×




Learning From Toys: Lessons in Managing Supply Chain Risk From the Toy Industry Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Learning From Toys: Lessons in Managing Supply Chain Risk From the Toy Industry case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Learning From Toys: Lessons in Managing Supply Chain Risk From the Toy Industry case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by M. Eric Johnson. The Learning From Toys: Lessons in Managing Supply Chain Risk From the Toy Industry (referred as “Toy Lessons” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Technology & Operations. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Marketing, Risk management.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Learning From Toys: Lessons in Managing Supply Chain Risk From the Toy Industry Case Study


The toy industry faces relentless change and an unpredictable buying public, which creates immense challenges in anticipating best sellers and predicting volume. Like the high-technology industry, toys also suffer from many supply chain ailments, including short product life, rapid product turnover, and seasonal demand. Coupled with long supply lines and ongoing political and economic turmoil in Asia, toy makers face an unusually complex set of risks. Managers in many businesses can learn valuable lessons in managing uncertainty from toy makers. This article describes supply chain lessons focused on reducing risk by actively managing both demand and supply variability. These lessons include product variety strategies based on product extensions, rolling mix strategies, leveraged licensing agreements, coordinated outsourcing strategies, and hedging against political and currency risk by producing in many different countries.


Case Authors : M. Eric Johnson

Topic : Technology & Operations

Related Areas : Marketing, Risk management




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Learning From Toys: Lessons in Managing Supply Chain Risk From the Toy Industry Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10005783) -10005783 - -
Year 1 3449463 -6556320 3449463 0.9434 3254210
Year 2 3963980 -2592340 7413443 0.89 3527928
Year 3 3975333 1382993 11388776 0.8396 3337766
Year 4 3234912 4617905 14623688 0.7921 2562353
TOTAL 14623688 12682258




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2676475

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Net Present Value
3. Profitability Index
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Toy Lessons have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Toy Lessons shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Learning From Toys: Lessons in Managing Supply Chain Risk From the Toy Industry

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Technology & Operations Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Toy Lessons often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Toy Lessons needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10005783) -10005783 - -
Year 1 3449463 -6556320 3449463 0.8696 2999533
Year 2 3963980 -2592340 7413443 0.7561 2997338
Year 3 3975333 1382993 11388776 0.6575 2613846
Year 4 3234912 4617905 14623688 0.5718 1849571
TOTAL 10460289


The Net NPV after 4 years is 454506

(10460289 - 10005783 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10005783) -10005783 - -
Year 1 3449463 -6556320 3449463 0.8333 2874553
Year 2 3963980 -2592340 7413443 0.6944 2752764
Year 3 3975333 1382993 11388776 0.5787 2300540
Year 4 3234912 4617905 14623688 0.4823 1560046
TOTAL 9487903


The Net NPV after 4 years is -517880

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9487903 - 10005783 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Toy Lessons to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Toy Lessons has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Toy Lessons can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Toy Lessons, then the stock price of the Toy Lessons should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Toy Lessons should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Learning From Toys: Lessons in Managing Supply Chain Risk From the Toy Industry

References & Further Readings

M. Eric Johnson (2018), "Learning From Toys: Lessons in Managing Supply Chain Risk From the Toy Industry Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Moncey SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Tokyu Fudosan SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Cefc Anhui Intl SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Kleinwort Benson SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


ETERNIT ON SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. - Supplies & Fixtures


Holders SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Fabricated Plastic & Rubber


Bapcor SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts


Cobalt Power SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Sanyu SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Iron & Steel


Beijing Sanyuan Foods SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing