×




Hefei Xingtai Financial Holding Group: Risk Management Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Hefei Xingtai Financial Holding Group: Risk Management case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Hefei Xingtai Financial Holding Group: Risk Management case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Jiuchang Wei, Lei Zhou, Liqiang Sun. The Hefei Xingtai Financial Holding Group: Risk Management (referred as “Xingtai Panteng” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Financial management, Risk management.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Hefei Xingtai Financial Holding Group: Risk Management Case Study


On May 8, 2012, the president of Hefei Xingtai Financial Holding Group (Xingtai) received a message from a senior officer of the Hefei Municipal Government, the company's authorizing body, asking that Xingtai provide financial support to PanTeng Company (PanTeng), a solar power manufacturing company. In order to survive, PanTeng needed Xingtai to provide a guarantee for a A?100 million business loan from a commercial bank. PanTeng had already been turned down by Xingtai Financing Guaranty, one of Xingtai's subsidiaries, because of the potentially high level of guarantee risk. If Xingtai provided a guarantee, it could be liable to reimburse the loan due to PanTeng's high-risk operation, lose its risk management expertise, and face further violations. However, denying the senior officer's request would hamper Xingtai's important relationship with the local government. Should Xingtai take a chance and approve the loan, or should it deny the guarantee? Jiuchang Wei is affiliated with University of Science and Technology China. Lei Zhou is affiliated with University of Science and Technology.


Case Authors : Jiuchang Wei, Lei Zhou, Liqiang Sun

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : Financial management, Risk management




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Hefei Xingtai Financial Holding Group: Risk Management Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10000487) -10000487 - -
Year 1 3462595 -6537892 3462595 0.9434 3266599
Year 2 3956417 -2581475 7419012 0.89 3521197
Year 3 3973047 1391572 11392059 0.8396 3335847
Year 4 3227055 4618627 14619114 0.7921 2556130
TOTAL 14619114 12679773




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2679286

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Profitability Index
3. Payback Period
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Xingtai Panteng shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Xingtai Panteng have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Hefei Xingtai Financial Holding Group: Risk Management

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Xingtai Panteng often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Xingtai Panteng needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10000487) -10000487 - -
Year 1 3462595 -6537892 3462595 0.8696 3010952
Year 2 3956417 -2581475 7419012 0.7561 2991620
Year 3 3973047 1391572 11392059 0.6575 2612343
Year 4 3227055 4618627 14619114 0.5718 1845079
TOTAL 10459994


The Net NPV after 4 years is 459507

(10459994 - 10000487 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10000487) -10000487 - -
Year 1 3462595 -6537892 3462595 0.8333 2885496
Year 2 3956417 -2581475 7419012 0.6944 2747512
Year 3 3973047 1391572 11392059 0.5787 2299217
Year 4 3227055 4618627 14619114 0.4823 1556257
TOTAL 9488482


The Net NPV after 4 years is -512005

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9488482 - 10000487 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Xingtai Panteng to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Xingtai Panteng has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Xingtai Panteng can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Xingtai Panteng, then the stock price of the Xingtai Panteng should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Xingtai Panteng should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Hefei Xingtai Financial Holding Group: Risk Management

References & Further Readings

Jiuchang Wei, Lei Zhou, Liqiang Sun (2018), "Hefei Xingtai Financial Holding Group: Risk Management Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Innoprise Plantations SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Forestry & Wood Products


Apollo Hospitals SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Healthcare Facilities


Seoul Electronics & Telecom SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Nemaura Medical SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Medical Equipment & Supplies


Catalent Inc SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Idc Fluidcontrol A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Misc. Fabricated Products


Tyman SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. - Supplies & Fixtures


SRG Global SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. - Supplies & Fixtures


Telecom Italia SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Communications Services


I3 Energy SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas - Integrated