×




James Cranfield Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for James Cranfield case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. James Cranfield case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by John J. Gabarro, Andrew Burtis. The James Cranfield (referred as “Cranfield Feelings” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Organizational Development. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Communication, Market research, Psychology.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of James Cranfield Case Study


Describes the attitudes, feelings, and perceptions of the manager who will conduct the performance appraisal interview. A rewritten version of an earlier case.


Case Authors : John J. Gabarro, Andrew Burtis

Topic : Organizational Development

Related Areas : Communication, Market research, Psychology




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for James Cranfield Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10013162) -10013162 - -
Year 1 3462988 -6550174 3462988 0.9434 3266970
Year 2 3973113 -2577061 7436101 0.89 3536056
Year 3 3943601 1366540 11379702 0.8396 3311123
Year 4 3249237 4615777 14628939 0.7921 2573700
TOTAL 14628939 12687850




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2674688

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Payback Period
3. Net Present Value
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Cranfield Feelings have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Cranfield Feelings shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of James Cranfield

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Organizational Development Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Cranfield Feelings often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Cranfield Feelings needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10013162) -10013162 - -
Year 1 3462988 -6550174 3462988 0.8696 3011294
Year 2 3973113 -2577061 7436101 0.7561 3004244
Year 3 3943601 1366540 11379702 0.6575 2592982
Year 4 3249237 4615777 14628939 0.5718 1857762
TOTAL 10466282


The Net NPV after 4 years is 453120

(10466282 - 10013162 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10013162) -10013162 - -
Year 1 3462988 -6550174 3462988 0.8333 2885823
Year 2 3973113 -2577061 7436101 0.6944 2759106
Year 3 3943601 1366540 11379702 0.5787 2282177
Year 4 3249237 4615777 14628939 0.4823 1566955
TOTAL 9494061


The Net NPV after 4 years is -519101

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9494061 - 10013162 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Cranfield Feelings to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Cranfield Feelings has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Cranfield Feelings can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Cranfield Feelings, then the stock price of the Cranfield Feelings should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Cranfield Feelings should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of James Cranfield

References & Further Readings

John J. Gabarro, Andrew Burtis (2018), "James Cranfield Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Madhucon Projects Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Softfront SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Huaneng Power SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Utilities , Electric Utilities


Metal Tiger SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Dialog SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Semiconductors


ENI ADR SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas Operations


Marr SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Retail (Grocery)


Europacorp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Motion Pictures


JAG SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Waste Management Services


Gadang SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services