×




Toshiba: Ome Works Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Toshiba: Ome Works case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Toshiba: Ome Works case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by H. Kent Bowen, Janice H. Hammond, Sylvie Ryckebusch, Hiroshi Uchikoga. The Toshiba: Ome Works (referred as “Ome Toshiba's” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Technology & Operations. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Manufacturing.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Toshiba: Ome Works Case Study


In 1995, Toshiba was the market leader in portable computer sales worldwide. This case describes the assembly of portable notebook computers in Toshiba's Ome factory in Ome, Japan, providing insights into some of the reasons for Toshiba's success. In addition to describing production techniques such as dynamic line balancing, this case probes the nature of the Japanese workforce and the unique problems faced by Japanese businesses.


Case Authors : H. Kent Bowen, Janice H. Hammond, Sylvie Ryckebusch, Hiroshi Uchikoga

Topic : Technology & Operations

Related Areas : Manufacturing




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Toshiba: Ome Works Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10013343) -10013343 - -
Year 1 3464909 -6548434 3464909 0.9434 3268782
Year 2 3962957 -2585477 7427866 0.89 3527018
Year 3 3964391 1378914 11392257 0.8396 3328579
Year 4 3236184 4615098 14628441 0.7921 2563361
TOTAL 14628441 12687740




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2674397

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Payback Period
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Ome Toshiba's have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Ome Toshiba's shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Toshiba: Ome Works

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Technology & Operations Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Ome Toshiba's often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Ome Toshiba's needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10013343) -10013343 - -
Year 1 3464909 -6548434 3464909 0.8696 3012964
Year 2 3962957 -2585477 7427866 0.7561 2996565
Year 3 3964391 1378914 11392257 0.6575 2606651
Year 4 3236184 4615098 14628441 0.5718 1850299
TOTAL 10466479


The Net NPV after 4 years is 453136

(10466479 - 10013343 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10013343) -10013343 - -
Year 1 3464909 -6548434 3464909 0.8333 2887424
Year 2 3962957 -2585477 7427866 0.6944 2752053
Year 3 3964391 1378914 11392257 0.5787 2294208
Year 4 3236184 4615098 14628441 0.4823 1560660
TOTAL 9494345


The Net NPV after 4 years is -518998

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9494345 - 10013343 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Ome Toshiba's to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Ome Toshiba's has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Ome Toshiba's can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Ome Toshiba's, then the stock price of the Ome Toshiba's should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Ome Toshiba's should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Toshiba: Ome Works

References & Further Readings

H. Kent Bowen, Janice H. Hammond, Sylvie Ryckebusch, Hiroshi Uchikoga (2018), "Toshiba: Ome Works Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Crailar Technologies SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Icecure Medical SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Medical Equipment & Supplies


Sportsmans SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Recreational Products


ENI SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas Operations


Tunas Alfin SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Containers & Packaging


Rami Levi SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Retail (Department & Discount)


Levinstein Eng SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


Panpages SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Marindi Metals SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Metal Mining


DLF Holdings SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services