×




GE's Imagination Breakthroughs: The Evo Project, Spanish Version Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for GE's Imagination Breakthroughs: The Evo Project, Spanish Version case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. GE's Imagination Breakthroughs: The Evo Project, Spanish Version case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Christopher A. Bartlett, Brian J. Hall, Nicole Bennett. The GE's Imagination Breakthroughs: The Evo Project, Spanish Version (referred as “Locomotive Ge” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Organizational Development. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Growth strategy, Innovation, International business, Leadership development, Marketing, Risk management.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of GE's Imagination Breakthroughs: The Evo Project, Spanish Version Case Study


In September 2003, Jeff Immelt challenged the business leaders at GE to come up with "Imagination Breakthroughs," innovative new projects that would serve as the centerpiece of GE's organic growth initiative. Follows the company as these changes are driven through the business units, focusing on GE Transportation as it launches a series of groundbreaking, green products--from the Evolution Locomotive to the Hybrid Locomotive. The growth process transforms the culture within GE Transportation, leading to a redefinition of the marketing role, the implementation of a "growth leader" profile and new decision-making processes to encourage innovation and risk. Finally, presents a critical decision point, as Transportation executives must decide whether or not to support the high-risk Hybrid Locomotive project.


Case Authors : Christopher A. Bartlett, Brian J. Hall, Nicole Bennett

Topic : Organizational Development

Related Areas : Growth strategy, Innovation, International business, Leadership development, Marketing, Risk management




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for GE's Imagination Breakthroughs: The Evo Project, Spanish Version Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10001709) -10001709 - -
Year 1 3470834 -6530875 3470834 0.9434 3274372
Year 2 3975564 -2555311 7446398 0.89 3538238
Year 3 3963733 1408422 11410131 0.8396 3328027
Year 4 3232743 4641165 14642874 0.7921 2560635
TOTAL 14642874 12701271




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2699562

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Profitability Index
3. Payback Period
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Locomotive Ge have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Locomotive Ge shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of GE's Imagination Breakthroughs: The Evo Project, Spanish Version

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Organizational Development Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Locomotive Ge often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Locomotive Ge needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10001709) -10001709 - -
Year 1 3470834 -6530875 3470834 0.8696 3018117
Year 2 3975564 -2555311 7446398 0.7561 3006098
Year 3 3963733 1408422 11410131 0.6575 2606219
Year 4 3232743 4641165 14642874 0.5718 1848331
TOTAL 10478764


The Net NPV after 4 years is 477055

(10478764 - 10001709 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10001709) -10001709 - -
Year 1 3470834 -6530875 3470834 0.8333 2892362
Year 2 3975564 -2555311 7446398 0.6944 2760808
Year 3 3963733 1408422 11410131 0.5787 2293827
Year 4 3232743 4641165 14642874 0.4823 1559000
TOTAL 9505997


The Net NPV after 4 years is -495712

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9505997 - 10001709 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Locomotive Ge to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Locomotive Ge has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Locomotive Ge can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Locomotive Ge, then the stock price of the Locomotive Ge should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Locomotive Ge should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of GE's Imagination Breakthroughs: The Evo Project, Spanish Version

References & Further Readings

Christopher A. Bartlett, Brian J. Hall, Nicole Bennett (2018), "GE's Imagination Breakthroughs: The Evo Project, Spanish Version Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Amcorp Properties SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Hiru Corporation SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Allianz ADR SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Insurance (Life)


OFS Capital Corp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Steinhoff Int SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Retail (Specialty)


Fannie Mae 5.375 I SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Consumer Financial Services


Shanghai Dragon SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Apparel/Accessories