×




Korea Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Korea case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Korea case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Forest Reinhardt, Jonathan Schlefer, Keith Chi-ho Wong, Mayuka Yamazaki. The Korea (referred as “Authoritarianism Chaebols” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Organizational Development. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Demographics, Economics, Globalization, Government, Leadership.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Korea Case Study


South Korea's economic success and its transition from authoritarianism to democracy teach important lessons in national strategy and political economy. Now, though, its famous chaebols may need reform, the population is aging, and relations with the North are as tense as ever. What should the country's leaders do?


Case Authors : Forest Reinhardt, Jonathan Schlefer, Keith Chi-ho Wong, Mayuka Yamazaki

Topic : Organizational Development

Related Areas : Demographics, Economics, Globalization, Government, Leadership




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Korea Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10003792) -10003792 - -
Year 1 3467307 -6536485 3467307 0.9434 3271044
Year 2 3982618 -2553867 7449925 0.89 3544516
Year 3 3969519 1415652 11419444 0.8396 3332885
Year 4 3234667 4650319 14654111 0.7921 2562159
TOTAL 14654111 12710604




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2706812

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Profitability Index
3. Payback Period
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Authoritarianism Chaebols shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Authoritarianism Chaebols have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Korea

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Organizational Development Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Authoritarianism Chaebols often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Authoritarianism Chaebols needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10003792) -10003792 - -
Year 1 3467307 -6536485 3467307 0.8696 3015050
Year 2 3982618 -2553867 7449925 0.7561 3011431
Year 3 3969519 1415652 11419444 0.6575 2610023
Year 4 3234667 4650319 14654111 0.5718 1849431
TOTAL 10485935


The Net NPV after 4 years is 482143

(10485935 - 10003792 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10003792) -10003792 - -
Year 1 3467307 -6536485 3467307 0.8333 2889423
Year 2 3982618 -2553867 7449925 0.6944 2765707
Year 3 3969519 1415652 11419444 0.5787 2297175
Year 4 3234667 4650319 14654111 0.4823 1559928
TOTAL 9512233


The Net NPV after 4 years is -491559

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9512233 - 10003792 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Authoritarianism Chaebols to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Authoritarianism Chaebols has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Authoritarianism Chaebols can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Authoritarianism Chaebols, then the stock price of the Authoritarianism Chaebols should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Authoritarianism Chaebols should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Korea

References & Further Readings

Forest Reinhardt, Jonathan Schlefer, Keith Chi-ho Wong, Mayuka Yamazaki (2018), "Korea Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Indus Holding AG SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts


Integrated Diagnostics SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Healthcare Facilities


Leonardo SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Aerospace & Defense


Stanley Electric Co Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts


Allied Motion SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Global Self Storage SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Transportation , Misc. Transportation


Gazit Globe SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


RPM SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. - Supplies & Fixtures