×




Strategy Execution Module 2: Building a Successful Strategy Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Strategy Execution Module 2: Building a Successful Strategy case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Strategy Execution Module 2: Building a Successful Strategy case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Robert L. Simons. The Strategy Execution Module 2: Building a Successful Strategy (referred as “Module Modules” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Performance measurement, Strategy execution.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Strategy Execution Module 2: Building a Successful Strategy Case Study


This module reading describes the basics of building a successful strategy. Topics in this module include a discussion of the distinction between corporate and business strategy; how to conduct a SWOT analysis of market dynamics and internal capabilities; the use of the five forces analysis to understand customers, suppliers, products, and competitors; how to use this analysis to identify unique opportunities to create value for customers; and an overview of the four Ps of strategy implementation (strategy as perspective, position, plans, and patterns of action). The concepts introduced in this module provide the foundation for executing strategy effectively. While this module is designed to be used alone, it is part of the Strategy Execution series. Taken together, the series forms a complete course that teaches the latest techniques for using performance measurement and control systems to implement strategy. Modules 1 - 4 set out the foundations for strategy implementation. Modules 5 - 10 teach quantitative tools for performance measurement and control. Modules 11 - 15 illustrate the use of these techniques by managers to achieve profit goals and strategies. View the full Strategy Execution series at: hbsp.harvard.edu/strategyexecution.


Case Authors : Robert L. Simons

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : Performance measurement, Strategy execution




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Strategy Execution Module 2: Building a Successful Strategy Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10004013) -10004013 - -
Year 1 3460952 -6543061 3460952 0.9434 3265049
Year 2 3982194 -2560867 7443146 0.89 3544138
Year 3 3961002 1400135 11404148 0.8396 3325734
Year 4 3226905 4627040 14631053 0.7921 2556011
TOTAL 14631053 12690932




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2686919

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Profitability Index
3. Net Present Value
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Module Modules have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Module Modules shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Strategy Execution Module 2: Building a Successful Strategy

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Module Modules often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Module Modules needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10004013) -10004013 - -
Year 1 3460952 -6543061 3460952 0.8696 3009523
Year 2 3982194 -2560867 7443146 0.7561 3011111
Year 3 3961002 1400135 11404148 0.6575 2604423
Year 4 3226905 4627040 14631053 0.5718 1844993
TOTAL 10470051


The Net NPV after 4 years is 466038

(10470051 - 10004013 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10004013) -10004013 - -
Year 1 3460952 -6543061 3460952 0.8333 2884127
Year 2 3982194 -2560867 7443146 0.6944 2765413
Year 3 3961002 1400135 11404148 0.5787 2292247
Year 4 3226905 4627040 14631053 0.4823 1556185
TOTAL 9497971


The Net NPV after 4 years is -506042

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9497971 - 10004013 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Module Modules to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Module Modules has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Module Modules can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Module Modules, then the stock price of the Module Modules should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Module Modules should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Strategy Execution Module 2: Building a Successful Strategy

References & Further Readings

Robert L. Simons (2018), "Strategy Execution Module 2: Building a Successful Strategy Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Avic Aviation Hi Tech SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Banyan Gold SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Gold & Silver


Orocobre SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Non-Metallic Mining


Kiwoom SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


Felissimo Corp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Retail (Catalog & Mail Order)


Fiducial Office SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Office Equipment


Comstock Mining SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Gold & Silver


Haige Communicat A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Communications Equipment


Tefron SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Apparel/Accessories