×




DuPont Tyvek(R): Commercializing a Disruptive Innovation Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for DuPont Tyvek(R): Commercializing a Disruptive Innovation case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. DuPont Tyvek(R): Commercializing a Disruptive Innovation case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Mark Jeffery, Robert Cooper, Scott Buchanan. The DuPont Tyvek(R): Commercializing a Disruptive Innovation (referred as “Tyvek Dupont's” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Product development, Sales, Strategy.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of DuPont Tyvek(R): Commercializing a Disruptive Innovation Case Study


What happens when a company is faced with a unique market challenge with the potential to change the way business is done--a true market disruption? This was the challenge faced by the European business team of DuPont's Tyvek Housewrap business. The adoption of the Kyoto Protocol created new challenges for the construction industry in the United Kingdom that the DuPont team felt it could meet. To enforce the Kyoto Protocol, the U.K. government threatened to fine utility companies and builders who did not adhere to new emissions standards. Deploys the Innovation Radar framework, which encourages a business to think through all the issues of a business system, leading to a successful introduction and a sustainable business. DuPont's European Tyvek team had to devise a solution at the intersection of multiple elements. Specifically: Who should it target? How should it describe the product's value proposition? Through what channels could it reach the key decision makers? How could it overcome the inertia of the existing business system?


Case Authors : Mark Jeffery, Robert Cooper, Scott Buchanan

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : Product development, Sales, Strategy




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for DuPont Tyvek(R): Commercializing a Disruptive Innovation Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10001638) -10001638 - -
Year 1 3470078 -6531560 3470078 0.9434 3273658
Year 2 3969581 -2561979 7439659 0.89 3532913
Year 3 3970539 1408560 11410198 0.8396 3333741
Year 4 3251343 4659903 14661541 0.7921 2575368
TOTAL 14661541 12715681




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2714043

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Net Present Value
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Tyvek Dupont's have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Tyvek Dupont's shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of DuPont Tyvek(R): Commercializing a Disruptive Innovation

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Tyvek Dupont's often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Tyvek Dupont's needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10001638) -10001638 - -
Year 1 3470078 -6531560 3470078 0.8696 3017459
Year 2 3969581 -2561979 7439659 0.7561 3001574
Year 3 3970539 1408560 11410198 0.6575 2610694
Year 4 3251343 4659903 14661541 0.5718 1858966
TOTAL 10488692


The Net NPV after 4 years is 487054

(10488692 - 10001638 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10001638) -10001638 - -
Year 1 3470078 -6531560 3470078 0.8333 2891732
Year 2 3969581 -2561979 7439659 0.6944 2756653
Year 3 3970539 1408560 11410198 0.5787 2297766
Year 4 3251343 4659903 14661541 0.4823 1567970
TOTAL 9514121


The Net NPV after 4 years is -487517

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9514121 - 10001638 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Tyvek Dupont's to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Tyvek Dupont's has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Tyvek Dupont's can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Tyvek Dupont's, then the stock price of the Tyvek Dupont's should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Tyvek Dupont's should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of DuPont Tyvek(R): Commercializing a Disruptive Innovation

References & Further Readings

Mark Jeffery, Robert Cooper, Scott Buchanan (2018), "DuPont Tyvek(R): Commercializing a Disruptive Innovation Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Elec-Tech Int A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Appliance & Tool


Jiangxi Fushine Pharma SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Heritage Foods SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Fish/Livestock


Exponent SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Business Services


State Energy SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Apparel/Accessories


Atlas Copco B SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


Pinnacle Renewable SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Fenghua Adv A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Novatek DRC SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas - Integrated