department don’t have comprehensive understanding of the firm’s strategy. This is reflected in number of promotional campaigns over the last few years that had mixed messaging and competing priorities. Some of the strategic activities and services promoted in the promotional campaigns were not consistent with the organization’s strategy.

Increasing silos among functional specialists

– The organizational structure of Lehman Department is dominated by functional specialists. It is not different from other players in the Leadership & Managing People segment. Lehman Department needs to de-silo the office environment to harness the true potential of its workforce. Secondly the de-silo will also help Lehman Department to focus more on services rather than just following the product oriented approach.




Opportunities Lehman Brothers (C): Decline of the Equity Research Department | External Strategic Factors
What are Opportunities in the SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis


The opportunities highlighted in the Harvard Business Review case study Lehman Brothers (C): Decline of the Equity Research Department are -

Better consumer reach

– The expansion of the 5G network will help Lehman Department to increase its market reach. Lehman Department will be able to reach out to new customers. Secondly 5G will also provide technology framework to build new tools and products that can help more immersive consumer experience and faster consumer journey.

Redefining models of collaboration and team work

– As explained in the weaknesses section, Lehman Department is facing challenges because of the dominance of functional experts in the organization. Lehman Brothers (C): Decline of the Equity Research Department case study suggests that firm can utilize new technology to build more coordinated teams and streamline operations and communications using tools such as CAD, Zoom, etc.

Reconfiguring business model

– The expansion of digital payment system, the bringing down of international transactions costs using Bitcoin and other blockchain based currencies, etc can help Lehman Department to reconfigure its entire business model. For example it can used blockchain based technologies to reduce piracy of its products in the big markets such as China. Secondly it can use the popularity of e-commerce in various developing markets to build a Direct to Customer business model rather than the current Channel Heavy distribution network.

Reforming the budgeting process

- By establishing new metrics that will be used to evaluate both existing and potential projects Lehman Department can not only reduce the costs of the project but also help it in integrating the projects with other processes within the organization.

Manufacturing automation

– Lehman Department can use the latest technology developments to improve its manufacturing and designing process in Leadership & Managing People segment. It can use CAD and 3D printing to build a quick prototype and pilot testing products. It can leverage automation using machine learning and artificial intelligence to do faster production at lowers costs, and it can leverage the growth in satellite and tracking technologies to improve inventory management, transportation, and shipping.

Loyalty marketing

– Lehman Department has focused on building a highly responsive customer relationship management platform. This platform is built on in-house data and driven by analytics and artificial intelligence. The customer analytics can help the organization to fine tune its loyalty marketing efforts, increase the wallet share of the organization, reduce wastage on mainstream advertising spending, build better pricing strategies using personalization, etc.

Increase in government spending

– As the United States and other governments are increasing social spending and infrastructure spending to build economies post Covid-19, Lehman Department can use these opportunities to build new business models that can help the communities that Lehman Department operates in. Secondly it can use opportunities from government spending in Leadership & Managing People sector.

Harnessing reconfiguration of the global supply chains

– As the trade war between US and China heats up in the coming years, Lehman Department can build a diversified supply chain model across various countries in - South East Asia, India, and other parts of the world. This reconfiguration of global supply chain can help, as suggested in case study, Lehman Brothers (C): Decline of the Equity Research Department, to buy more products closer to the markets, and it can leverage its size and influence to get better deal from the local markets.

Low interest rates

– Even though inflation is raising its head in most developed economies, Lehman Department can still utilize the low interest rates to borrow money for capital investment. Secondly it can also use the increase of government spending in infrastructure projects to get new business.

Using analytics as competitive advantage

– Lehman Department has spent a significant amount of money and effort to integrate analytics and machine learning into its operations in the sector. This continuous investment in analytics has enabled, as illustrated in the Harvard case study Lehman Brothers (C): Decline of the Equity Research Department - to build a competitive advantage using analytics. The analytics driven competitive advantage can help Lehman Department to build faster Go To Market strategies, better consumer insights, developing relevant product features, and building a highly efficient supply chain.

Leveraging digital technologies

– Lehman Department can leverage digital technologies such as artificial intelligence and machine learning to automate the production process, customer analytics to get better insights into consumer behavior, realtime digital dashboards to get better sales tracking, logistics and transportation, product tracking, etc.

Finding new ways to collaborate

– Covid-19 has not only transformed business models of companies in Leadership & Managing People industry, but it has also influenced the consumer preferences. Lehman Department can tie-up with other value chain partners to explore new opportunities regarding meeting customer demands and building a rewarding and engaging relationship.

Creating value in data economy

– The success of analytics program of Lehman Department has opened avenues for new revenue streams for the organization in the industry. This can help Lehman Department to build a more holistic ecosystem as suggested in the Lehman Brothers (C): Decline of the Equity Research Department case study. Lehman Department can build new products and services such as - data insight services, data privacy related products, data based consulting services, etc.




Threats Lehman Brothers (C): Decline of the Equity Research Department External Strategic Factors
What are Threats in the SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix / Weighted SWOT Analysis


The threats mentioned in the HBR case study Lehman Brothers (C): Decline of the Equity Research Department are -

Consumer confidence and its impact on Lehman Department demand

– There is a high probability of declining consumer confidence, given – high inflammation rate, rise of gig economy, lower job stability, increasing cost of living, higher interest rates, and aging demography. All the factors contribute to people saving higher rate of their income, resulting in lower consumer demand in the industry and other sectors.

High level of anxiety and lack of motivation

– the Great Resignation in United States is the sign of broader dissatisfaction among the workforce in United States. Lehman Department needs to understand the core reasons impacting the Leadership & Managing People industry. This will help it in building a better workplace.

High dependence on third party suppliers

– Lehman Department high dependence on third party suppliers can disrupt its processes and delivery mechanism. For example -the current troubles of car makers because of chip shortage is because the chip companies started producing chips for electronic companies rather than car manufacturers.

Trade war between China and United States

– The trade war between two of the biggest economies can hugely impact the opportunities for Lehman Department in the Leadership & Managing People industry. The Leadership & Managing People industry is already at various protected from local competition in China, with the rise of trade war the protection levels may go up. This presents a clear threat of current business model in Chinese market.

Increasing international competition and downward pressure on margins

– Apart from technology driven competitive advantage dilution, Lehman Department can face downward pressure on margins from increasing competition from international players. The international players have stable revenue in their home market and can use those resources to penetrate prominent markets illustrated in HBR case study Lehman Brothers (C): Decline of the Equity Research Department .

Easy access to finance

– Easy access to finance in Leadership & Managing People field will also reduce the barriers to entry in the industry, thus putting downward pressure on the prices because of increasing competition. Lehman Department can utilize it by borrowing at lower rates and invest it into research and development, capital expenditure to fortify its core competitive advantage.

New competition

– After the dotcom bust of 2001, financial crisis of 2008-09, the business formation in US economy had declined. But in 2020 alone, there are more than 1.5 million new business applications in United States. This can lead to greater competition for Lehman Department in the Leadership & Managing People sector and impact the bottomline of the organization.

Barriers of entry lowering

– As technology is more democratized, the barriers to entry in the industry are lowering. It can presents Lehman Department with greater competitive threats in the near to medium future. Secondly it will also put downward pressure on pricing throughout the sector.

Aging population

– As the populations of most advanced economies are aging, it will lead to high social security costs, higher savings among population, and lower demand for goods and services in the economy. The household savings in US, France, UK, Germany, and Japan are growing faster than predicted because of uncertainty caused by pandemic.

Capital market disruption

– During the Covid-19, Dow Jones has touched record high. The valuations of a number of companies are way beyond their existing business model potential. This can lead to capital market correction which can put a number of suppliers, collaborators, value chain partners in great financial difficulty. It will directly impact the business of Lehman Department.

Increasing wage structure of Lehman Department

– Post Covid-19 there is a sharp increase in the wages especially in the jobs that require interaction with people. The increasing wages can put downward pressure on the margins of Lehman Department.

Backlash against dominant players

– US Congress and other legislative arms of the government are getting tough on big business especially technology companies. The digital arm of Lehman Department business can come under increasing regulations regarding data privacy, data security, etc.

Regulatory challenges

– Lehman Department needs to prepare for regulatory challenges as consumer protection groups and other pressure groups are vigorously advocating for more regulations on big business - to reduce inequality, to create a level playing field, to product data privacy and consumer privacy, to reduce the influence of big money on democratic institutions, etc. This can lead to significant changes in the Leadership & Managing People industry regulations.




Weighted SWOT Analysis of Lehman Brothers (C): Decline of the Equity Research Department Template, Example


Not all factors mentioned under the Strengths, Weakness, Opportunities, and Threats quadrants in the SWOT Analysis are equal. Managers in the HBR case study Lehman Brothers (C): Decline of the Equity Research Department needs to zero down on the relative importance of each factor mentioned in the Strengths, Weakness, Opportunities, and Threats quadrants. We can provide the relative importance to each factor by assigning relative weights. Weighted SWOT analysis process is a three stage process –

First stage for doing weighted SWOT analysis of the case study Lehman Brothers (C): Decline of the Equity Research Department is to rank the strengths and weaknesses of the organization. This will help you to assess the most important strengths and weaknesses of the firm and which one of the strengths and weaknesses mentioned in the initial lists are marginal and can be left out.

Second stage for conducting weighted SWOT analysis of the Harvard case study Lehman Brothers (C): Decline of the Equity Research Department is to give probabilities to the external strategic factors thus better understanding the opportunities and threats arising out of macro environment changes and developments.

Third stage of constructing weighted SWOT analysis of Lehman Brothers (C): Decline of the Equity Research Department is to provide strategic recommendations includes – joining likelihood of external strategic factors such as opportunities and threats to the internal strategic factors – strengths and weaknesses. You should start with external factors as they will provide the direction of the overall industry. Secondly by joining probabilities with internal strategic factors can help the company not only strategic fit but also the most probably strategic trade-off that Lehman Department needs to make to build a sustainable competitive advantage.



--- ---

Orthoteks USA (D) SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Joseph L. Badaracco Jr., Richard G. Hamermesh , Strategy & Execution


Oaktree: Pierre Foods Investment SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Victoria Ivashina, Mike Harmon , Finance & Accounting


Columbia Capital Corp.: Summer 1998 SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

G. Felda Hardymon, Bill Wasik , Innovation & Entrepreneurship


Endeca Negotiation: Hardy Smith SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

G. Felda Hardymon, Josh Lerner, Ann Leamon , Innovation & Entrepreneurship


Channel Management SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Frank V. Cespedes , Sales & Marketing


Motorola and Japan (B) SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

David B. Yoffie, John J. Coleman, David Dobrowolski , Global Business


Richard Grasso and the NYSE, Inc. (B) SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

William W. George, Andrew N. McLean , Organizational Development


Merck Latin America (D): Mexico SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Michael Beer, James Weber , Organizational Development


George McClelland at KSR (B) SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Joshua D. Margolis, Ayesha Kanji , Leadership & Managing People


e-Consulting, Spanish Version SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Ashish Nanda, Thomas J. DeLong, Scot Landry, Thomas E. Agan , Technology & Operations


Pitney Bowes, Inc. SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Clayton M. Christensen, Howard Yu , Technology & Operations