Orthoteks USA (A) Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Orthoteks USA (A) case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Orthoteks USA (A) case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Joseph L. Badaracco Jr., Richard G. Hamermesh. The Orthoteks USA (A) (referred as “Orthoteks Usa” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, International business, Negotiations, Strategy execution.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

Case Description of Orthoteks USA (A) Case Study

A series on implementing strategy as the head of the U.S. subsidiary of a successful Swiss medical products firm. Traces the actions of the CEO over a four year period and highlights his negotiations with the Swiss parent and the way functional components of the strategy were developed and integrated. Describes Hans Wyss' first eight months as CEO of Orthoteks USA.

Case Authors : Joseph L. Badaracco Jr., Richard G. Hamermesh

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : International business, Negotiations, Strategy execution

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Orthoteks USA (A) Case Study

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10025290) -10025290 - -
Year 1 3452086 -6573204 3452086 0.9434 3256685
Year 2 3969089 -2604115 7421175 0.89 3532475
Year 3 3948328 1344213 11369503 0.8396 3315092
Year 4 3247189 4591402 14616692 0.7921 2572078
TOTAL 14616692 12676330

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2651040

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Profitability Index
3. Net Present Value
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Orthoteks Usa shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Orthoteks Usa have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Orthoteks USA (A)

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Orthoteks Usa often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Orthoteks Usa needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10025290) -10025290 - -
Year 1 3452086 -6573204 3452086 0.8696 3001814
Year 2 3969089 -2604115 7421175 0.7561 3001202
Year 3 3948328 1344213 11369503 0.6575 2596090
Year 4 3247189 4591402 14616692 0.5718 1856591
TOTAL 10455696

The Net NPV after 4 years is 430406

(10455696 - 10025290 )

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10025290) -10025290 - -
Year 1 3452086 -6573204 3452086 0.8333 2876738
Year 2 3969089 -2604115 7421175 0.6944 2756312
Year 3 3948328 1344213 11369503 0.5787 2284912
Year 4 3247189 4591402 14616692 0.4823 1565967
TOTAL 9483929

The Net NPV after 4 years is -541361

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9483929 - 10025290 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Orthoteks Usa to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Orthoteks Usa has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Orthoteks Usa can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Orthoteks Usa, then the stock price of the Orthoteks Usa should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Orthoteks Usa should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

Negotiation Strategy of Orthoteks USA (A)

References & Further Readings

Joseph L. Badaracco Jr., Richard G. Hamermesh (2018), "Orthoteks USA (A) Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.

Shikibo Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Apparel/Accessories

Digimarc SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming

Brisbane Broncos Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Recreational Activities

Yuanda China SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services

Tian Shan Development SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services

Daikin Industries SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods

Telecom Plus SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Communications Services

Asiacement SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction - Raw Materials

Schroder Income SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services

Kawata Mfg. SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods