×




Raise Your Glasses - The Water's Magic! Strategic IT At SA Water: A Case Study In Alignment, Outsourcing and Governance Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Raise Your Glasses - The Water's Magic! Strategic IT At SA Water: A Case Study In Alignment, Outsourcing and Governance case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Raise Your Glasses - The Water's Magic! Strategic IT At SA Water: A Case Study In Alignment, Outsourcing and Governance case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Alan Thorogood, Phillip Yetton, Anthony Vlasic, Joan Spiller. The Raise Your Glasses - The Water's Magic! Strategic IT At SA Water: A Case Study In Alignment, Outsourcing and Governance (referred as “Water Cio” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Project management, Strategy.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Raise Your Glasses - The Water's Magic! Strategic IT At SA Water: A Case Study In Alignment, Outsourcing and Governance Case Study


The South Australian Water case study illustrates the management challenges in aligning Information Technology with business objectives in a publicly owned corporation. To achieve the alignment, the new CIO begins by refreshing the IT infrastructure to support the required business applications. When the Government establishes 'Improved water quality' as a major corporate goal, the CIO seeks to add value to the business by developing a quality reporting system that leverages the existing technology. At the same time, he demonstrates to the corporation the IT function's capability to deliver business value through the management of multiple outsourcing vendors.


Case Authors : Alan Thorogood, Phillip Yetton, Anthony Vlasic, Joan Spiller

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : Project management, Strategy




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Raise Your Glasses - The Water's Magic! Strategic IT At SA Water: A Case Study In Alignment, Outsourcing and Governance Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10013885) -10013885 - -
Year 1 3445056 -6568829 3445056 0.9434 3250053
Year 2 3966892 -2601937 7411948 0.89 3530520
Year 3 3968573 1366636 11380521 0.8396 3332090
Year 4 3223697 4590333 14604218 0.7921 2553470
TOTAL 14604218 12666133




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2652248

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Payback Period
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Water Cio have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Water Cio shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Raise Your Glasses - The Water's Magic! Strategic IT At SA Water: A Case Study In Alignment, Outsourcing and Governance

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Water Cio often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Water Cio needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10013885) -10013885 - -
Year 1 3445056 -6568829 3445056 0.8696 2995701
Year 2 3966892 -2601937 7411948 0.7561 2999540
Year 3 3968573 1366636 11380521 0.6575 2609401
Year 4 3223697 4590333 14604218 0.5718 1843159
TOTAL 10447802


The Net NPV after 4 years is 433917

(10447802 - 10013885 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10013885) -10013885 - -
Year 1 3445056 -6568829 3445056 0.8333 2870880
Year 2 3966892 -2601937 7411948 0.6944 2754786
Year 3 3968573 1366636 11380521 0.5787 2296628
Year 4 3223697 4590333 14604218 0.4823 1554638
TOTAL 9476932


The Net NPV after 4 years is -536953

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9476932 - 10013885 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Water Cio to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Water Cio has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Water Cio can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Water Cio, then the stock price of the Water Cio should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Water Cio should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Raise Your Glasses - The Water's Magic! Strategic IT At SA Water: A Case Study In Alignment, Outsourcing and Governance

References & Further Readings

Alan Thorogood, Phillip Yetton, Anthony Vlasic, Joan Spiller (2018), "Raise Your Glasses - The Water's Magic! Strategic IT At SA Water: A Case Study In Alignment, Outsourcing and Governance Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Hosoda SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Essendant Inc SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Office Supplies


ShenZhen Yitoa Intelligent Control SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Scientific & Technical Instr.


Nordson SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


CKP Products SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Alvogen Korea SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Ferro SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Eidos Therapeutics SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs