×




Making Sense of Emerging Market Structures in B2B E-Commerce Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Making Sense of Emerging Market Structures in B2B E-Commerce case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Making Sense of Emerging Market Structures in B2B E-Commerce case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by B. Mahadevan. The Making Sense of Emerging Market Structures in B2B E-Commerce (referred as “B2b Mechanisms” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Technology & Operations. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Financial markets, Supply chain.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Making Sense of Emerging Market Structures in B2B E-Commerce Case Study


Over the last five years, a variety of market mechanisms have emerged to address various issues pertaining to business-to-business (B2B) e-commerce. However, there is a general lack of understanding on the part of researchers and practitioners on two key issues: What are the key characteristics of these market mechanisms? What factors drive the choice of one market mechanism over the other? Addresses these questions through a study of 12 different market mechanisms in 200 B2B electronic marketplaces. Four factors--degree of fragmentation, asset specificity, complexity of product description, and complexity of value assessment--significantly drive the choice of an appropriate market mechanism for an organization. To gainfully exploit these market structures, organizations need to devise new strategies and reconfigure their supply chains.


Case Authors : B. Mahadevan

Topic : Technology & Operations

Related Areas : Financial markets, Supply chain




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Making Sense of Emerging Market Structures in B2B E-Commerce Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10011369) -10011369 - -
Year 1 3449718 -6561651 3449718 0.9434 3254451
Year 2 3955679 -2605972 7405397 0.89 3520540
Year 3 3969415 1363443 11374812 0.8396 3332797
Year 4 3226502 4589945 14601314 0.7921 2555692
TOTAL 14601314 12663480




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2652111

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Profitability Index
3. Net Present Value
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of B2b Mechanisms have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. B2b Mechanisms shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Making Sense of Emerging Market Structures in B2B E-Commerce

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Technology & Operations Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at B2b Mechanisms often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at B2b Mechanisms needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10011369) -10011369 - -
Year 1 3449718 -6561651 3449718 0.8696 2999755
Year 2 3955679 -2605972 7405397 0.7561 2991062
Year 3 3969415 1363443 11374812 0.6575 2609955
Year 4 3226502 4589945 14601314 0.5718 1844763
TOTAL 10445534


The Net NPV after 4 years is 434165

(10445534 - 10011369 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10011369) -10011369 - -
Year 1 3449718 -6561651 3449718 0.8333 2874765
Year 2 3955679 -2605972 7405397 0.6944 2746999
Year 3 3969415 1363443 11374812 0.5787 2297115
Year 4 3226502 4589945 14601314 0.4823 1555991
TOTAL 9474870


The Net NPV after 4 years is -536499

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9474870 - 10011369 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of B2b Mechanisms to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of B2b Mechanisms has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at B2b Mechanisms can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at B2b Mechanisms, then the stock price of the B2b Mechanisms should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at B2b Mechanisms should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Making Sense of Emerging Market Structures in B2B E-Commerce

References & Further Readings

B. Mahadevan (2018), "Making Sense of Emerging Market Structures in B2B E-Commerce Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Vodafone Group PLC SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Communications Services


China Gold SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Gold & Silver


Ipsidy SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Peripherals


Sre Group SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Echo International Holdings Group SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Janus Henderson SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


Mochida Pharmaceutical SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


PINE PN SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Regional Banks


Changgao Group A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Montauk Holdings SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Utilities , Natural Gas Utilities