×




Water Crisis in India Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Water Crisis in India case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Water Crisis in India case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Gary Clendenen, James F. Booker, Michael A. Card, Raj Devasagayam. The Water Crisis in India (referred as “Water India” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Decision making, Sustainability.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Water Crisis in India Case Study


India had long suffered floods during the monsoons, droughts during the dry seasons, and periodic death causing famines during multi-year droughts. The old canal-based irrigation system developed by the British had crumbled from neglect and wealthier famers had turned to wells. Water shortages were compounded by the rapid population growth in India and water pollution. Dinesh Shindey had been asked by the prime minister to chair a task force to study the social, environmental, technical, and economic aspects of the proposed River Linking Project. It was a massive federal government project that required the construction of 34 new dams, 94 tunnels, and 12,500 kilometers of new canals. Proponents believed it would greatly increase the supply of water, but opponents believed it would never work as designed. Many simply believed that it was impossible to complete such a massive project in corruption plagued India. A former Secretary of the Ministry of Water Resources of India named S. Kannan believed that the solution to the water crisis in India lay instead in a decentralized approach based on conservation, the completion of numerous small, decentralized regional and local projects, and in managing the demand for water. After meeting with S. Kannan, Shindey's task force would write their recommendations in a report that would become a basis for how India would respond. This case presents a complex multicriteria decision problem that requires students to examine the relevant political, economic, cultural, environmental, and legal aspects as related to a wide-ranging mix of stakeholders. Students can assign probabilities and do a decision tree analysis before looking at the situation through the rational, incremental, and garbage can models of decision making. The case illustrates both how carefully humans need to manage natural resources in the face of rapidly growing demand and also how incredibly complex it is to manage such resources in a democratic system.


Case Authors : Gary Clendenen, James F. Booker, Michael A. Card, Raj Devasagayam

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : Decision making, Sustainability




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Water Crisis in India Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10018486) -10018486 - -
Year 1 3469016 -6549470 3469016 0.9434 3272657
Year 2 3959025 -2590445 7428041 0.89 3523518
Year 3 3939953 1349508 11367994 0.8396 3308061
Year 4 3227168 4576676 14595162 0.7921 2556219
TOTAL 14595162 12660455




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2641969

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Profitability Index
3. Net Present Value
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Water India shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Water India have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Water Crisis in India

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Water India often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Water India needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10018486) -10018486 - -
Year 1 3469016 -6549470 3469016 0.8696 3016536
Year 2 3959025 -2590445 7428041 0.7561 2993592
Year 3 3939953 1349508 11367994 0.6575 2590583
Year 4 3227168 4576676 14595162 0.5718 1845144
TOTAL 10445854


The Net NPV after 4 years is 427368

(10445854 - 10018486 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10018486) -10018486 - -
Year 1 3469016 -6549470 3469016 0.8333 2890847
Year 2 3959025 -2590445 7428041 0.6944 2749323
Year 3 3939953 1349508 11367994 0.5787 2280065
Year 4 3227168 4576676 14595162 0.4823 1556312
TOTAL 9476547


The Net NPV after 4 years is -541939

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9476547 - 10018486 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Water India to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Water India has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Water India can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Water India, then the stock price of the Water India should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Water India should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Water Crisis in India

References & Further Readings

Gary Clendenen, James F. Booker, Michael A. Card, Raj Devasagayam (2018), "Water Crisis in India Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Brimstone Invest N SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Fish/Livestock


Dynam Japan SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Casinos & Gaming


Flexiintl Sftware Inc SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


AudioEye SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Audio & Video Equipment


Taldor SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Taiko Pharmaceutical SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


BIG SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Rental & Leasing


JFE Systems SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Networks


Pharmos Corp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Credit Suisse SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services