×




Richard Debenham in Vienna (C): Between Velvet Divorce and the Sydney Olympics Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Richard Debenham in Vienna (C): Between Velvet Divorce and the Sydney Olympics case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Richard Debenham in Vienna (C): Between Velvet Divorce and the Sydney Olympics case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Sebastian Reiche. The Richard Debenham in Vienna (C): Between Velvet Divorce and the Sydney Olympics (referred as “Richard's Sydney” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Organizational Development. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Growth strategy, Personnel policies.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Richard Debenham in Vienna (C): Between Velvet Divorce and the Sydney Olympics Case Study


This is the third of a three-case series. Case (C) describes Richard's final years at the Sydney headquarters, leading to his official retirement in 2002 and three more years of part-time consultant work for the company. The case ends with Richard's reflections on his 31-year career in the company.


Case Authors : Sebastian Reiche

Topic : Organizational Development

Related Areas : Growth strategy, Personnel policies




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Richard Debenham in Vienna (C): Between Velvet Divorce and the Sydney Olympics Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10004215) -10004215 - -
Year 1 3466472 -6537743 3466472 0.9434 3270257
Year 2 3958677 -2579066 7425149 0.89 3523208
Year 3 3940634 1361568 11365783 0.8396 3308632
Year 4 3248747 4610315 14614530 0.7921 2573312
TOTAL 14614530 12675409




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2671194

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Net Present Value
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Richard's Sydney shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Richard's Sydney have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Richard Debenham in Vienna (C): Between Velvet Divorce and the Sydney Olympics

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Organizational Development Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Richard's Sydney often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Richard's Sydney needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10004215) -10004215 - -
Year 1 3466472 -6537743 3466472 0.8696 3014323
Year 2 3958677 -2579066 7425149 0.7561 2993329
Year 3 3940634 1361568 11365783 0.6575 2591031
Year 4 3248747 4610315 14614530 0.5718 1857482
TOTAL 10456164


The Net NPV after 4 years is 451949

(10456164 - 10004215 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10004215) -10004215 - -
Year 1 3466472 -6537743 3466472 0.8333 2888727
Year 2 3958677 -2579066 7425149 0.6944 2749081
Year 3 3940634 1361568 11365783 0.5787 2280459
Year 4 3248747 4610315 14614530 0.4823 1566718
TOTAL 9484986


The Net NPV after 4 years is -519229

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9484986 - 10004215 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Richard's Sydney to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Richard's Sydney has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Richard's Sydney can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Richard's Sydney, then the stock price of the Richard's Sydney should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Richard's Sydney should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Richard Debenham in Vienna (C): Between Velvet Divorce and the Sydney Olympics

References & Further Readings

Sebastian Reiche (2018), "Richard Debenham in Vienna (C): Between Velvet Divorce and the Sydney Olympics Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Vinda Int Holdings SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Personal & Household Prods.


Leaf Group SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Services


Sports Venues of Florida SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Japan Power Fastening SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Misc. Fabricated Products


Unity Investments SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Toyo Sugar Refining SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Sz Coship Elect A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Communications Equipment