×




PARKER - GIBSON - Confidential Instructions for the Parkers Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for PARKER - GIBSON - Confidential Instructions for the Parkers case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. PARKER - GIBSON - Confidential Instructions for the Parkers case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Program on Negotiation. The PARKER - GIBSON - Confidential Instructions for the Parkers (referred as “Parkers Lot” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Negotiations.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of PARKER - GIBSON - Confidential Instructions for the Parkers Case Study


Accompanied by product #PON386.Two-party, single-issue negotiation between two neighbors regarding the potential sale of a vacant lot. The Parkers and the Gibsons own homes on adjacent plots of land. The homes are separated by a 1/2 lot the Parkers purchased years ago in hopes of building a tennis court, which they never got around to. The Parkers are now moving out of state and are interested in selling the half lot, as the buyer of their home is not interested in it. The Parkers have approached the Gibsons (who have interest in the lot for home improvements they have planned) about purchasing the lot. Neither party knows much about the other's interests. The Parkers and Gibsons are meeting to explore whether a mutually beneficial transaction is possible. This is a role play case.


Case Authors : Program on Negotiation

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : Negotiations




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for PARKER - GIBSON - Confidential Instructions for the Parkers Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10001309) -10001309 - -
Year 1 3453739 -6547570 3453739 0.9434 3258244
Year 2 3960131 -2587439 7413870 0.89 3524502
Year 3 3973483 1386044 11387353 0.8396 3336213
Year 4 3238973 4625017 14626326 0.7921 2565570
TOTAL 14626326 12684530




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2683221

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Profitability Index
3. Payback Period
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Parkers Lot have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Parkers Lot shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of PARKER - GIBSON - Confidential Instructions for the Parkers

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Parkers Lot often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Parkers Lot needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10001309) -10001309 - -
Year 1 3453739 -6547570 3453739 0.8696 3003251
Year 2 3960131 -2587439 7413870 0.7561 2994428
Year 3 3973483 1386044 11387353 0.6575 2612630
Year 4 3238973 4625017 14626326 0.5718 1851893
TOTAL 10462202


The Net NPV after 4 years is 460893

(10462202 - 10001309 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10001309) -10001309 - -
Year 1 3453739 -6547570 3453739 0.8333 2878116
Year 2 3960131 -2587439 7413870 0.6944 2750091
Year 3 3973483 1386044 11387353 0.5787 2299469
Year 4 3238973 4625017 14626326 0.4823 1562005
TOTAL 9489681


The Net NPV after 4 years is -511628

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9489681 - 10001309 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Parkers Lot to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Parkers Lot has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Parkers Lot can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Parkers Lot, then the stock price of the Parkers Lot should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Parkers Lot should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of PARKER - GIBSON - Confidential Instructions for the Parkers

References & Further Readings

Program on Negotiation (2018), "PARKER - GIBSON - Confidential Instructions for the Parkers Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


T Gaia Corp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Retail (Technology)


Renaissance Jewellery Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Jewelry & Silverware


Iida Group Holdings Co Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Flexion Theraptc SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Spigen Korea SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


SonoScape Medical SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Medical Equipment & Supplies


Grand Field SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


Alliance Pharma SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


A-One Seimitsu SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods